[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-07 16:33 EST --- man-pages-it-2.65-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update man-pages-it' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-29 05:22 EST --- Should be fixed and consistent in all actual branches (F7, F8, devel). Thank you for reviewing. jirka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-29 13:12 EST --- The F-7 branch still has License: GPL, different source URL and the unneeded 0: in the autoconf dependency, but fixing those is not obviously required per this review as the F-8 and devel branches look ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-28 16:13 EST --- Created an attachment (id=240941) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=240941action=view) Remaining cosmetic fixes Ok, devel branch looks good now, patch for some remaining cosmetic issues attached. Approved with it applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: openobex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-25 15:35 EST ---
Ok, looks better now. However there's now branch confusion as the F-8 and devel
branches have changes (ipv6, source URL, License tag) that are not included in
the F-7 branch but on the other hand lack fixes in the F-7 one (cleanups,
libusb.pc fix). And the 1.3-6%{?dist} in F-7 and F-8+ are quite different.
If the current F-7 package fixes were ported to the devel branch and then the
whole shebang back to earlier branches from devel, I think we'd be good to go.
Let me know when one/some of the branches have all the fixes and I'll take one
more look at that.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-24 04:08 EST --- Hi, it should be fixed only in F-7 branch. I will fix it in all other branches when you'll check it. Thank you jirka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-23 09:32 EST --- Hi, I fixed the errors above, so could someone please re-check it? Thank you jirka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-23 14:50 EST --- I don't see any of the raised issues fixed in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-15 03:57 EST --- adding the new owner of openobex to CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-13 11:03 EST --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-24 10:56 EST --- Created an attachment (id=150826) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150826action=view) Fix pkgconfig path on lib64 archs - libusb.pc is searched from a wrong dir on lib64 archs by configure (see patch), resulting in missing Requires: libusb from the .pc file - BuildRequires and ExcludeArch for -apps seem to be dupes, they're already in the main package - autoreconf would be better placed in %prep - configuring with --disable-dependency-tracking would clean up the build output and possibly speed the build up a bit - Summaries and descriptions could be improved quite a bit. The description for -devel is actually wrong. - make -C doc does not actually seem to build anything, and (unsurprisingly) its results aren't included in any subpackages. Perhaps build the HTML doc (make -C doc html) and include it in -devel, or don't build any of the docs, and drop the make -C doc as well as docbook related build dependencies? - Including all AUTHORS etc %docs in all subpackages doesn't look too useful, perhaps drop them altogether from -apps and -devel since they require the main package anyway and seem to contain only generic info about the software which is probably best kept in the main package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 09:07 EST --- right please check openobex-1.3-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-06 16:23 EST --- What is the license of this package? License tag says LGPL, upstream tarball contains both GPL and LGPL license texts, contains both GPL (irda.h, obex_connect.h) and LGPL sources, and only the GPL license file is included in binary packages. Mixture of GPL and LGPL sources which are all built in would make all of this fall under the GPL, no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
