[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2009-10-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||al...@users.sourceforge.net




--- Comment #23 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net  2009-10-25 
15:40:37 EDT ---
By the way, this package is being re-reviewed for a name from elisa-moovida at
bug #530021.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-22 04:34 EST ---
The devel branch has been rebuilt, others are following now :-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-21 04:47 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: elisa
Short Description: Media Center
Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branches: devel F-7 FC-6 EL-5
InitialCC: 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-20 09:59 EST ---
(in reply to comment #19)
surely...^^

Well,

OK - Mock : Built on FC6 en F-7 (i386 and x86_64)
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License is LGPL
OK - License match extras packaging policy licenses allowed
OK - License file is included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum:
c9ce0b7b3519577b5f460b20c42e04c9  elisa-1.6.0.tar.gz
OK - Package has correct buildroot.
OK - BuildRequires isn't redundant.
OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Changelog section is correct.

OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should package latest version


Rpmlint output:

OK - silent on both srpm and rpm.



==
** APPROVED **
==

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-17 03:22 EST ---
 I'd prefer avoiding this. If the desktop file is sane enough and already
 provided, it's fine to install it directly.

By using this command you make the desktop file available on the GNOME/KDE/SFCE
menu (and/or panel).



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-17 03:41 EST ---
  I'd prefer avoiding this. If the desktop file is sane enough and already
  provided, it's fine to install it directly.
 
 By using this command you make the desktop file available on the 
 GNOME/KDE/SFCE
 menu (and/or panel).

Hum, I really don't think desktop-file-install has aything to do with this.
Maybe you're thinking of other tools like update-desktop-database and others,
run from scriplets, which do some magic?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-16 14:07 EST ---
 you forgot to install the desktop file by using desktop-file-install
 command and add desktop-file-utils as BR.

I'd prefer avoiding this. If the desktop file is sane enough and already
provided, it's fine to install it directly.

 you SHOULD Remove Application, X-Ximian-Main and X-Red-Hat-Base from
 Categories entry

Sure, I'll patch all this out. One interesting thing is that the current
rhythmbox, gnome-cd and gnome-volume-control desktop files on my FC6 system
contain the exact same lines.

Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa.spec
SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa-0.1.6-4.src.rpm

* Wed May 16 2007 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.1.6-4
- Patch desktop file to remove useless bits (Version and extra Categories).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


Bug 233598 depends on bug 228303, which changed state.

Bug 228303 Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to 
read and write music files tags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-14 12:32 EST ---
All dependencies are now in Fedora (python-tag has just been rebuilt).

It's definitely time for a complete review now... feel free! :-)

(Note that I also have another Media Center package waiting for a review :
oxine, based on the xine lib, bug #230549)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-14 12:45 EST ---
Well, good to know.

 (Note that I also have another Media Center package waiting for a review :
 oxine, based on the xine lib, bug #230549)

I'll check it out.

Starting review...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-09 07:18 EST ---
Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa.spec
SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa-0.1.6-3.src.rpm

* Tue May  8 2007 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.1.6-3
- Change Coherence requirement to python-Coherence to match package name change.

- python-Coherence should be imported and built shortly.
- python-tag is the only dependency left... I didn't hear back from the author
  yet :-(

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-07 07:23 EST ---
Please note that the two patches I include have now been included upstream for
the next Elisa release (the desktop files one in a better form, since a check
still makes sense).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-07 10:42 EST ---
Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa.spec
SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa-0.1.6-2.src.rpm

* Mon May  7 2007 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.1.6-2
- Change coherence requirement to Coherence to match package name change.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-07 13:06 EST ---
Redundant Require:

python-twisted-core is required by Coherence package which is required by elisa.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-07 13:21 EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
 Redundant Require:
 
 python-twisted-core is required by Coherence package which is required by 
 elisa.

I wouldn't consider this a redundant require, since Coherence requires twisted,
but so does Elisa directly. If some day Coherence no longer requires it, or if
Elisa no longer requires Coherence, I want the requirement from within Elisa to
still be there.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-07 14:48 EST ---
okay,

The package python-tag (bug #228303) need to be accepted and imported first
before approved this one.
as it's a Require of elisa.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-04 02:40 EST ---
Quick pass over the spec file...

You'll need to add the appropriate desktop-file-install call in the install
section and add BuildRequires:  desktop-file-utils

-jef

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-04 02:48 EST ---
Oh and the URL and SOURCE tags need to be updated, same thing as we went through
with pigment. 

www.fluendo.com - elisa.fluendo.com  

Looks like elisa 0.1.6 is out according to the website. Do you want to bump up
to 0.1.6 before i start the real review?
http://elisa.fluendo.com/static/download/elisa/elisa-0.1.6.tar.gz

-jef

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-04 02:58 EST ---
Does python-setuptools need to be a Requires and a BuildRequires?  The Requires
seems odd to me.

-jef

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-05-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


Bug 233598 depends on bug 233597, which changed state.

Bug 233597 Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-04-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


Bug 233598 depends on bug 228298, which changed state.

Bug 228298 Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between 
Python objects in a wide variety of contexts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-04-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


Bug 233598 depends on bug 228301, which changed state.

Bug 228301 Summary: Review Request: python-nevow - Web application construction 
kit written in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228301

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|normal  |medium




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-04-16 07:01 EST ---
Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa.spec
SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa-0.1.5-1.src.rpm

* Mon Apr 16 2007 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 0.1.5-1
- Update to 0.1.5.
- Disable gst requirements which aren't part of Fedora (oops!).
- Patch out the hash-bang python from scripts not meant to be executed.
- Rip out the root user test condition to installing the desktop entry.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn||228298, 228299, 228301,
   ||228303, 233596, 233597




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-23 08:37 EST ---
Note that this package depends on a few python packages as well as the pigment
toolkit, which will need to be reviewed first (see the bug dependencies).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center

2007-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-23 12:11 EST ---
Okay, 

i'will review all request dependencies before start this one

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review