[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net 2009-01-01 06:22:33 EDT --- Thanks Michal and Kevin! I've rebuilt 8.1.0 for devel, but pushed an older 0.2.0 + patch on F-9, F-10 and EL-5 since those don't have Twisted 8 yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Bug 457219 depends on bug 450227, which changed state. Bug 450227 Summary: Updated Twisted packages please https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450227 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-31 00:50:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219
--- Comment #15 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2008-12-29 07:37:26
EDT ---
Matthias,
excellent, now that you updated Twisted to 8.1.0 in Rawhide, we can hopefully
get web2 in too. I'll re-review your latest package today. There's one thing I
noticed immediately on the first line of the spec file:
%{?!python:%define python python}
Looks like switched order: ?! - !?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219
--- Comment #16 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2008-12-29 10:18:55
EDT ---
Please fix the !?/?! confusion.
I suggest adjusting Summary and %description. Upstream no longer calls Web2 the
next generation framework, they now call it experimental. According to
http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/TwistedWeb2 they are merging its
functionality into Twisted-Web. When they're done, Web2 will be obsoleted.
Everything else looks OK. Details:
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
python-twisted-web2.src: I: checking
python-twisted-web2.x86_64: I: checking
python-twisted-web2.x86_64: E: no-binary
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
OK. This error is expected here and should be ignored.
# MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK.
# MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
OK.
# MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK.
Checked: Naming, Legal, No pre-built binaries, Spec legibility, Arch support,
Filesystem layout, Rpmlint, Changelogs, BuildRoot (it's not the most preferred
form, but it's one of the allowed ones, and RPM 4.6 ignores it anyway),
Requires, BuildRequires, Summary and description, Encoding, Documentation,
Debuginfo packages, Duplication of system libraries, Macros, Timestamps,
Scriptlets requirements, File and Directory Ownership, Conflicts, No External
Kernel Modules, No Files or Directories under /srv, Bundling of multiple
projects
N/A: Compiler flags, Shared Libraries, Exclusion of Static Libraries, Beware of
Rpath, Configuration files, Initscripts, Desktop files, Handling Locale Files,
Parallel make, Conditional dependencies, Relocatable packages, Code Vs Content,
Users and Groups, Web Applications,
# MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
OK. MIT license.
# MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
OK.
# MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
OK.
# MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK.
# MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK.
# MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
OK. 4a03e62453037b009ee5f0e1396be792249b9e2f TwistedWeb2-8.1.0.tar.bz2
# MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
OK. Builds in Koji on all archs:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024731
# MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
N/A.
# MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK.
# MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
N/A.
# MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
N/A.
# MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package.
N/A.
# MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
OK.
# MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
OK.
# MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
OK.
# MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ).
OK.
# MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines .
OK.
# MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is
described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines .
OK.
# MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #17 from Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net 2008-12-29 15:02:40 EDT --- Thanks for the review! The switched !? comes from a copy/paste from the other twisted packages, where it was reversed. I had fixed them, but missed web2. I've now fixed it and updated the description and summary. I didn't bother bumping the release for such minor changes, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2008-12-29 16:13:07 EDT --- OK, the latest spec file is fine. Setting flag fedora-review+. You can request CVS branches for the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net 2008-12-29 17:20:10 EDT --- Great, thanks! I'm being optimistic by requesting extra branches, but I really hope we get Twisted updated on them at some point. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-twisted-web2 Short Description: Experimental Twisted Web Server Framework Owners: thias Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #14 from Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net 2008-12-23 17:44:57 EDT --- Since we're still early in the Fedora 11 release cycle, and since I think the impact will be minor (and even possibly positive), I've pushed twisted 8 packages to devel (see bug #450227). I've also slightly updated my web2 package, which can be found at the same location. So it should now be possible to fully test things on devel. Michal : Could you have another look at my latest package? http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/python-twisted-web2/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #13 from Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-29 06:53:14 EDT --- Note that Elisa seems to be tested primarily on Ubuntu, where the web2 version is a 0.2.x snapshot IIRC. The compatibility of Elisa with twisted 8 is something that seems to be worked on. See : https://bugs.launchpad.net/elisa/+bug/214227 CC'ing Thomas from now on too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #11 from Michel Alexandre Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-28 13:45:12 EDT --- The elisa update requires python-twisted-web2 which requires python-twisted-core 8, so we can remove that from the list. Elisa requires python-nevow and python-Coherence as well, so presumably they work with the new Twisted. londonlaw is more or less dead upstream; Flumotion comes from the same people as Elisa so is probably safe too. So the list is narrowed down to buildbot, postr, pyicq and supybot. Yay. Should we Cc: Thomas on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #12 from Paul Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-28 15:40:20 EDT --- Yes, I think Thomas certainly needs to be Cc:-ed, especially since it'll be up to him to update Twisted Core. I think he's upstream for flumotion too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 05:59:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Do you have an updated python-twisted-core package one can test