[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo pablo.martin-go...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #37 from Martin-Gomez Pablo pablo.martin-go...@laposte.net 2009-04-24 16:15:09 EDT --- As it seems that the packages have been uploaded and pushed in Bodhi, I close this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #36 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-28 19:35:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #35 from Ankur Sinha ankursi...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-23 09:23:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: oldstandard-sfd-fonts Short Description: Old Standard True-Type Fonts Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-21 19:40:47 EDT --- Ankur, what is your FAS account name? You should use the same email address for bugzilla and FAS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-21 19:36:58 EDT --- According to this review Ankur needs a sponsor? and the first package can only be approved by one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #34 from Ankur Sinha ankursi...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-21 21:32:05 EDT --- hi, It's ankursi...@fedoraproject.org. I have changed change my bugzilla login email to it. I do need a sponsor. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #29 from Ankur Sinha sanjay_an...@yahoo.co.in 2009-01-20 07:44:49 EDT --- hi, Made the change. packages : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo pablo.martin-go...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #30 from Martin-Gomez Pablo pablo.martin-go...@laposte.net 2009-01-20 12:55:04 EDT --- Great ! The package is now APPROVED by me ! Congrats ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #31 from Ankur Sinha sanjay_an...@yahoo.co.in 2009-01-20 13:14:21 EDT --- :D my first approved package! thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #28 from Martin-Gomez Pablo pablo.martin-go...@laposte.net 2009-01-08 18:00:09 EDT --- Ok, for me, the spec file is now ok. Just about the fontconf, change the sans-serif to serif. I will test the building this week-end. I will surely approved this package on Sunday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #26 from Ankur Sinha sanjay_an...@yahoo.co.in 2009-01-04 11:07:40 EDT --- hi, packages : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm same warning with the rpm for this package too : oldstandard-sfd-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-oldstandard.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-oldstandard.conf hope its okay other than that. @pablo : ive just really replaced the font name and generic name etc in the fontconfig template that nicolas has given. I dont exactly understand it. hope its okay other than that.. regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-04 11:20:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) same warning with the rpm for this package too : oldstandard-sfd-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-oldstandard.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-oldstandard.conf You can ignore this warning for now, it's not even sure if we'll keep in in Fedora rpmlint http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Absolute_symlinks_in_fonts_templates_%282009-01-02%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-29 06:03:04 EDT --- The new official templates have removed explicit post and postun in font specs because packagers were messing it up, review couldn't catch all the problems, and the fontconfig maintainer was unhappy at font packagers. Conversion of existing packages to new templates is ongoing and some still use the old conventions. Please make this new package conformant to the new packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947
--- Comment #24 from Martin-Gomez Pablo pablo.martin-go...@laposte.net
2008-12-28 16:22:16 EDT ---
* I don't understand the following code, eventually, it should be
stringserif/string, no ?
match target=pattern
test name=family
stringsans-serif/string
/test
/match
* Put the following codes in section %prep after %setup (and not in %build or
in %install):
for txt in OFL* ; do
sed 's/\r//' $txt $txt.new
touch -r $txt $txt.new
mv $txt.new $txt
done
install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE2} .
* Do the %post and the %postun are useful ? I just find them in some fonts and
no wiki page about it. Nicolas, an explanation ?
* Now, the change needed by the new guideline:
- Add the following in the right place :
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
- Remove %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} and replace all the
%{fontdir} by %{_fontdir} (it's now an official macro)
- Replace %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/60-%{fontname}.conf and
%{fontdir}/*.ttf by %_font_pkg -f 60-%{fontname}.conf *.ttf
(- There is something else with templatedir macro, but i don't understand how
it work, i'll see)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #23 from Martin-Gomez Pablo pablo.martin-go...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 18:39:29 EDT --- I have some problems with a /home partition corrupted currently. I will try to review this this week. It seems that we are near to the end of the review :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947
--- Comment #22 from Ankur Sinha sanjay_an...@yahoo.co.in 2008-12-15
06:02:10 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
The doc on changelog doesnt tell me which ones dist and which ones
version.. :(
so i havent changed that in this one.. (pablo please help me with this)
It's quite simple to understand, for exemple, your spec:
Version:1.1
Release:1%{?dist}
The number after Version: is the version one, it's given by upstream and you
must not change it. So put 1.0 as it's the version of the font.
The Release: number is a distro/package specific number, so each time you
add
an entry in the changelog, you increment by one this number. So currently, it
should be 3%{?dist}.
Also your changelog format is not correct, you have to add your email address
as said in the guidelines
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs).
The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that?
