[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #20 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2008-12-18 09:40:53 EDT --- Confirmed, contacted upstream on this, will be properly resolved until this hits fedora-X-testing. Temporary fix in place now. * Thu Dec 18 2008 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com - 0.3.2-1 - 0.3.2 - remove rpath (x86-64) - xcb_keysyms: remove xcb_lookup_t - Revert keysyms: use xcb_key_lookup_t type for col paramter - temporary disabled %%check due to RPATH regression Soon in rawhide. Thanks for report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #21 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2008-12-18 16:09:00 EDT --- xcb-util-0.3.2-1.fc11 successfully built in Koji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #22 from Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz 2008-12-18 19:43:24 EDT --- Ops, sorry for noise, NEXTRELEASE is proper resolution of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xja...@fi.muni.cz --- Comment #19 from Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz 2008-12-15 19:11:23 EDT --- Hm, is it just me seeing rpaths here? rpmbuild --rebuild xcb-util-0.3.1-2.fc11.src.rpm ... + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot *** * * WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH and will cause 'rpmbuild' * to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the '$QA_RPATHS' * environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the values * below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x. * *0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor * issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without * providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib * environments. *0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute * nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk *0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a * SECURITY risk *0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other * RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted *0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs * and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries *0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break * the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink * * * Examples: * - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like * $ QA_RPATHS=$[ 0x0001|0x0010 ] rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm * - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like * $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT=top-dir /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths * *** ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/libxcb-wm.so.0.0.0' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/libxcb-image.so.0.0.0' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/libxcb-icccm.so.1.0.0' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/libxcb-property.so.1.0.0' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] Please fix them accordingly to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-06 22:28:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-05 04:59:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xcb-util Short Description: Convenience libraries sitting on top of libxcb Owners: mnowak Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-04 06:49:29 EDT --- You didn't picked the summaries from Comment #6? Otherwise rpmlint is right, given that known problem is fixed upstream: xcb-util.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libxcb-aux.so.0.0.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] xcb-util-devel.i386: W: no-documentation * follow guidelines * free software, license corrected, not included, but not included upstream either * library rightly packaged * match upstream 4b06006e438c3926d077439b31d290d6 xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 * %files section right * sane provides 2 issues: URL should be http://xcb.freedesktop.org/ source tarball timestamp not kept: -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 265979 nov. 24 00:33 ../SOURCES/xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 265979 nov. 20 15:36 xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 APPROVED if you fix the 2 issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #13 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-04 07:31:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) You didn't picked the summaries from Comment #6? Now I do. Thx for them. Otherwise rpmlint is right, given that known problem is fixed upstream: xcb-util.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libxcb-aux.so.0.0.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] xcb-util-devel.i386: W: no-documentation In -2 I have a patch for this from upstream git. * follow guidelines * free software, license corrected, not included, but not included upstream either It is included. (The copyright patch.) * library rightly packaged * match upstream 4b06006e438c3926d077439b31d290d6 xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 * %files section right * sane provides 2 issues: URL should be http://xcb.freedesktop.org/ Fixed. source tarball timestamp not kept: -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 265979 nov. 24 00:33 ../SOURCES/xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 265979 nov. 20 15:36 xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 Should be in -2. APPROVED if you fix the 2 issues. Please, do so. -- http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util.spec http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util-0.3.1-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #14 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-04 09:35:23 EDT --- Everything is alrigth, I confirm my approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-04 09:50:10 EDT --- Patrice, thank you for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-05 00:13:32 EDT --- Please add a cvs template here for what you want and reset the fedora-cvs flag to ? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-28 18:35:02 EDT --- License issue fixed, patch included in package upstream git repo. * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/xcb-util/xcb-util-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/xcb-util/xcb-util.spec Known problem: xcb-util.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libxcb-aux.so.0.0.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] see: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18808 Runs fine with awesome. Ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID|FreeDesktop.org 17078 | --- Comment #10 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 12:24:10 EDT --- The license problem is now resolved upstream. Will publish xcb-util-0.3.1 with the patch (http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xcb/util/commit/?id=7ba0d2c98a6fc033dc1edfd791cfacdace4eab51) soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||FreeDesktop.org 17078 --- Comment #9 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-13 04:37:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) The license issue is unfortunately a blocker. Sure. Pinged on upstream BZ. Another comment is that, in my opinion, it is better in general to have make variables passed as make arguments and not as shell env variables (though both work with gnu make), like: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL=install -p That sounds reasonable. * Mon Oct 13 2008 Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.3.0-3 - move from system env vars to local GNU make ones http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util.spec http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util-0.3.0-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #8 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 18:18:37 EDT --- The license issue is unfortunately a blocker. Another comment is that, in my opinion, it is better in general to have make variables passed as make arguments and not as shell env variables (though both work with gnu make), like: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL=install -p Not a blocker. Otherwise I haven't seen anything obviously wrong by glancing at the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784
--- Comment #7 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-06 05:08:08 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #6)
You could use
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' to keep
header files timestamps.
