[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714
Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|DEFERRED|
--- Comment #42 from Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net 2009-12-16
11:59:15 EDT ---
SPEC:
http://gitorious.org/lvillani/specs/blobs/master/zypp/sat-solver/sat-solver.spec
SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/sat-solver/
Notes:
- reopening since the whole ZYpp stack seems now usable with rpm = 4.6.0
- rpmlint:
[lvill...@enterprise SRPMS]$ rpmlint
../RPMS/x86_64/sat-solver{,-devel,-doc,-debuginfo}-0.14.11-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/{perl,python}-sat-solver-0.14.11-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm
./sat-solver-0.14.11-1.fc12.src.rpm ../specs/zypp/sat-solver/sat-solver.spec
7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED Flag|needinfo?(lvill...@binaryhe | |lix.net)| --- Comment #41 from Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net 2009-01-26 09:26:56 EDT --- Closing the request until upstream makes the necessary changes to libzypp to support RPM 4.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(lvill...@binaryhe ||lix.net) --- Comment #40 from Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com 2009-01-16 15:12:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) SPEC URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob;f=libs/sat-solver/sat-solver.spec;hb=HEAD SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/sat-solver-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm These URLs are not working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(lvill...@binaryhe ||lix.net) --- Comment #38 from Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com 2008-12-28 12:17:59 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(lvill...@binaryhe | |lix.net)| --- Comment #39 from Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net 2008-12-28 19:50:15 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob;f=libs/sat-solver/sat-solver.spec;hb=HEAD SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/sat-solver-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm * Sun Dec 28 2008 Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net - 0.9.6-1 - 0.9.6 - sat-solver-perl - perl-sat-solver - sat-solver-python - python-sat-solver - fix weird .spec file permissions - fix mixed use of spaces and tabs - depend on rpm 4.6.0 (ie: build on Fedora 10 only) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #36 from Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-21 00:22:21 EDT --- + RPMLint is not clean on SRPM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SOURCES]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/sat-solver-0.9.5-1.fc10.src.rpm sat-solver.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 17) sat-solver.src: W: strange-permission sat-solver.spec 0775 sat-solver.src: W: strange-permission sat-solver-db-corruption-fix.patch 0775 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SOURCES]$ RPMLint is not clean on build sub-packages: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpmlint sat-solver-perl sat-solver-perl.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The sat-solver-perl package contains libraries and perl modules to be used inside 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpmlint sat-solver-python sat-solver-python.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The sat-solver-python package contains libraries and python modules to be used inside 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ Pretty simple actually. Just replace the tab with equivalent number of spaces on line 17 of sat-solver.spec, and make sure that the files in the SRPM have a permission of 0644. Lines in the description should not exceed 80 characters. + Is this package not meant for Fedora 9? The sat-solver-0.9.5-rpm4.5.90.patch patch broke the build on my Fedora 9 system. In case it is only meant for Fedora 10 and above, you could add a versioned dependency on rpm-devel (BuildRequires) and rpm-libs (Requires) to enforce this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714
--- Comment #37 from Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-21 00:30:19 EDT
---
According to the Naming Guidelines, package names of Python modules should be
prefixed with python- or py. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29
In this case you can use:
%package -n python-%{name}
...
%description -n python-%{name}
...
%files -n python-%{name}
Similarly for the Perl sub-package consult:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28perl_modules.29
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #35 from Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-16 08:16:01 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob_plain;f=libs/sat-solver/sat-solver.spec;hb=master SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/sat-solver-0.9.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=884098 * Thu Oct 16 2008 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.5-1 - Comments on source0 origin - Removed no-bindings patch - Added perl and python bindings - rpm 4.5.90 patch - Test suite not stripped and enabled (recompressed tarball using bzip2 to save space and bandwidth) - Preserve timestamp when installing - Rationale about static libs - Removed unneeded scriptlets - Add other documentation to the main package - Remove redundant documentation files from other packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714
--- Comment #34 from Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-15 15:32:22 EDT
---
MUST Items:
OK - rpmlint is clean
OK - follows Naming Guidelines
OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec
xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines
+ The Source0 tag should have a valid URL pointing to the upstream release
tarball. This is an important requirement. In case upstream does not
provide any such tarball, the Spec should have a comment above the
Source0 tag describing how the sources were obtained to create the
package. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
+ Could you throw some light on why it is a problem to build the language
bindings on Fedora? Is it because of the ruby-rpm breakage in Rawhide?
