[Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-13 12:19 EST --- For 1.5.2-5: * rpm name - First of all, the name of rpm should be pysvn. * pycxx dependency - This package uses pycxx 5.4.0 http://cxx.sourceforge.net/ Please file another review request for pycxx and make pysvn use system-wide pycxx. * Parallel make - Support parallel make if possible. * Timestamps - When using install or cp commands, please add -p option to keep timestamps on installed files. * Documents - License text must be included as %doc if it exists. * rpmlint - On i386: -- python-svn.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pysvn/_pysvn.so python-svn-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package -- This is because _pysvn.so does not have executional permission (the permission of _pysvn.so should be 0755) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-12 17:18 EST --- Successfully builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=419964 Updated spec and SRPM: http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/python-svn/python-svn-1.5.2-5.f8.src.rpm http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/python-svn/python-svn.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-09 10:56 EST --- This time rebuild failed with %check. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=408441 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-08 10:55 EST --- This does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=403391 Note: As this review request does not block FE-NEEDSPONSOR, you can try to build your srpm by koji scratch build as: $ koji build --scratch target srpm_you_want_to_try If the build is successful, the result rpms and some logs are put on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/your_FAS_name/task_taskid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-08 14:54 EST --- Created an attachment (id=294409) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294409action=view) Changes made to the python-svn spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-08 14:57 EST --- Err, should have been: http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/python-svn/python-svn-1.5.2-4.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-08 12:15 EST --- It looks like it is complaining about not being able to find the gssapi_krb5 library, which is part of krb5-devel. When I build it (manually) on my host after I remove krb5-devel (which also removes neon-devel and openssl-devel) it complains about needing neon-devel, which I then install neon-devel. neon-devel requires krb5-devel and openssl-devel (which *is* needed by python-svn to build), and it automatically installed when I `yum install neon-devel`. Does this not occur with koji? Do I need to specify *all* deps even though some of them are dep'd by other build deps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-08 14:57 EST --- New spec and SRPM available: http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/python-svn/python-svn.spec http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/python-svn/python-svn-1.5.2-3.f8.src.rpm (Sorry about the previous very long post, should have put that in as an attachment) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-08 12:40 EST --- Umm? [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpm -q neon-devel neon-devel-0.27.2-4.i386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpm -q --requires neon-devel /bin/sh expat-devel gnutls-devel libneon.so.27 neon = 0.27.2-4 pkgconfig rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 zlib-devel Also: [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpm -q neon-devel krb5-devel neon-devel-0.27.2-4.i386 krb5-devel-1.6.3-4.fc9.i386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpm -e --test neon-devel openssl-devel cups-devel kdelibs3-devel w3c-libwww-devel libyaz-devel kdnssd-avahi-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ neon-devel does not seem to require krb5-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-08 12:52 EST --- Adding NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-08 13:05 EST --- I'm using f8, I notice that you're using rawhide. In f8, neon deps openssl and openssl deps krb5. I'll add krb5-devel as a build-requires, I was just a little suprised to see that it failed to build in koji while it builds fine on two of my machines (but, both are x86_64 f8, so not diverse at all). $ sudo yum remove krb5-devel Loading fastestmirror plugin Loading changelog plugin Setting up Remove Process Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * livna: livna.cat.pdx.edu * fedora: mirrors.cat.pdx.edu * updates: mirrors.cat.pdx.edu Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package krb5-devel.x86_64 0:1.6.2-9.fc8 set to be erased -- Processing Dependency: krb5-devel for package: openssl-devel -- Running transaction check --- Package openssl-devel.x86_64 0:0.9.8b-17.fc8 set to be erased -- Processing Dependency: openssl-devel for package: neon-devel -- Processing Dependency: openssl-devel for package: neon-devel -- Running transaction check --- Package neon-devel.x86_64 0:0.27.2-2 set to be erased --- Package neon-devel.i386 0:0.27.2-2 set to be erased -- Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Removing: krb5-devel x86_64 1.6.2-9.fc8 installed 2.0 M Removing for dependencies: neon-devel x86_64 0.27.2-2 installed 385 k neon-devel i386 0.27.2-2 installed 325 k openssl-devel x86_64 0.9.8b-17.fc8installed 4.9 M Transaction Summary = Install 0 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 4 Package(s) Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Erasing : neon-devel # [1/4] Erasing : krb5-devel # [2/4] Erasing : neon-devel # [3/4] Erasing : openssl-devel# [4/4] Removed: krb5-devel.x86_64 0:1.6.2-9.fc8 Dependency Removed: neon-devel.x86_64 0:0.27.2-2 neon-devel.i386 0:0.27.2-2 openssl-devel.x86_64 0:0.9.8b-17.fc8 Complete! Then... $ sudo yum install neon-devel Loading fastestmirror plugin Loading changelog plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * livna: livna.cat.pdx.edu * fedora: mirrors.cat.pdx.edu * updates: mirrors.cat.pdx.edu Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package neon-devel.x86_64 0:0.27.2-2 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: openssl-devel for package: neon-devel --- Package neon-devel.i386 0:0.27.2-2 set to be updated -- Running transaction check --- Package openssl-devel.x86_64 0:0.9.8b-17.fc8 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: krb5-devel for package: openssl-devel -- Running transaction check --- Package krb5-devel.x86_64 0:1.6.2-9.fc8 set to be updated -- Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Installing: neon-devel x86_64 0.27.2-2 fedora158 k neon-devel i386 0.27.2-2 fedora152 k Installing for dependencies: krb5-devel x86_64 1.6.2-9.fc8 fedora1.1 M openssl-devel x86_64 0.9.8b-17.fc8fedora1.8 M Transaction Summary = Install 4 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 3.3 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/4): neon-devel-0.27.2- 100% |=| 152 kB00:00 (2/4): krb5-devel-1.6.2-9 100% |=| 1.1 MB00:04 (3/4): openssl-devel-0.9. 100% |=| 1.8 MB00:04 (4/4): neon-devel-0.27.2- 100% |=| 158 kB00:00 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded
