[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #52 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-28 14:23:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #51 from Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au 2008-12-27 21:52:42 EDT --- Package Change Request === Package Name: netgen Short Description: LVS netlist comparison tool Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-23 07:22 EST --- Please hold on. I'll make a new release soon today. Actually the desktop files of my applications point to Education;Science;Engineering. In fact this is wrong and should be changed to Science;Engineering or Science;Electronics as stated by http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html Additional Category - Description- Related Categories Electronics - Electronics software, e.g. a circuit designer- [ ] Engineering - Engineering software, e.g. CAD programs- [ ] For netgen, I'll use: [Desktop Entry] Categories=Science;Electronics; I'll produce patches for other packages for electronic simulation and data computing (that others are packaging, such as qucs, octave, pikdev,..) and requests the changes on rawhide soon. At the same time, I'll be filing bugs for duplicate entries. Since those packages are not meant for Education (but instead Engineering), the category Education is inappropriate. Meanwhile your thoughts are welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-23 08:12 EST --- Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen-1.3.7-12.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen.spec logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_122773/logs/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-23 11:36 EST --- Okay, This package (netgen) is APPROVED by me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-23 11:43 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: netgen Short Description: LVS netlist comparison tool Owners: chitlesh Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-23 16:24 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-22 08:16 EST --- One question. * Desktop file - This package does not contain any desktop file. However xcircuit is also Tcl/Tk application and xcircuit has desktop file So may it be that netgen should also have desktop file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-22 11:20 EST --- (In reply to comment #40) So may it be that netgen should also have desktop file? Yes, true. Netgen should have a desktop file. However, is this the only issue (meanwhile I'm searching for an appropriate icon )? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-22 11:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #41) However, is this the only issue (meanwhile I'm searching for an appropriate icon )? Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-22 12:08 EST --- Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen-1.3.7-11.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen.spec The png is a screenshot taken on adder4 (an alliance's example) by me. Its license is GPL+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-23 00:07 EST --- At least desktop-file-utils is missing from BR. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=121359 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-21 06:54 EST ---
Updated (without dumping the release):
SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen-1.3.7-10.fc7.src.rpm
SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen.spec
logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_111617/
changes:
%configure --with-tcl=%{_libdir} --with-tk=%{_libdir} \
--with-tcllibs=%{_libdir} --with-tklibs=%{_libdir}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-18 08:25 EST --- Well, still not good on 64 bits. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_107798/logs/x86_64/build.log says : checking for tkConfig.sh... /usr/lib64/tkConfig.sh checking for wish executable... /usr/bin/wish Can't find tcl library Reverting to non-Tcl compile checking for X... libraries , headers Some detailed logs are found on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108275 I may try to check how to fix this after I finith commenting on other review requests... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-17 04:49 EST --- Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen-1.3.7-9.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-17 11:57 EST --- Well, * I only have i386 * I only tried to rebuild the srpm and I did not do anything else but build fails at least on x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107147 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-17 13:11 EST --- I'll look at it. However how can you upload the srpm and build on koji ? Can I do it too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-17 13:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #35) However how can you upload the srpm and build on koji ? Can I do it too ? Yes. Actually I was told from Jason Tibbitts that now we can try to rebuild arbitrary srpm by scratch build: koji build --scratch target your srpm Currently target may be: dist-f8, dist-fc7-updates-candidate. If the rebuild ends successfully, the result rpms are to be put on http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/your FAS name/task_number/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-17 20:10 EST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
make install still fails for some reason, but I solved it by manually
creating
%{_libdir}/%{name} in the build root before running make install in
the %install
section.
Can i have a look why it's failing on x86_64 arch?
The problem is simply that the Makefile in lib/ does not check for the
existence
of $prefix/%{_libdir}/%{name} before attempting to copy the file. I can
create
an account on my x86_64 machine if you want to check for your self, but the
problem can easily be fixed either by adding the directory to the
install-dirs
rule in the top level Makefile, or by manually running mkdir -p
%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name} before running make install.
On the other hand, it seems kind of strange to me to install the scripts in
libdir in the first place. Wouldn't the correct location be libexec?
Updated:
SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen-1.3.7-10.fc7.src.rpm
SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/netgen/netgen.spec
logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_107798/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-06 13:56 EST --- I'm now closing this bug as WONTFIX! If anyone happened to know an opensource LVS checker which can be used with other opensource tools such as magic and xcircuit, please, let me know: chitlesh [AT] fedoraproject DOT org http://clunixchit.blogspot.com/2007/08/loss-there-is-no-opensource-lvs-netlist.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-05 20:18 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: netgen [Removed Branches: FC-6 devel ] [Removed Fedora Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] this package crashes (segmentation faults) during its main functionality. Upstream didn't reply to me and there is no reason to push it into the fedora collection nor maintaining it for the moment. Please remove netgen's FC-6 and development branches. It was neither built nor released into the mirrors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:42 EST --- Shouldn't this ticket be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-10 05:10 EST ---
(In reply to comment #25)
The build on x86_64 failed. I thought you tested it under x86_64?
