[Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-01-01 12:26:49
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
xcdroast.src:103: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}
xcdroast.src:104: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}/bin
xcdroast.src:105: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}/icons
xcdroast.src:106: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}/sound
xcdroast.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}/*/*
xcdroast.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/xcdroast-0.98/TRANSLATION.HOWTO
xcdroast.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xcdroast-0.98/ChangeLog
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-01-01 12:43:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=381208) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=381208) Suggested patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550
--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-01-01 12:52:26
EDT ---
After application of patch, rpmlint is clean.
When you apply the patch, be sure to modify the desktop file for the new
location of the icon.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
- After application of patch.
- The patch lines that have been commented out should be removed completely.
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
NEEDSWORK
- The files in src/ don't have any license statements.
- The GPLv2 COPYING is attached = assumed license is GPL+.
- Files in intl/ are under LGPLv2+.
= License field should be GPL+ and LGPLv2+, or the resulting GPLv2+.
Please ask upstream to clarify license and add license headers to all source
code files.
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
- Source URL bad, patch fixes it.
- Source matches upstream.
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
- At least after application of patch.
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
- After application of patch.
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
- After application of patch.
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
Apply the patch and fix the license tag, then I'll approve the review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 Roman Rakus rra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|rra...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 Roman Rakus rra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 Roman Rakus rra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rra...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Roman Rakus rra...@redhat.com 2009-02-17 09:25:48 EDT --- xcdroast-0.98-0.1.alpha16.fc11 built. Now it should be ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rra...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-01-30 05:25:09 EDT --- Roman Rakus is the owner acc. to the PackageDB. Added as cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550
Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fab...@bernewireless.net
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2008-12-15
05:11:11 EDT ---
Just some comments...
- X-CD-Roast 0.98alpha16 released
http://www.xcdroast.org/#download
- Summary ends with a dot
- Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root)
- Use parallel make (make %{?_smp_mflags})
- Package doesn't consistently use macros
- Please add a note because 'PREFIX=/usr' is used
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Relocatable_packages
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
