[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-02-19 04:10:24 EDT --- Imported and build. Thanks for review CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system Alias: mon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 Bug 455168 depends on bug 455174, which changed state. Bug 455174 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mon - Mon Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455174 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system Alias: mon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system Alias: mon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-23 03:55 EST --- Package is ok. citation If upstream cannot be convinced, it may be wise to search over the internet for packages that already use that name and think about which one should keep the main name, and a prefix or postfix can be used in fedora if disambiguation is needed. /citation I agree with previous posts, but name Mon is already used in debian. Different names for programmes in different distros are definitely bad thing and make users angry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system Alias: mon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-23 04:06 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) Generally speaking 3 letter projects do call for trouble, but in this case we are dealing with the 'original (at least I know about it for several years). I do not think changing it's name just for fedora is worth the effort It's also what I said in Comment #6. I have no objection about having this package called mon in fedora, it is the best choice in my opinion, but at the same time, I try to raise awareness about name collisions in the distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system Alias: mon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-23 08:23 EST --- Patrice: Thanks for your suggestion, and activity in field of avoiding package name clashes. I recently hit about the same problem with two projects called plexus and wished the upstream would have thought twice before picking a name, so I especially appreciate your efforts. Marcela: Much thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mon Short Description: General-purpose resource monitoring system Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system Alias: mon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-23 11:57 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system Alias: mon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-20 16:55 EST --- mon is a known project with a well established name, coming from a reputable source. Generally speaking 3 letter projects do call for trouble, but in this case we are dealing with the 'original (at least I know about it for several years). I do not think changing it's name just for fedora is worth the effort and I more than welcome packaging it in Fedora, especially if an EPEL version is also taken into consideration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review-Request: mon - |Review-Request: mon - |General-purpose resource|General-purpose resource |monitoring system |monitoring system --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-13 07:43 EST --- mon.i386: E: non-readable /etc/mon/userfile 0600 mon.i386: E: setgid-binary /usr/lib/mon/mon.d/dialin.monitor.wrap uucp 02755 mon.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/mon/mon.d/dialin.monitor.wrap 02755 These are intentional. mon.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/mon $prog mon.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/mon $prog mon.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/mon $prog False positive, $prog == mon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-13 08:29 EST --- In my opinion, a 3 letter package name is calling for trouble. I try to give reasons here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Use_of_common_namespace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-13 09:04 EST --- Patrice: Thanks for comment. Though your opinion is more-or-less reasonable, there's a guideline for naming packages after names of upstream projects. Do you suggest an alternative name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||455174 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system Alias: mon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||mon-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system Alias: mon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-13 10:12 EST --- My suggestion would be first to contact upstream and present them the arguments, 'explaining that in fedora we have to consider a broader perspective of a mix of packages of unknown size.' And if it fails then look over the web if there are already existing clashes, if so try to weight which should have precedence and find the name accordingly (it may end up being 'mon'). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system Alias: mon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-13 11:02 EST --- Changing the upstream name is out of question here, I'd say, especially in case of a well-established project with generally recognized name. Picking the package name of first come -- first serve basis is perfectly just here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system Alias: mon-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-13 11:29 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) Changing the upstream name is out of question here, I'd say, especially in case of a well-established project with generally recognized name. Picking the package name of first come -- first serve basis is perfectly just here. No, it is not. The name should always be specific. First come first serve is not playing nice with other potential softwares. That being said, this project is the oldest and well established, so the name should certainly be used for that project. But still, contacting upstream about the genericity of the name would seem to be better to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
