[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #20 from Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-09 09:55:49 EDT --- This package was withdrawn because eventually we dropped vservers from OLPC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-01 05:52 EST --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-01 13:14 EST --- Can the maintainer please add a cvs template here indicating what they want? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure and reset the fedora-cvs flag when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-30 22:27 EST --- Ping? I'm going to approve this review tomorrow if nobody complains. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-10 19:11 EST --- Are there any other packaging bugs that I need to fix before this package can be approved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-21 12:07 EST --- ok, now it's more clear. I'll check this next week ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-22 00:42 EST --- Thanks again for the detailed, helpful reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-19 19:14 EST --- Ah, missed that. The version of the package should be 0.3 and the release should be 1 (up the release every time you make a spec file change). If you are doing snapshot releases the version would be the next release version with a release of 0.1.dategitgit commit hash where the commit hash doesn't have to be the whole hash. I think the first ten digits is standard fare. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-19 20:04 EST --- This release should fix the version/release numbering problem. New spec file: http://dev.laptop.org/~mstone/releases/SPECS/pyvserver.spec New SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/~mstone/releases/SRPMS/pyvserver-0.3.1-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-14 15:36 EST --- This is a pre-version-1.0 snapshot (which I designated as release 0.3) because the high-level binding (pyvserver) is not yet feature-complete. However, since I am the upstream developer, I can certainly use a different release naming scheme if Fedora so requires. Also, I'm not sure that I understand your question about the tarball's name. Are you saying that it should be named something like pyvserver-1.0-0.3.tar.gz? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-11 15:30 EST --- hm... could you or upstream explain about the version of this package, i can see that its archived with version 3.0 and have an diretory with version 1.0. AFAIK, a sourcetarball is not shipped without version in .tar.gz format -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-07 14:24 EST --- This pre-release should fix the License field and the ChangeLog warning. New spec file: http://dev.laptop.org/~mstone/releases/SPECS/pyvserver.spec New SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/~mstone/releases/SRPMS/pyvserver-1.0-0.3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer
kernel interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-05 18:38 EST ---
rpmlint passes without any warnings on the srpm.
rpmlint has ChangeLog warnings on the rpm.
W: pyvserver incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-0.2.20070723git639686
1.0-0.2.20070830git1e20c7.olpc2
Summary:
looked at ctypes code which uses dlopen to find the correct library and should
work on multiarch depending on which arch version of libc is being used by
python.
ChangeLog needs updating - missing an entry
Checklist:
- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted
in the review.
Requires a ChangeLog entry, this can be done on import to CVS
- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
Ok
- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming
Guidelines.
Ok
- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Ok
- MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible
license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of
Packaging Guidelines.
Ok (GPLv2+)
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
Ok
- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
Ok
- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
Ok
- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is
unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora
is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest
(http://www.ioccc.org/).
Ok
- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
Ok
- MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms
on at least one supported architecture.
Ok - noarch
- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed
in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work
on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to
the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries
during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment
until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the
long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as
blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues:
FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64
Ok
- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion
of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
Ok
- MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
Ok (no translations)
- MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not
just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig
in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries,
each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls
/sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is:
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
Ok (No %{_libdir} libraries)
- MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
Ok (package not relocatable)
- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly
in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
(http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that
those directories exist.
Ok
- MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
Ok
- MUST: Permissions on files must be set
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-05 18:39 EST --- Did a review. It passes but I will leave it up to Xavier to approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-05 20:05 EST --- - MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok (GPLv2+) - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok This SHOULD be fix to the correct version in spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: python- |Review Request: pyvserver - |pyvserver - Python interface|Python interface to the |to the Linux-VServer kernel |Linux-VServer kernel |interface |interface Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-31 14:35 EST --- Fixed bug Summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