+ Please do not strip the test-suite, if it is not absolutely necessary.
Laziness arising out of needing to upload the SRPM several times is not
a valid reason. :-)
+ It is not really necessary to create %{_target_platform}. See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake#Specfile_Usage
+ To preserve timestamps you could consider using:
make install INSTALL=%{__install} -p DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
+ Please add a comment in the Spec to document the rationale for shipping
static libraries.
+ You could consider shipping the other files in the doc/ sub-directory as
%doc. However shipping doc/PLANNING and doc/README in both the main
package and the -devel sub-package is redundant.
OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines
OK - License field meets actual license
OK - upstream license file included in %doc
OK - spec file uses American English
OK - spec file is legible
?? - sources might not match upstream sources
+ As noted earlier, please document how the sources were obtained. Place a
comment above the Source0 tag for this.
xx - package does not build successfully
+ sat-solver-no-bindings.patch does not apply cleanly and causes a build
failure in Rawhide, which uses '/usr/bin/patch -s -p0 --fuzz=0'. See:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=882707name=build.log
?? - ExcludeArch not needed
?? - missing build dependencies
+ Can not verify because package fails to build.
OK - no locales
xx - %post and %postun should not invoke ldconfig
+ Since shared libraries are not being shipped, invocation of
/sbin/ldconfig is not needed and should be removed.
OK - package is not relocatable
OK - missing dependency on package that creates directory
OK - no duplicates in %file
OK - file permissions set properly
OK - %clean present
OK - macros used consistently
OK - contains code and permissable content
OK - -doc is not needed
OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime
OK - header files in -devel
OK - static libraries in -static package
OK - no pkgconfig files
OK - no shared library files
OK - -devel does not require base package
+ Only static libraries are provided as part of the -devel or -static
package. Base package consists of only executables.
OK - no libtool archives
OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed
OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages
OK - buildroot correctly prepped
OK - all file names valid UTF-8
SHOULD Items:
OK - upstream provides license text
xx - no translations for description and summary
xx - package does not build in mock successfully
+ As noted above, package fails to build in Rawhide.
?? - package builds on all supported architectures
?? - package functions as expected
+ Other components of the Zypper stack are needed to verify functionality.
xx - scriptlets are not sane
+ As noted above, scriptlets are not needed and should be removed.
OK - subpackages other than -devel are not needed
+ -devel provides a -static package.
OK - no pkgconfig files
OK - no file dependencies
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-26 01:59:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) Lorenzo, are you sponsored and part of the packager group? Lorenzo has arbiter FAS name is sponsored by spot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #33 from Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-26 09:14:21 EDT --- I'm still willing to get the package in Fedora, the above links *should* still point to srpm and specfile, if not just tell me. Please report if there's anything wrong with the package. I got no responses for a long time but I don't want to give up ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #31 from Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-26 01:47:17 EDT --- So is anyone interested in taking over this review? Lorenzo, are you sponsored and part of the packager group? I could not locate you on this list: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/packager?search=* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #29 from Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 11:04:05 EDT --- If anyone wants to try the latest package with the included patch... It *should* fix a bug where yum, when used after zypper (or vice-versa) corrupt the RPM database. In particular it seems to not initialize the db cursor correctly. Please note that you should recompile libzypp and zypper against this version of the package. I'm testing it too, if no corruption happens in 2 days I'll assume that the issue has been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #30 from Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 11:15:25 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://omploader.org/vcDk3/sat-solver-0.9.4-4.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://omploader.org/vcDk4/sat-solver.spec Nothing exceptional, only fixed the mispelled word. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #28 from Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 15:20:03 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://omploader.org/vcDdi/sat-solver-0.9.4-3.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://omploader.org/vcDdj/sat-solver.spec * Sat Aug 23 2008 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.4-3 - removed useless requires - Added a rpm database corruption patch - Use correct URI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #27 from Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-20 09:40:04 EDT --- @Pavel Alexeev I'm sorry, the real URL is: http://en.opensuse.org/Libzypp/Sat_Solver @David A. Wheeler sat-solver is the upstream name. I just packaged it with it's original name. But I'm willing to change its name. Regarding the smoke test, I'll add that ASAP, it's more convenient than the huge test suite. @Michal Schmidt I'll remove that dependencies in 'Requires' and fix the spelling issues I am on vacation, it'll require some time to get the issues fixed. Please be patient and thanks for the interest :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Michal Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #26 from Michal Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 19:49:35 EDT --- Do you really need to specify 'Requires: expat rpm zlib'? RPM is able to pick dependencies on shared libraries automatically. I'm not a native speaker, but I'm pretty sure the word is spelled 'satisfiability', not 'satisfyability' (Wikipedia and Googlefight confirm it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||458254 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #22 from Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-07 10:44:38 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://omploader.org/vbm95/sat-solver.spec SRPM URL: http://omploader.org/vbm96/sat-solver-0.9.4-2.