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-6-extras/33099-netgen-1.3.7-7.fc6/
I did test it on x86_64, but I am indeed the one to blame here. Yum installs
both tcl.i386 and tcl.x86_64, so when building the package, netgen would find
the i386 libraries. This, however, is not the case when building in mock. Then
only the x86_64 libs are installed. By adding --with=tcllibs=%{_libdir} and
--with-tklibs%{_libdir}, the package also builds in mock.
Sorry for my lack of attention to details, I hope my review skills will improve
over time!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-10 14:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #26) Sorry for my lack of attention to details, I hope my review skills will improve over time! You have done a great review. Your contribution to Fedora Electronics' world is admirable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-09 14:53 EST --- The build on x86_64 failed. I thought you tested it under x86_64? http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-6-extras/33099-netgen-1.3.7-7.fc6/ however, I've some segmentation fault when using netgen with my netlists. So I'll be working on finding more why and what is failing to contact upstream. Though netgen is important for my daily work, I prefer not to have a broken netgen on fedora repositories. So I'll take my time before closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-cvs?, fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-06 05:33 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: netgen Short Description: LVS netlist comparison tool Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-02 15:22 EST --- APPROVED by Trond Danielsen; package looks good to me! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-30 03:27 EST --- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen.spec SRPM http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen-1.3.7-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-25 16:19 EST ---
Ok, build on x86_64. Just one more issue and everything should be ok: netgen.doc
is installed in %{_libdir}/netgen/doc, should it not be in
/usr/share/doc/netgen?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-23 11:11 EST --- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen.spec SRPM http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen-1.3.7-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|normal |medium
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-21 03:32 EST ---
Nope, still does not work on x86_64. Any particular reason why you write:
%configure \
--with-tcl=%{_prefix}/lib$SUF \
--with-tk=%{_prefix}/lib$SUF \
--with-tcllibs=%{_prefix}/lib$SUF \
--with-tklibs=%{_prefix}/lib$SUF
instead of just:
%configure --with-tcl=%{_libdir} --with-tk=%{_libdir}
I've tested it on both i386 and x86_64, and it works fine.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-11 07:18 EST --- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen.spec SRPM http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen-1.3.7-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |t.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||t.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-03 09:16 EST ---
Now I know why it fails on x86_64. I did not spot this configure warning at
first:
- - - -
checking for tclConfig.sh...
Can't find Tcl configuration script tclConfig.sh
Reverting to non-Tcl compilation
checking for X... libraries /usr/lib64, headers
checking for gethostbyname... yes
checking for connect... yes
- - - -
The real problem is that the makefile in netgen/lib does not check if install
path exists before attempting to copy the file, but adding --with-tcl=%{_libdir}
to %configure solves the problem.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-29 08:14 EST --- Created an attachment (id=151189) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151189action=view) build.log from mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-28 18:18 EST --- can you post the build.log instead ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 07:06 EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
make install still fails for some reason, but I solved it by manually
creating
%{_libdir}/%{name} in the build root before running make install in
the %install
section.
Can i have a look why it's failing on x86_64 arch?
The problem is simply that the Makefile in lib/ does not check for the existence
of $prefix/%{_libdir}/%{name} before attempting to copy the file. I can create
an account on my x86_64 machine if you want to check for your self, but the
problem can easily be fixed either by adding the directory to the install-dirs
rule in the top level Makefile, or by manually running mkdir -p
%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name} before running make install.
On the other hand, it seems kind of strange to me to install the scripts in
libdir in the first place. Wouldn't the correct location be libexec?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-23 08:48 EST --- Created an attachment (id=150746) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150746action=view) install.log make install fails on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-22 13:59 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
make install still fails for some reason, but I solved it by manually
creating
%{_libdir}/%{name} in the build root before running make install in
the %install
section.
Can i have a look why it's failing on x86_64 arch?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-22 14:10 EST --- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen.spec SRPM http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen-1.3.7-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-19 04:01 EST ---
make install still fails for some reason, but I solved it by manually creating
%{_libdir}/%{name} in the build root before running make install in the %install
section.
There are also some unpackaged file in %{_bindir}:
- - - - - -
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/bin/inetcomp
/usr/bin/netcomp
/usr/bin/ntk2adl
/usr/bin/ntk2xnf
- - - - - -
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-17 17:35 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) Build fails on x86_64. Problem seems to be hardcoded library paths, but I haven't figured out where this is done. See complete build log in #4 Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen.spec SRPM http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen-1.3.7-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-17 17:37 EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
One more comment; does this make a difference?
no it doesn't.
the %{_libdir}/%{name}/ implies a folder. It's only for visual aspect only.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-13 06:28 EST --- Created an attachment (id=149914) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149914action=view) rpmbuild output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-13 06:29 EST --- Build fails on x86_64. Problem seems to be hardcoded library paths, but I haven't figured out where this is done. See complete build log in #4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-13 06:31 EST ---
One more comment; does this make a difference?
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc README VERSION TO_DO Changes Copying netgen.doc
%{_bindir}/%{name}
-%{_libdir}/%{name}/
+%{_libdir}/%{name}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-12 18:35 EST --- Looks good to me! If you want I will go through the formal review tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-03 10:45 EST --- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen.spec SRPM http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/netgen-1.3.7-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
