[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-08-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
   Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])|




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-08-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-08-08 12:54 EST ---
ping again?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-08-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
   Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-08-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-08-01 12:43 EST ---
Please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE when rebuild is done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-26 12:19 EST ---
Okay. for -7:

* gettext .po files
  - Well, actually LANG=de_DE linkchecker URL works, however
non-ascii characters are corrupted (same for fr, perhaps and
for es)
Changing the encoding from ISO-8859-1 to UTF-8 (by iconv)
seems to work.

Other things seems okay. Please fix the issue above and I think
I can approve this package (if I did not overlook anything).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-26 11:59 EST ---
Almost okay, assiging.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-26 19:04 EST ---
On my system, I don't see any corrupted characters.

Both LANG=de_DE man linkchecker and LANG=de_DE linkchecker
http://www.flyn.org; look fine.

No corrupt characters with linkchecker-4.7-7.fc7 here.  I tested this using
gnome-terminal and a text console.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-26 23:21 EST ---
Ah... I had to specify locale explicitly LANG=de_DE.UTF-8...
Okay.


   This package (linkchecker) is APPROVED by me


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-25 12:28 EST ---
Well, 

* Still _linkchecker_configdata.py (and configuration/__init__.py)
  expects that linkcheckerrc and logging.conf are installed under
  /usr/share/linkchecker, not under /etc/linkchecker/.

  _linkchecker_configdata.py should be modified so that config_dir points
  to /etc/linkchecker. Also both logging.conf and linkcheckerrc should be 
  moved under /etc/linkchecker and be marked as %config(noreplace)

* And it seems to me that files under /usr/share/linkchecker/examples
  are documents and can be moved under /usr/share/doc/linkchecker-version.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-25 20:34 EST ---
Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec
SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-7.fc7.src.rpm

I got rid of the examples entirely.  The installer does not put them is a good
spot.  I'm not sure the value of installing example code in /usr/share/doc 
anyway.  

I did modify the installer to put the configuration files in /etc/linkchecker.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-24 21:23 EST ---
Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec
SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-5.fc7.src.rpm

This should fix the three problems listed in comment #9.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-24 21:24 EST ---
Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec
SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-6.fc7.src.rpm

This should fix the three problems listed in comment #9.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-23 09:49 EST ---
This time:

* linkchecker won't work:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mock]# linkchecker http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr//bin/linkchecker, line 527, in module
config.init_logging(debug=options.debug)
  File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/linkcheck/configuration/__init__.py,
line 161, in init_logging
logging.config.fileConfig(filename)
  File /usr/lib/python2.5/logging/config.py, line 76, in fileConfig
formatters = _create_formatters(cp)
  File /usr/lib/python2.5/logging/config.py, line 107, in _create_formatters
flist = cp.get(formatters, keys)
  File /usr/lib/python2.5/ConfigParser.py, line 511, in get
raise NoSectionError(section)
ConfigParser.NoSectionError: No section: 'formatters'
---
  - linkcheck/configuration/__init__.py really uses logging.conf
  - The configutaion directory path is set in _linkchecker_configdata.py

* gettext .mo files
  - File entries of gettext .mo files should be marked by using
%find_lang.

* rpmlint
  - rpmlint complains:

E: linkchecker non-executable-script /usr/share/linkchecker/examples/lc.cgi 0644
E: linkchecker non-executable-script
/usr/share/linkchecker/examples/check_blacklist.sh 0644
E: linkchecker non-executable-script /usr/share/linkchecker/examples/lc.fcgi 
0644
E: linkchecker non-executable-script
/usr/share/linkchecker/examples/check_for_x_errors.sh 0644
E: linkchecker non-executable-script
/usr/share/linkchecker/examples/check_urls.sh 0644
-

