[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 Bug 226048 depends on bug 478651, which changed state. Bug 478651 Summary: Violates package naming guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478651 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 Bug 226048 depends on bug 478651, which changed state. Bug 478651 Summary: Violates package naming guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478651 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||478651 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 --- Comment #7 from Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com 2009-01-02 15:11:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Re-opening the review. Introducing an Epoch should be delayed as long as it makes sense. We do need to fix this now. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/478651 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||debarshi@gmail.com Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 Bug 226048 depends on bug 478651, which changed state. Bug 478651 Summary: Violates package naming guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478651 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-18 05:24 EST --- I would like to request early branching for F-10 of libtheora Package Change Request == Package Name: libtheora New Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-18 12:22 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-13 19:31 EST --- I guess we'll have to wait until a stable version is out (hopefully it won't be called 1.0). Closing this bug, since in this case it's a review of an existing package and there's no owner set -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-11 07:13 EST --- All the Bads and Maybes seem to be fixed in the current rawhide package, except for the version. The only way to fix it that I can see would be to add an epoch, since rpm considers 1.0alpha 1.0. Is this worth an epoch ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-11 11:29 EST --- Introducing an Epoch should be delayed as long as it makes sense. The next upstream version might for example be 1.1 instead of 1.0 which would mean an Epoch introduced today would have had only negative effects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-18 20:11 EST --- Almost ready for approval (see Maybe and Bad section) Good: - Package name matches upstream - Spec file name matches base package name - License matches actual license, included in %doc, is FLOSS - Spec written in American English, is legible - Source matches upstream - Package builds fine on all supported architectures - Build requirements complete - ldconfig called properly - directory ownerships OK - files listing: no duplicates - file permissions OK - Inter-dependencies OK Maybe: - Why --enable-static=yes ? Bad: - rpmlint: E: libtheora invalid-version 1.0alpha7 according to the Naming Guidelines, the 'alpha' part should be part of the release tag W: libtheora-devel summary-ended-with-dot E: theora-tools binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath No documentation for libtheora-devel and theora-tools, but that's fine - Source URL not provided. Also, use .tar.bz2 instead of .tar.gz? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