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Aug 7 2008 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.4-2 - Removed link to source tarball, it is not needed. Upstream distributes sat-solver, libzypp and zypper using a branched subversion tree, the tarball which comes with the SRPM is just an exported subversion checkout -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Pavel Alexeev [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #23 from Pavel Alexeev [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-07 21:06:19 EDT --- By URL in spec - http://en.opensuse.org/Libzypp/Devel I can't found any reference to sat-solver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 David A. Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #24 from David A. Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-07 21:38:53 EDT --- I'm glad to see this! Two quick notes: miniSAT, another SAT solver that's used by several other programs, is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 sat-solver is a really generic name; it's quite likely that Fedora will end up with several competing SAT solvers. Shouldn't this SAT solver's package name be something a little more specific, like libzypp-sat-solver? That would leave sat-solver as a generic name (one that might, in the future, resolve to whatever default SAT solver the user desires, a la Java implementations). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #25 from David A. Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-07 21:58:57 EDT --- In the minisat2 package I added a small test case file, which _is_ satisfiable. This would take a trivial amount of space, if you don't want to include a massive test suite. It doesn't stress the solver, but it's a reasonable smoke test to see if the solver can run: c c start with comments c c p cnf 5 3 1 -5 4 0 -1 5 3 4 0 -3 -4 0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-28 12:43 EST --- NEW SPEC URL: http://www.binaryhelix.net/sat-solver.spec NEW SRPM URL: http://www.binaryhelix.net/sat-solver-0.9.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-05 05:47 EST --- SPEC URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/libs/sat-solver.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/sat-solver-0.9.2-1.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Jul 5 2008 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.2-1 - Version bump (aligned to upstream stable version) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-05 09:31 EST --- Upstream says that they're doing such way because of the still unstable API. Since they're stabilising the API they say that they will be providing shared libraries in the near future. If you must use static libs, then at least follow the guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries Add Provides for sat-solver-static and add Buildrequires: sat-solver-static to libzypp/zypper packages. When package is included open a bug against the package regarding the static libs issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-05 10:00 EST --- SPEC URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/libs/sat-solver.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/sat-solver-0.9.2-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Jul 5 2008 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.2-1 - provide sat-solver-static -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-24 06:33 EST --- I sent an email to upstream' development mailing list but I didn't get any answer. What are we going to do if they don't respond? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-24 10:24 EST --- Upstream says that they're doing such way because of the still unstable API. Since they're stabilising the API they say that they will be providing shared libraries in the near future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-22 16:01 EST --- If you please can fix the static libs issue (ping upstream about the problem?), I would do a proper review of this package (and rest of the zypper stack (which seems in pretty good shape by the first brief look)). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 09:19 EST --- I can include them and remove that patch that disables the test suite at import-I can include them and remove that patch that disables the test suite at import-time, if needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 09:26 EST --- Uhm, sorry for the weird comment.. it seems that konqueror4 is not much usable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can
be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 14:50 EST ---
SPEC URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/libs/sat-solver.spec
SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/sat-solver-0.9.0-3.fc9.src.rpm
* Thu Jun 19 2008 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.0-3
- Using %%cmake properly
- Proper handling of %%{_includedir}/satsolver
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 16:33 EST --- The Show Bug Activity link should tell you everything you need to know about the history of this ticket. As far as I can tell, this ticket has never been assigned to anyone and Jochen isn't even CC'd on this ticket so he wouldn't see any of the remarks. Note that we do have some cmake information: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake I would not approve this package without the test suite being included and run at build time unless that's just not possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 17:38 EST --- Yes, I should check the bug history and not blindly trust the comment #7. But I think all my points are still valid. Our Wiki has a lot of answers for technical questions. And I have a personal experience with Jochen as reviewer and I know that it can take weeks before he returns to the review. The tests could be perhaps omitted for package iterations that should clean the general packaging issues but then they should be added back. Reduced size can really help both sides when they are using e.g. ADSL. But I agree with Jason - if they can be run, they must be included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 06:12 EST --- A reviewer assigned this package to himself, then he didn't reply to my questions. Releasing the package and restoring the fedora-review flag to empty value. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can
be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 06:50 EST ---
Reviewing a package is a volunteer process, so you cannot expect that there are
no delays in the communication. So removing a reviewer is at least unpolite.
