[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@christoph-wickert.de Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE Alias|miredo | --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-06-28 07:19:05 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 508523 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2008-12-22 15:56:24 EDT --- Any response from the original submitter? It's been 2.5 months now, and if there's no further response soon, I'm going to close this ticket and ask Charles to submit his own review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 --- Comment #6 from Charles R. Anderson c...@wpi.edu 2008-12-22 16:13:12 EDT --- I have been in contact with Stjepan and he agreed that I could take over the submission of this package. I was waiting for Judy to be done, which it now is. Yesterday I was going to mention that I was ready to continue working on this now, but I need to spend more time investigating the various components (miredo, miredo-server, isatapd) to figure out how to best split this package. It seems that kernels = 2.6.24 already have built-in ISATAP support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2008-12-22 16:35:56 EDT --- I'm going to go ahead and close this, since Stjepan won't be the submitter and he probably doesn't want to be spammed with the review commentary from here on out. Please go ahead and open your own review ticket when you have a package ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Bug 437626 depends on bug 465897, which changed state. Bug 465897 Summary: Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Charles R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||465897 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Charles R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||464429 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Bug 437626 depends on bug 464429, which changed state. Bug 464429 Summary: Review Request: judy - C Library for Dynamic Sparse Arrays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464429 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Charles R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #4 from Charles R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-06 21:20:54 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/miredo/miredo.spec SRPM URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/miredo/miredo-1.1.5-1.fc9.src.rpm I missed this Review Request and made my own packages above. Some differences: - I have created SysVInitScript files for the three daemons miredo, miredo-server, and isatapd. - Compiles with Judy. See Bug #464429 for a review request for that. - Disabled static libraries from building. - --enable-miredo-user allows the daemons to setid to the non-root user after initialization. I also add the user in %pre. Would you consider the above changes and co-maintainership? Splitting off miredo-server may make sense. I'll look into that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||miredo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-09 15:10 EST --- Hi - just changing this so that it blocks FE-NEEDSPONSOR rather than depending on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-05 00:05 EST --- A few comments: When you have versioned libraries like /usr/lib64/libtun6.so.0.1.1, the unversioned .so file must be in the -devel package. The non-executable-script complaints happens because the miredo.conf file starts with the usual interpreter line: #! /usr/sbin/miredo -f -c indicating that it's supposed to be executed, but the file isn't actually executable. I don't think this is a big problem, but I don't really understand why the file starts with that line. You can find nice guidelines for SysV-style initscripts at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript and for examples, just look in /etc/init.d. I would definitely advise splitting off a miredo-server package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] BugsThisDependsOn||177841 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 08:16 EST --- rpmlint gives the following messages for the base package: miredo.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libteredo.so miredo.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libtun6.so miredo.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /etc/miredo/miredo.conf 0644 But, as I understand it, dynamic libraries do not belong to development packages? Also, why is miredo.conf treated as a script when in the spec file it's explicitly marked as config? What is missing is init.d script (are there any templates? Also, there is possibility for this packate to be split into client and server packages? Should I do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
