[Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils

2010-01-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324


Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||182235(FE-Legal)




--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz  2010-01-04 04:25:36 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 OK, the URL and Source links can be added.
 
 About the licensing problem: I e-mailed the author of the package, whether he
 has some more information about this. The files are used in fixmacps 
 utility,
 which fixes PostScript files generated on Mac computers.
 
 If the license will still be a problem, we will have to exclude this utility
 and these two files from the package.

Only Fedora Legal can give the definitive answer, but in my opinion we are not
allowed to distribute such files and they have to removed even from the source
archive.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils

2009-12-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324


Daniel Novotny dnovo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tsmet...@redhat.com




--- Comment #5 from Daniel Novotny dnovo...@redhat.com  2009-12-22 09:27:00 
EDT ---
OK, the URL and Source links can be added.

About the licensing problem: I e-mailed the author of the package, whether he
has some more information about this. The files are used in fixmacps utility,
which fixes PostScript files generated on Mac computers.

If the license will still be a problem, we will have to exclude this utility
and these two files from the package.

p.s. I have uploaded http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dnovotny/f/psutils.spec
with the latest changes (currently added URL and Source)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils

2009-12-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324





--- Comment #4 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz  2009-12-03 09:20:07 EDT ---
few initial notes:
- I've found the homepage at http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~ajcd/psutils/ and
downloadable archive as ftp://ftp.knackered.org/pub/psutils/psutils-p17.tar.gz,
so the URL and Source tags can be filled
- I see a licensing problem with the md??_0.ps files that should be copyrighted
by Apple per the author

The spec file looks good overall.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils

2009-12-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324


Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||d...@danny.cz,
   ||dnovo...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@danny.cz
   Flag|needinfo?(tsmet...@redhat.c |fedora-review?
   |om) |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils

2009-04-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324


Martin Bacovsky mbaco...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||needinfo?(tsmet...@redhat.c
   ||om)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils

2009-04-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324


Martin Bacovsky mbaco...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(mbaco...@redhat.c |
   |om) |




--- Comment #3 from Martin Bacovsky mbaco...@redhat.com  2009-04-28 13:33:13 
EDT ---
I found out this bug is waiting on me. Since I'm no longer maintainer of
psutils, I changed the needinfo requestee to the current one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils

2008-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: psutils


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |medium
   Priority|normal  |medium
Product|Fedora Extras   |Fedora
Version|devel   |rawhide

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
   Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ||m)




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-15 03:53 EST ---
1) use macros. replace /usr/bin with %{_bindir}and /usr/lib with %{_libdir}
2)you can even write defattr as defattr(-,root,root,-)
3)buildroot is wrong make it similar to given at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473
4)rpmlint gave me
psutils.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog
psutils.i386: W: invalid-license distributable
psutils.i386: W: no-url-tag
psutils.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
psutils.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file
/tmp/psutils-1.17-27.fc9.src.rpm.4019/psutils.spec
psutils.src:48: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/psutils
psutils.src:141: W: macro-in-%changelog attr
psutils.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog
psutils.src: W: invalid-license distributable
psutils.src: W: no-url-tag


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils

2008-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: psutils


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-15 04:02 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=291696)
 -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291696action=view)
Modified SPEC

Only you need to add correct License tag here which I think is Freely
redistributable without restriction

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review