[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:23:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Comment #22 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-27 21:53:22 EDT --- Package Change Request === Package Name: irsim Short Description: Switch-level simulator Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-05 17:05 EST --- Package pre-import admin stuff done. Feel free to import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-05 13:52 EST --- Okay!! This package (irsim) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-05 11:43 EST --- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/irsim.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/irsim-9.7.41-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-05 10:55 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=147364)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147364&action=view)
irsim -3.1 spec file I created
A bit modified irsim.spec
I added some fixes for mainly two issues.
*
---
%{__cp} -p doc/faultsim/fsim.ps %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
---
This is of no sense because %doc macro firstly clean
%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} directory.
*
%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}/doc/
...
%{__rm} -f
%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}/doc/{irsim,irsim-analyzer,netchange}.doc
The latter does nothing.
I have not yet checked your example, however,
> You can avoid this by adding to your home .Xdefaults file:
>
> irsim.background: black
>
> and then reloading with "xrdb -load .Xdefaults".
... Can this be done automatically by adding some files in irsim
rpm? If it cannot, adding some documentation may be kinder.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-04 15:19 EST --- Created an attachment (id=147327) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147327&action=view) corrected screenshot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-04 15:16 EST --- We know what the problem is : which in fact quite silly. :) The display was being redrawn after all. The problem is that the background is being drawn white, and the traces are drawn white, so the result is white-on-white, and invisible! The Tcl/Tk version was hacked on top of the X11 version, and some things aren't properly configured for Tcl/Tk. In Magic and XCircuit, the X defaults has been moved to Tcl, where they are read from a Tcl script. In IRSIM, the properties are still controlled by X11 and the X11 resource manager. The white-on-white probably comes from a default .Xdefaults or possibly .Xresources setting "*background: white" which makes all backgrounds white by default. You can avoid this by adding to your home .Xdefaults file: irsim.background: black and then reloading with "xrdb -load .Xdefaults". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-04 14:57 EST --- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/irsim.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/irsim-9.7.41-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-04 14:43 EST --- Created an attachment (id=147321) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147321&action=view) c.ps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-04 14:42 EST --- Created an attachment (id=147320) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147320&action=view) screenshot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-04 14:41 EST --- Created an attachment (id=147319) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147319&action=view) example.cmd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-04 14:41 EST --- Created an attachment (id=147318) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147318&action=view) tut_irsim_scmos2um.prm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-04 14:40 EST --- Created an attachment (id=147317) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147317&action=view) tut_irsim_gate.sim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-04 14:40 EST --- I struck a bug, which I'm working with upstream reveal its identify. I think you should be aware of what it is (perhaps you might find something that we can't see ): irsim tut_irsim_scmos2um.prm tut_irsim_gate.sim -example.cmd I can't see any changes on analyser however when I print the output to a file, I can see evolution with respect to time. see file c.ps see screenshot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-03 06:06 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Well, for -2.1: > > * License: > I doubt that this is licensed under GPL. > All texts which include explicit license terms > refer to the same sentences, however, I just > don't know how this license is called... > Please check: > ./analyzer/anXhelper.c for example. > (Note: license for files created by autotools >should be ignored). > under scripts/irsim.spec.in you will see GPL. However, I've asked upstream for more clarity on this. Here is what he answered: - The only copyright notices that appear are in the C code itself. For a typical example (they're all the same as far as I saw): /base/rsim.c has the following copyright notice: * * Copyright (C) 1988, 1990 Stanford University. * * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this * * software and its documentation for any purpose and without* * fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright * * notice appear in all copies. Stanford University * * makes no representations about the suitability of this* * software for any purpose. It is provided "as is" without * * express or implied warranty. Export of this software outside * * of the United States of America may require an export license.* * >From my meager understanding of software copyright law, the fact that the Stanford copyright is less restrictive than GPL means that the GPL license may be applied to the package without any problem. I can add the standard GPL copyright notice to the distribution, if you would like. Regards, Tim -- So eventually, I asked him to add the GPL notice to the package. > * Some documentation > I wonder if the 3 documentation > - > /usr/lib/irsim/doc/irsim-analyzer.doc > /usr/lib/irsim/doc/irsim.doc > /usr/lib/irsim/doc/netchange.doc > - > are really needed because: > * they are the same as man pages installed. > * it seems that they are not used at runtime. > You are right about it, I'll remove them. > ? Would you give me some examples so that > I can check if this program works well? > > ? I just wonder if the following compilation flag is > proper: > - > DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > - > Should this be your mail address? > I'll point it to http://bugzilla.redhat.com > ? By the way, what are the files under other/ > directory? Generally in this type of packages, they are contributed codes that - we don't know their license - they are not currently maintained - we don't know about their accuracy/precision on their methods -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 11:07 EST --- Well, for -2.1: * License: I doubt that this is licensed under GPL. All texts which include explicit license terms refer to the same sentences, however, I just don't know how this license is called... Please check: ./analyzer/anXhelper.c for example. (Note: license for files created by autotools should be ignored). * Some documentation I wonder if the 3 documentation - /usr/lib/irsim/doc/irsim-analyzer.doc /usr/lib/irsim/doc/irsim.doc /usr/lib/irsim/doc/netchange.doc - are really needed because: * they are the same as man pages installed. * it seems that they are not used at runtime. ? Would you give me some examples so that I can check if this program works well? ? I just wonder if the following compilation flag is proper: - DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" - Should this be your mail address? ? By the way, what are the files under other/ directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 09:27 EST --- Created an attachment (id=147103) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147103&action=view) irsim -2.1 spec file I created Well: * Source tarball includes unneeded symlink. Your original spec file does not remove this symlink on %clean stage. * Passing cflags can be done in more easy way. And the manual modification against files automatically created by configure should be avoided when possible. * Timestamps are not kept My spec file should hopefully fix them. Please check it. I will check if another issues are left to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 07:10 EST --- Umm.. rawhide report says that currently several packages have broken dependency against tk as tk is upgraded to 8.5, so first I have to rebuild all broken packages locally against new tk first... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 07:05 EST --- Well, I want to check -2 today (in Japan, EST+14h), however rawhide upgraded tk related packages and please wait until upgrading ends successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 03:16 EST --- typo: SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/irsim-9.7.41-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 03:12 EST --- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/irsim.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/irsim-9.7.41-1.src.rpm Then, magic too suffers from that missing CFLAGS. I'll work on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 02:21 EST --- Created an attachment (id=147073) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147073&action=view) Mock build log of irsim-9.7.41-1.fc7 Only tried to rebuild this: not checked for packaging issue. Mock build log of irsim-9.7.41-1 on FC-devel i386. Fedora specific compilation flags are not passed. Please check how CFLAGS etc are dealt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