Now some answers
- %{_includedir}/satsolver - this includes both the directory and the files in
the directory (and any deeper hierarchy), so use it
- $RPM_OPT_FLAGS - there should be a way how to pass own CFLAGS into the compile
process done with cmake, I think/hope :-)
- static libraries - then you should investigate, how to enable building of
shared libraries, using static libs is allowed only in very very special cases
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 06:58 EST --- If I remember correctly he assigned then de-assigned the bug to himself (or he didn't assign the bug to himself at all!) but he left the fedora-review flag to '?'. The reviewers guidelines state that the reviewer must set fedora-review to '?' AND assign the bug to himself. This bug was not assigned to anybody but the flag was set to '?', as a consequence I restored the default value for fedora-review flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-09 08:56 EST --- Building on x86_64 gives the following error during rpmbuild: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/zypp/zypp-query-pool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-09 08:58 EST --- Sorry, the above comment should have been on libzypp, not sat-solver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-09 13:50 EST --- SPEC URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/libs/sat-solver.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/sat-solver-0.9.0-1.fc9.src.rpm * Mon Jun 09 2008 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.0-1 - Version bump -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can
be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
Flag||fedora-review?, needinfo?
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-09 14:53 EST ---
Good:
+ Local build works fine on x86_64
+ Rpmlint on source package is quite
+ Consistent macro usage
+ package use a OSS license
+ Tar archive in the package matches with upstream
(md5sum: 52bc1b0309812eead630f8dfe795c923)
+ Rpmlint is quite on sat-solver package
+ File permissions seems ok.
+ Package seems not to have files own by other packages.
+ Local install and uninstall works fine.
+ Package build fine in mock (xu6_64, ppc64 and ppc, devel)
Bad:
- %{_includedir]/satsolver should be own by the package
- Package should not contains static libraries
- Package doesn't contains license text, but upstream package contains a
verbatin copy of the license.
- Rpmlint complaints on devel package:
$ rpmlint sat-solver-devel-0.9.0-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
sat-solver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
- Package seems not to use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
Questions:
? Why you remove the testsuite. From my point of view this may be helpful to
ensure the QA of the package
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can
be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
Flag|needinfo? |
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-09 16:23 EST ---
Before uploading a new version of the package I need something to be explained:
Bad things:
- %{_includedir}/satsolver: As far as I know, %{_includedir}/satsolver/* gives
ownership to directory-contained files
- static libraries: as far as i know, upstream build system (based on cmake)
only produces static library archives and not shared objects and it seems that
other packages depending on this library statically link the library in their
final executable
- verbatim copy of the license: I included that in both packages using %doc
- rpmlint warning with sat-solver-devel: the inclusion of the verbatim copy of
the license should fix this
- $RPM_OPT_FLAGS: This is due to usage of cmake, afaik, using
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=FEDORA is sufficient, I added that to the cmake line
And now the questions:
I removed the *huge* testsuite (nearly 50MiB of stuff -compressed-) just to save
bandwidth (yes, I'm lazy), If needed I can keep the testsuite inside the tarball
but this will make the review process much slower because i'll have to upload
~100MiB of compressed tarballs (~50MiB of .src.rpm and ~50MiB of packaged
snapshot).
Side notes:
As far as I know both sat-solver, libzypp and zypper can be retrieved only from
upstream' subversion (or by 'extracting' source tarball from SuSE' .src.rpm) so
the source archive is just a local subversion checkout with SCM directories
stripped out (ie: tar'ed using --exclude-vcs)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||447740 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||447738 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-20 14:22 EST --- SPEC URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/libs/sat-solver.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/sat-solver-0.0.33-1.fc9.src.rpm * Tue May 20 2008 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.0.33-1 - Version bump -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