this with? I need it to review elisa-plugins-bad I don't, but I was planning on working on it if ThomasVS (the twisted package maintainer) didn't have time for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Paul Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 07:56:38 EDT --- I have some twisted packages you could use for testing here: http://mirror.city-fan.org/ftp/contrib/bittorrent/Twisted/ They're fairly close to the Fedora packages but updated to 8.x versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 12:40:20 EDT --- Thanks for that. Has the topic of Twisted been brought up in -devel? From Paul's page it looks like almost nothing depend on the old version anymore, so we can even avoid having to do a compatibility package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #10 from Paul Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 20:13:16 EDT --- I asked Thomas about his upgrade plans for Twisted when he bumped it from 2.4 to 2.5 in May when 8.0 was already out. He said: I'm doing it staged - apparently for some code mixing python 2.5 and twisted-core 2.4 is not a good idea, so I wanted to fix this upgrade path first. Then next I will check the new twisted release and verify it works with current twisted-using projects. So I think Thomas is aware of some pitfalls that we don't know about. The twisted-using packages I see in Fedora currently (apart from the python-twisted-* packages themselves) are: buildbot-0:0.7.7-2.fc9.noarch elisa-0:0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch flumotion-0:0.4.2-5.fc9.x86_64 londonlaw-0:0.2.1-3.fc9.noarch postr-0:0.10-2.fc9.noarch pyicq-t-0:0.8-5.b.fc9.noarch python-nevow-0:0.9.29-2.fc9.noarch python-Coherence-0:0.5.0-1.fc9.noarch supybot-0:0.83.3-7.fc9.noarch (this is from repoquery --enablerepo=development --whatrequires python-twisted-core --alldeps) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Michel Alexandre Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-26 14:44:43 EDT --- Do you have an updated python-twisted-core package one can test this with? I need it to review elisa-plugins-bad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Michal Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Michal Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-19 05:46:05 EDT --- I'm interested in python-twisted-web2 because a new version of Jabbim will need it. I'll do the review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-19 05:56:55 EDT --- Great. Note though that I've had a report that seemed to indicate that some parts of web2 8 don't work with the version of Twisted currently in Fedora, so it might be required to update all other Twisted components to version 8 too first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219
--- Comment #3 from Michal Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-19 08:18:58 EDT
---
If there really are known bugs when used with old Twisted core, consider adding
a versioned dependency on python-twisted-core in Requires and BuildRequires and
make BZ450227 'Updated Twisted packages please' block this bug.
You can use '--install-purelib %{python_sitearch}' like python-twisted-web does
it instead of moving the files. Then you won't need to define python_sitelib.
python-twisted-web calls %{_libexecdir}/twisted-dropin-cache in %post and
%postun. Are they needed in this package too?
Checking ReviewGuidelines MUST Items:
- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
The package built successfully in mock.
$ rpmlint -vi *.rpm
python-twisted-web2.src: I: checking
python-twisted-web2.x86_64: I: checking
python-twisted-web2.x86_64: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
There is a valid reason why the package is arch-specific. This rpmlint error
should be ignored.
OK.
- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
The name is consistent with the names of other Twisted components in Fedora.
OK.
- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines
.
OK.
- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
The Guidelines specify that any relevant documentation should be included in
the package. The upstream tarball contains a doc/ directory which is not
included in the package.
PLEASE FIX.
- MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
MIT license.
OK.
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
OK.
- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
OK.
- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
I see just one little error in Description: s/it's APIs/its APIs/
- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
sha1sum matches: 4a03e62453037b009ee5f0e1396be792249b9e2f
OK.
- MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one supported architecture.
OK.
- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
N/A
- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional.
OK.
- MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
N/A
- MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just
symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in
%post and %postun.
N/A
- MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package.
N/A
- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
OK.
- MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
OK.
- MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
OK.
- MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ).
OK.
- MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines .
OK.
- MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
OK.
- MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage.
N/A
- MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application.
OK.
- MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
N/A
- MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
N/A
- MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability).
N/A
- MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
N/A
- MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-19 09:07:59 EDT --- Thanks! About the Twisted compatibility, the parts that I have looked at do seem to work (with elisa), so I'd be interested in knowing if this package, with the older other Twisted packages currently found in Fedora, work for the application that you need it for. Find updated files in the same location : * Tue Aug 19 2008 Matthias Saou http://freshrpms.net/ 8.1.0-3 - Use --install-purelib option instead of manually moving the installed files. - Fix description. - Include doc/ directory, although it would fit best in a devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||450227 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-19 09:18:09 EDT --- Oh, about the call to twisted-dropin-cache. It might be needed, but having tried it now, I can see that web2 definitely needs some newer Twisted components, as it gives the following error on the current Fedora 9 : exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name ServiceMaker So I'm adding a dependency on bug #450227 and will add the proper runtime requirements to the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||438609 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
