[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 07:44:29 EDT --- qtoctave-0.8.1-0.20080823.svn165.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-01 02:40:40 EDT --- qtoctave-0.8.1-0.20080823.svn165.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #41 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-03 02:50:26 EDT --- Currently for F-10 packages are automatically pushed if you build the packages successfully. Now as I can see you have submitted push requests on bodhi, I close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-02 17:15:47 EDT --- qtoctave-0.8.1-0.20080823.svn165.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qtoctave-0.8.1-0.20080823.svn165.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-02 17:15:53 EDT --- qtoctave-0.8.1-0.20080823.svn165.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qtoctave-0.8.1-0.20080823.svn165.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #40 from Claudio Tomasoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-03 00:53:17 EDT --- Fixed VERBOSE=1, built in koji and submitted packages as newpackage in bodhi for F-8 and F-9. It's not clear what I should do to have the package in F-10. Should I follow the first section of the howto http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo ? Many thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750
--- Comment #37 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-28 10:55:22 EDT
---
Well,
* making build.log output verbose
-
make iVERBOSE=1 %{?_smp_mflags}
-
- should be:
-
make VERBOSE=1 %{?_smp_mflags}
-
* %check
(In reply to comment #36)
Should I insert
%check
ctest
even if the result is No tests were found!!! ?
- I don't think this is needed.
Please fix VERBOSE=1 issue above. As this package is already registered in
Fedora CVS
you can import this package without waiting for CVS process.
---
This package is re-approved
---
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #36 from Claudio Tomasoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 16:53:07 EDT --- Ok. The new SPEC and SRPM: Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.8.1-0.20080823.svn165.fc9.src.rpm About https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake#Specfile_Usage Should I insert %check ctest even if the result is No tests were found!!! ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750
--- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 03:02:15 EDT
---
For 0.7.5-1.svn:
* Versioning/Using svn
- When using svn based tarball, please write as comments how
you created the tarball:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
- Would you tell me whether the tarball you are using is post- or
pre- release of version 0.7.5?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release
- For svn based tarball, I prefer to use revision number rather than
the date you checked out.
* build log verboseness
- Build log output like:
--
200 [ 41%]
201 Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/basewidget.o
202 Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/codeedit.o
203 Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/variables_list.o
204 Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/command_list.o
205 [ 43%]
--
is not useful. For example, we cannot check if Fedora specific compiler
flags are honored correctly. Please refer to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake#Specfile_Usage
* Icon caching
--
47 # desktop file can't find icon
48 mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/pixmaps
49 mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/%{name}.png \
50 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png
51 rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons
--
- Please refer to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache
Resetting fedora-review flag to question mark.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #34 from Claudio Tomasoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 17:26:29 EDT --- Thanks for the comments. Before pointing to a new SRPM and SPEC file, I've got a couple of questions. - Would you tell me whether the tarball you are using is post- or pre- release of version 0.7.5? According to the news.txt file this seems to be a post-release of 0.7.5, while according to http://qtoctave.wordpress.com/2008/08/22/qtoctave-081-testing/, and to the help file this version seems to be a pre-release of 0.8.1. Which adopt? - For svn based tarball, I prefer to use revision number rather than the date you checked out. So the package should be named 0.8.1-1.svn165 (revision is 165)? Thanks in advance for your attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 22:02:10 EDT --- According to your comments I guess the current svn should regarded as the pre-version of 0.8.1 (so EVR must be 0.8.1-0.X.svn165, for example) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #32 from Claudio Tomasoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 10:19:27 EDT --- I am very sorry for the long absence, but I just stepped out from a very annoying health problem. If I can still contribute to the project, here is a new version of SPEC and SRPM file that builds in f10 too (the previous versions didn't build): Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.5-1.svn20080823.fc9.src.rpm This package builds in koji for dist-f8, dist-f9 and dist-f10. Please, let me know if I can still work on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-14 10:07:46 EDT --- Now regarding the initial reporter as not responding. To Chitlesh: If you want to take over the maintainership of this package please resubmit CVS request (note that this package is already in Fedora CVS) with including maintainer change request. If no progress happens with two weeks, I _really_ close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 09:57:43 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #30 from Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 10:20:44 EDT --- I'll step in if the reporter is not willing to maintain this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-24 13:06 EST --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-10 12:46 EST --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||asoni.it) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-30 12:44 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |asoni.it) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-22 07:49 EST --- Sorry, solved problems with ADSL provider. I'm working on this right now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||asoni.it) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-12 02:04 EST --- Well, * Please rebuild this package also on dist-f10. * For F-9/8 packages, please submit a request to push those packages to the repositories at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 11:30 EST --- Thanks. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-01 13:18 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: qtoctave Short Description: fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets Owners: claudiotomasoni Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-01 13:28 EST --- We are no longer doing F-7 branches. Do you really not want t F-9 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |asoni.it) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-24 14:53 EST --- Fixed the %setup section as indicated: Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.4-3.fc9.src.rpm I subscribed cvsextras group today and I'm waiting to be approved. In the meantime I'm going to install Fedora rawhide and take a look at qtoctave compilation problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-24 15:04 EST --- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||asoni.it) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-20 10:08 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-13 13:57 EST ---
For 0.7.4-2:
* %setup
-
%setup -q
..
tar -xf %{SOURCE1}
-
- This can be replaced by
-
%setup -q -a 1
-
(In reply to comment #14)
- So, I have drawn a little new icon (a Gauss
curve, made in qtoctave, of course) which is released under GPL and included
in
the new revision.