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-21 20:16 EST ---
Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec
SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-5.fc7.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-18 12:11 EST ---
* Umm.. still some directories are not owned.
  Currently, the file entry of your spec file can be simplified as:
---
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-) - Please add this
%{_bindir}/linkchecker
%{_datadir}/linkchecker/
%{python_sitelib}/linkcheck/
%{python_sitelib}/_linkchecker_configdata.*
%ifarch x86_64 ppc64
%{python_sitearch}/linkcheck/
%endif
%{_mandir}/man1/linkchecker.1*
%lang(de) %{_mandir}/de/man1/linkchecker.1*
%lang(fr) %{_mandir}/fr/man1/linkchecker.1*
%doc TODO doc/ cgi-bin/ README COPYING
---

* And still gettext po files are installed.
  By the way did you check that these .po file actually don't work?

* And I noticed that the two files under /usr/share/linkchecker
  seem to be configuration files. IMO these files should be moved
  under %_sysconfdir and marked as %config(noreplace).


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-16 21:55 EST ---
Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec
SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-4.fc7.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-15 10:53 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=159277)
 -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159277action=view)
mock build log of linkchecker 4.7-3 on rawhide i386

* This time mockbuild fails again.
* And please check directory ownership issue.
  For example, the directory %{python_sitearch}/linkcheck/ is
  not owned by any package.
  Note: on i386, ppc, this directory is the same as
  %{python_sitelib}/linkcheck/ and on x86_64 and ppc64 this directory
  is also unowned (for example)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-13 12:12 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=159201)
 -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159201action=view)
mock build log of linkchecker 4.7-2 on rawhide i386

For 4.7-2:

* File entry

%{python_sitearch}/*
%{python_sitearch}/linkcheck

  - This way of listing causes many duplicate file entry
on i386 (check the mock build log attached).

* again site_lib vs site_arch
  - While arch-dependent files (usually .so file) must be installed
under site_arch directory, arch-independent .py{,o,c} files
must be installed under site_lib directory (so you have to
use both site_lib and site_arch)

* Directory ownership
  - /usr/share/man/{de,fr}/man1 are already owned by man

* rpmlint
  - Some files' permissions are not correct.
-
W: linkchecker spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/doc/examples/check_urls.sh
W: linkchecker spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/cgi-bin/lc.cgi
W: linkchecker spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/cgi-bin/lc.fcgi
W: linkchecker spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/doc/rest2htmlnav
W: linkchecker spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/doc/examples/check_blacklist.sh
W: linkchecker spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/doc/examples/check_for_x_errors.sh
-

* Documents
  * gettext files
  - /usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/doc/{de,fr}.po must be converted
by msgfmt (in gettext) and be installed into proper directories
and must not be installed as documents
  * man files
  - /usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/doc/{de,fr}/linkchecker.1 must
not be needed (man files are installed)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-12 02:18 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=159034)
 -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159034action=view)
mock build log of linkchecker 4.7-1 on rawhide i386

Some comments.

* SourceURL
  - For sourceforge source, please check the section Sourceforge.net of:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL

* Mock build fails (build log attached)
  - Note: Now .pyo, .pyc must not be excluded.

* File entry
  - The two lines
--
%dir %{_datadir}/linkchecker/
%{_datadir}/linkchecker/*
--
can be replaced with one line:
--
%{_datadir}/linkchecker/
--
  - And similarly, IMO the part # Collate list of python files
can be removed and can be simplified.

* ExcludeArch
--
# Do not have one of these to test on:
ExcludeArch: x86_64
--
  - What do you mean by this? (see sitearch comment
below)

* sitearch
  - .so module is arch-dependent and should be
installed under site_arch directory (on x86_64 and
ppc64, site_lib and site_arch directory differs)

* Requires
  - Check Requires for this package
* For example, this package requires python-docutils
* python-imaging is available on Fedora
* And maybe this package requires more packages.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links

2007-07-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-12 16:23 EST ---
Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec
SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-2.fc7.src.rpm

Implemented Mamoru's recommendations.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review