You should add the code proposed by Nicolas in the review request of the
bonveno fonts in the %prep section .
You have many font substitution examples in the dejavu font packages. Do not
forget to declare your font is an acceptable substitute for all the
different
Old Standard variant out there (TTF, OTF, etc)
Ok, so you have to duplicate the XML code I gave you, and just change the
first
familyOld Standard/family to familyOld Standard TTF/family.
For register this font as a serif one, add the following to the fontconfig
file:
alias
familyserif/family
prefer
familyOld Standard SFD/family
/prefer
/alias
hi,
sorry for the delay.. Fedora 10 got me stuck up a bit.. Here are packages.. I
used the new source the author has uploaded.. Also the FONTLOG in the src zip
has version 2.0.2 so i used that in the spec.
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-19 17:25:53 EDT --- you have an example of separate pdf included as %doc in the yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts As for the changelog, I'm sure Pablo would be happy to help you, if you told us precisely what your changelog problem was. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947
--- Comment #21 from Martin-Gomez Pablo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-19
17:58:24 EDT ---
The doc on changelog doesnt tell me which ones dist and which ones version..
:(
so i havent changed that in this one.. (pablo please help me with this)
It's quite simple to understand, for exemple, your spec:
Version:1.1
Release:1%{?dist}
The number after Version: is the version one, it's given by upstream and you
must not change it. So put 1.0 as it's the version of the font.
The Release: number is a distro/package specific number, so each time you add
an entry in the changelog, you increment by one this number. So currently, it
should be 3%{?dist}.
Also your changelog format is not correct, you have to add your email address
as said in the guidelines
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs).
The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that?
You should add the code proposed by Nicolas in the review request of the
bonveno fonts in the %prep section .
You have many font substitution examples in the dejavu font packages. Do not
forget to declare your font is an acceptable substitute for all the different
Old Standard variant out there (TTF, OTF, etc)
Ok, so you have to duplicate the XML code I gave you, and just change the first
familyOld Standard/family to familyOld Standard TTF/family.
For register this font as a serif one, add the following to the fontconfig
file:
alias
familyserif/family
prefer
familyOld Standard SFD/family
/prefer
/alias
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #19 from Ankur Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-18 23:44:40 EDT --- hi, updated the packages.. I did look at the pdf that youve mentioned.. I couldnt figure how to include it though, tried a few things but got stuck with errors.. here are the packages.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Can you tell me how to change the changelog please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-17 04:43:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that? You have many examples of txt frobbing in the gfs font specs. Pablo can help you if needed. Also I'd have added http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstand-manual.pdf in %doc Also is there a better documentation for fontconfig rules somewhere? I'm not aware of better documentation than http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips or I wouldn't have bothered writing it in the first place Again do ask your reviewer (Pablo) or the list if you have problems understanding part of it. It's a wiki and it can be fixed. It's no use leaving obscure parts in it for other packagers to fail on. You have many font substitution examples in the dejavu font packages. Do not forget to declare your font is an acceptable substitute for all the different Old Standard variant out there (TTF, OTF, etc) Otherwise the fontconfig info in there http://nim.fedorapeople.org/rpm-fonts/rpm-fonts-1.8.tar.bz2 should apply as-is for Fedora versions 11 (but not the rest) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-17 00:02:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) (In reply to comment #15) ping ? pong! hi.. have end semester exams so a little tied up.. will do it this week for sure.. hi, sorry for the delay.. rebuilt with the changes advised by Pablo.. here are the new files.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec The doc on changelog doesnt tell me which ones dist and which ones version.. :( so i havent changed that in this one.. (pablo please help me with this) The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that? Also is there a better documentation for fontconfig rules somewhere? regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Ankur Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |o.co.in)| --- Comment #16 from Ankur Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-09 14:23:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) ping ? pong! hi.. have end semester exams so a little tied up.. will do it this week for sure.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #15 from Martin-Gomez Pablo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-09 13:58:33 EDT --- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #14 from Martin-Gomez Pablo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-28 13:20:15 EDT --- Some comments: 1- When you make a change, you increase the Dist number, not the Version one's. 2- Paste the following after the %setup for i in $(ls OldStandard*.ttf.sfd); do sed -i -e 's/OldStandardTT/OldStandardSFD/' -e 's/Old Standard TT/Old Standard SFD/' $i; done It's the renaming of the font just before the building. 3- A little improvement to the fontconfig rules, add the following : alias binding=same familyOld Standard/family accept familyOld Standard SFD/family /accept /alias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |69oldstandard-fonts - Old |oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old |Standard Fonts |Standard Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