Much better!!
Well:
- This package is okay (please fix above)
- You have another review request, which is likely to get approved
soon
---
This package (qtoctave) is APPROVED by me
---
Please follow the procedure written on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
from Get a Fedora Account.
At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies
that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on
this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and
your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you.
If you want to import this package into Fedora 7/8, you also have
to look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT
(after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system).
If you have questions, please ask me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-13 14:07 EST --- By the way: Currently it seems that your srpm does not build on dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=607415 I don't know cmake well, however cmake maintainer says that on dist-f10 cmake (2.6.0-1.fc10) is more strict than dist-f9 cmake (2.4.8-2.fc9) which may be related to this. Also, dist-f10 qt is 4.4.0, while dist-f9 qt is 4.3.4. As current rawhide tree is very unstable so I approve this package now, however please fix this package to get it built. dist-f9 build is okay: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=606402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-12 18:12 EST --- Hi Mamoru, about last issues: - removed .fc8 from Changelog - I took the icon from an icon set downloaded from internet a lot of time ago. I guess it was freely usable, but since I can't find the original (and thus read the license), I'm not 100% sure. So, I have drawn a little new icon (a Gauss curve, made in qtoctave, of course) which is released under GPL and included in the new revision. Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.4-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-08 12:42 EST ---
2 issues
--
* Thu May 01 2008 Claudio Tomasoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.7.4-1.fc8
--
- Remove the last .fc8. This suffix is not valid for non-F9 branches.
- Would you write a explanation how you got %{name}.png?
Other things seems okay.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-07 18:12 EST --- Hi Mamoru, I've just added a comment (with a new SPEC file and a new SRPM) to the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 and this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445604 is another review request for a tiny little game named Tennix! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |asoni.it) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 09:47 EST --- Sorry for the big delay (still very annoying troubles at work :-( ). Here is a new SRPM and a new SPEC file: Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.4-1.fc8.src.rpm and these are the news: - updated to 0.7.4 - removed the qt4 explicit requirement - added a chmod command in the %prep section to fix file permissions oddity (many .cpp and .h executable files) I'm looking for a package to pre-review. In the meantime you can take a look to my other submission: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||asoni.it) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-22 11:42 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-14 12:57 EST --- Well, for 0.7.3-3: * Requires - Requires: qt4 is redundant and this should be removed. This type of Requires are automatically detected and added to rebuilt binary rpms by rpmbuild. And I will wait for your pre-review or another review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-12 14:06 EST --- Okay, seems good from a very quick check. I will look closely later. By the way, as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a pre-review of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose Merge Review) Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-10 15:44 EST --- Sorry for the delay, I've been very busy at work... All notes in the previous comment should be fixed in this release: Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.3-3.fc8.src.rpm Could you try again, please? Waiting for new comments... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-04 10:38 EST --- Still not good. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=547875 - For desktop-file-utils usage, please refer to the section desktop-file-install usage of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines - Category 'X-Fedora' is now deprecated and should be removed. - When using cp or install commands, add -p option to keep timestamps on installed files. - Calling update-desktop-database is not needed because the installed desktop file does not contain any MimeType key (ref. the section desktop-database of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets - About compilation option: -- Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/moc_command_list.o [ 42%] /usr/bin/c++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -O3 -DNDEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/usr/include/QtGui -I/usr/include/QtXml -I/usr/include/QtCore -I/usr/include/Qt -DUSER_CONFIG -DQT_SHARED -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_XML_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -o src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/moc_command_list.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/qtoctave-0.7.3/src/moc_command_list.cxx Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/moc_codeedit.o -- Here Fedora specific compilation flags uses optimization level -O2, which is overrided by later -O3 option and Fedora does not allow this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-03 12:27 EST --- Rebuild failed at least on i386: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=546584 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-03 15:25 EST --- Fixed silly errors with cmake macro (i wonder why it works at home). Could you try this update, please? Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.3-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-26 15:25 EST --- Sorry, I forgot to write that this is my first package submission, and in case I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-26 19:24 EST ---
New revision of the spec file, minor changes:
- removed %{vendor} tag from the Release field
- corrections in %changelog, due to previous point
New source rpm with the proper name (my personal tag .CT is no more included)
and not signed.
Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.3-1.139.20080425svn.fc8.src.rpm
I'm still looking for a reviewer (and a sponsor, of course). Any?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-25 16:59 EST --- Updated to cvs 0.7.3 Announce of the availability of the 0.7.3 version is here: http://qtoctave.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/version-073-in-forge/ qtoctave now uses cmake, so the spec file has been modified to compile with the new method. Now rpmlint is quiet. Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.3-1.139.20080425svn.CT.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: main |Review Request: qtoctave - |package name here - short |fronted for octave written |summary here |using qt4 widgets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
