[Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 David Nielsen dniel...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX --- Comment #11 from David Nielsen dniel...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-28 05:56:13 EDT --- Due to inactivity since 2008-10-20 I am closing this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 --- Comment #10 from David Nielsen gnomeu...@gmail.com 2009-02-21 08:34:32 EDT --- With MD2 beta 1 out and Fedora now containing a new succesful build of MD are you still interested in this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 --- Comment #9 from Paul F. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-20 07:58:04 EDT --- Unable to build due to problems with MD 1.9. This should be resolved in the next couple of weeks with MD 1.9 alpha 2's release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-08 05:08 EST --- just trying to get MD2 to build and then i'll return to these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-30 20:25 EST --- Ping, it has been nearly 2 months now Paul. Again I offer any help you might need to hammer Mono into shape. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-12 05:10 EST --- Should be okay to do -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-12 05:18 EST --- (and as usual this applies to the other Monodevelop-* packages you have under review as well). Paul what is holding this up and is it anything I can help with, I would be very interested in seeing Mono get better in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-12 05:31 EST --- The only thing really holding anything up is waiting for rawhide to open again and then all of the mono packages can be brought in. I have a plan to get my mono packages unified down to F8 for the end of June -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-11 10:43 EST --- as of June 13th F7 will no longer be supported which means you'd only need to push mono-addins to F8 and then we could lose the test plus many applications including the one I care about the most, Banshee 1.0 would be able to be pushed to all our stable platforms. Any thoughts on how feasible that would be? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-07 06:31 EST --- Fails to build, configuration script specifically checks for monodevelop = 1.0 which we don't have and the spec check is not versioned. This review must thus block on monodevelop 1.0 inclusion (I'm hoping that does not cause circular dependency issues). You need the standard ExclusiveArch line for Mono apps: ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ia64 armv4l sparc alpha ppc As the package contains absolutely no .boo files, I wonder why this requires boo in the first place. If I ask politely will you name the patch after it's function and add comments to your sed magic to make it easier to follow for those of us who maintain your packages lightly while you are away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-07 06:39 EST --- Yeah., it'll be down to needing a newer monodevelop than is already there. I'll fix the other stuff up for you as well. Thanks for doing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