Improved.
You could do make check in %check.
Done.
rpmlint output is ignorable:
xcb-util-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
I'd propose a shorter summary:
Convenience libraries sitting on top of libxcb
And for the devel summary I propose:
Development and header files for xcb-util
Both done.
There is a license issue, wm/reply_formats.c notice refers to COPYING
which isn't present.
Probably somewhat more of such problems, see
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17078 ...
In rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.la, the -r is not needed. And the
-f isn't needeed too, I prefer personnally being warned when a file
I had to remove isn't present anymore.
Good idea, why not. Done.
http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util.spec
http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util-0.3.0-2.el5.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784
Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #6 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-03 14:52:33 EDT
---
You could use
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' to keep
header files timestamps.
You could do make check in %check.
rpmlint output is ignorable:
xcb-util-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
I'd propose a shorter summary:
Convenience libraries sitting on top of libxcb
And for the devel summary I propose:
Development and header files for xcb-util
There is a license issue, wm/reply_formats.c notice refers to COPYING
which isn't present.
In rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.la, the -r is not needed. And the
-f isn't needeed too, I prefer personnally being warned when a file
I had to remove isn't present anymore.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-19 06:47:05 EDT --- Updated to v 0.3.0: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/xcb-util/xcb-util.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/xcb-util/xcb-util-0.3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm (necessary for bug 452427) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #4 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 14:47:58 EDT --- Thanks for noting that, Jason. I completely forgot on BuildRequires. * Sun Aug 17 2008 Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.2.1-2 - new build deps: gperf, pkgconfig, libxcb, m4, xorg-x11-proto-devel - not installing *.a files anymore - configure with --with-pic * Spec URL: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util.spec * SRPM URL: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util-0.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-16 13:16:04 EDT --- Fails to build for me in rawhide: checking for gperf... no configure: error: Can't find gperf, please install it and try again fixing that with a build dep on gperf, I get to: checking for XCB... configure: error: Package requirements (xcb = 1.0) were not met: No package 'xcb' found Adding libxcb-devel gets up to: Making all in atom make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xcb-util-0.2.1/atom' I. atoms.gperf.m4 atoms.gperf /bin/sh: I.: command not found make[1]: [atoms.gperf] Error 127 (ignored) gperf --output-file atoms.c atoms.gperf atoms.gperf: The input file is empty! make[1]: *** [atoms.c] Error 1 and at that point I don't know what to do. Please make sure your packages build in mock or koji before submitting them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||452427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Customer Facing||--- --- Comment #1 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 06:04:41 EDT --- There are some sort of legal issues because of source files do not have proper license statements. It's being solved. (However it's in Debian already.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #2 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 06:05:02 EDT --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/xcb-util-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/xcb-util-0.2.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/xcb-util-devel-0.2.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/xcb-util-debuginfo-0.2.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm xcb-util.spec xcb-util-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
