[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233352


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Product|Fedora Extras   |Fedora
Version|devel   |rawhide

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-16 15:38 EST ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: funtools
New Branches: EL-5


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233352


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-16 20:09 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |medium

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-27 03:41 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: fntools
Short Description: FITS library and utilities
Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branches: FC-5 FC-6
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-27 08:49 EST ---
done (with corrected package name)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-26 04:57 EST ---
Hello, this new version of the rpm:

http://t-rex.fis.ucm.es/~spr/funtools.spec
http://t-rex.fis.ucm.es/~spr/funtools-1.3.0-0.4.b29.fc6.src.rpm

makes the warnings disappear. I have commented the issue with parallel make
inside the spec file and I will communicate it to upstream.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-25 14:41 EST ---
Good:
+ Local build works fine.
+ Rpmlint quite on source rpm.
+ Rpmlint quite on binary rpm.
+ Rpmlint quite on Debuginfo rpm.
+ License Ok.
+ Package contains verbartin copy of the license.
+ Mock build works fine.


Bad:
- Rpmlint complaints installed package:
rpmlint funtools
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 sqrt
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0
Tcl_GetStringFromObj
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 
Tcl_ResetResult
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0
Tcl_CreateObjCommand
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 gzopen
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 gzclose
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 
Tcl_SetStringObj
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 
Tcl_GetObjResult
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 Tcl_PkgProvide
Please forward this problem to the upstream author.
- rpmlint funtools
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 sqrt
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0
Tcl_GetStringFromObj
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 
Tcl_ResetResult
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0
Tcl_CreateObjCommand
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 gzopen
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 gzclose
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 
Tcl_SetStringObj
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 
Tcl_GetObjResult
W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 Tcl_PkgProvide
Thats Ok, becouse package has problem with parallel build. Please forward this
problem to the upstream.
- Please put a comment on the SPEC file, that parallel build won't works.

*** APPROVED ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-25 15:03 EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
[...]
 W: funtools undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclfun.so.1.0 
 Tcl_PkgProvide
 Thats Ok, becouse package has problem with parallel build.

What does parallel build have to do with undefined non-weak symbols in the first
place, and why would a broken parallel build make them acceptable?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-25 15:36 EST ---
Nothing,

Perhaps I have wrote the issues in an unclearly manner.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-23 06:16 EST ---
Yes, the problem is there. I have tested the srpm with multiprocessor machines
and I get the same failed build.

This is the rpm with the parallel make flag removed

http://t-rex.fis.ucm.es/~spr/funtools.spec
http://t-rex.fis.ucm.es/~spr/funtools-1.3.0-0.3.b29.fc6.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-22 13:25 EST ---
It has to be a problem with the x86_64 arch, because I tested that it builds in
mock, but only for i386.

Could you test if this new version builds? I have added some minor fixes.

http://t-rex.fis.ucm.es/~spr/funtools.spec
http://t-rex.fis.ucm.es/~spr/funtools-1.3.0-0.2.b29.fc6.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-22 14:09 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=150683)
 -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150683action=view)
build log from local build

It's seem not to bee an x64 specific problem.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-23 02:57 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 Created an attachment (id=150683)
 -- 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150683action=view) 
[edit]
 build log from local build
 
 It's seem not to bee an x64 specific problem.

Looks like a parallel make problem.

Not always reproducible for me, however one time
mockbuild failed with -j4.
What happens if you drop parallel make support (i.e.
delete %{?_smp_mflags})?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-21 16:35 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=150626)
 -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150626action=view)
log file from local build


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233352] Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities

2007-03-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funtools - FITS library and utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233352


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-21 16:36 EST ---
God:
+ Naming seems ok.
+ Tar ball matches with upstream.

Bad:
- Local build fails, please see attached build.log

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review