[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-07 04:25:55 EDT --- pfstools-1.7.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-07 04:37:47 EDT --- pfstools-1.7.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||pfstools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-05 15:17:52 EDT --- pfstools-1.7.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstools-1.7.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-05 15:17:57 EDT --- pfstools-1.7.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstools-1.7.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-04 15:36:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Ulrich Drepper drep...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Ulrich Drepper drep...@redhat.com 2009-01-02 13:58:09 EDT --- I've added the one BuildRequres. This means I should be ready to uild it for the distribution. Thanks for the review. http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools-1.6.5-5.fc10.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #23 from Ulrich Drepper drep...@redhat.com 2009-01-02 14:00:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pfstools Short Description: Programs for handling high-dynamic range images Owners: drep...@redhat.com Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #24 from Ulrich Drepper drep...@redhat.com 2009-01-02 16:32:09 EDT --- I've updated to the most recent upstream release: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools-1.7.0-1.fc10.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools.spec One more subpackage is build and I added the appropriate new BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||459946 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-06 09:14:27 EDT --- APPROVED fix the missing buildrequire. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||459945 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #19 from Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 12:54:07 EDT --- [I'm traveling again...] (In reply to comment #17) *now=not, updated=update, funde=files *tpyo erorr, I am durnck ;-) Not a good to refer to kajo data, it gets removed at ta short while. I didn't see it. Re the documentation: I added some more files but they really are not necessary. As I said before, it's stupid on rpmlint's part to insist on doc files for all these packages. The -libs subpackage still doesn't have any but this is just fine. There is nothing to say. Anybody who needs to know more will find the main package, pfstools, and read the docs there. Find the latest srpm and spec file here: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools-1.6.5-4.fc9.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #20 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 20:53:54 EDT --- I never did a complete review. It failed at that time, to build. Reason: + /bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/pfstools-mDATA.patch + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 -b --suffix .mDATA --fuzz=0 + aclocal /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DDk9s1: line 41: aclocal: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DDk9s1 (%prep) RPM build errors: Misses buildrequire automake. I will do a complete review shortly. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #18 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-04 01:34:59 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #15 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-22 12:13:14 EDT --- I had to been shifting to another place ... sorry for delay on my side ... I will get back to it in a day with complete review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #16 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-22 15:08:49 EDT --- Fails build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=896281 [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmls * | grep faq [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmls * | grep pfs_format_spec.pdf [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ documentation is still now included. Please updated with doc folder funde installed. rpmlint tells me some packages need docu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #17 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-22 15:10:13 EDT --- *now=not, updated=update, funde=files *tpyo erorr, I am durnck ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #14 from Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-12 14:41:37 EDT --- I've uploaded a new .spec file and .src.rpm. Sorry for the delay, too many things happening at the same time. http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools-1.6.5-3.fc9.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools.spec When I run rpmlint I still get some warning: $ rpmlint -i RPMS/x86_64/pfstools*-1.6.5-3.fc9.x86_64.rpm pfstools-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. pfstools-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. These should be fine. The documentation files for the -libs and -devel package are the same as for the main package. No need to duplicate them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-29 05:43:35 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #13 from Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-29 10:32:42 EDT --- I've been travelling the last weeks. Will get to it ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-10 04:12:33 EDT --- Package builds successfully. Waiting for update on above comment. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-10 04:11:39 EDT --- rpmlint is still not clean. May you explain, if there are certain warnings which you are really ignoring and why ? Thanks, [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmlint -i pfstools-libs-1.6.5-2.fc9.i386.rpm pfstools-libs.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. pfstools-libs.i386: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmlint pfstools-octave-1.6.5-2.fc9.i386.rpm pfstools-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfs_write_rgb.m pfstools-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfs_read_luminance.m pfstools-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfs_read_xyz.m pfstools-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfs_close_frames.m pfstools-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfsview.m pfstools-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfsview_rgb.m pfstools-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfs_read_rgb.m pfstools-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfs_open_frames.m pfstools-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfsview_list.m pfstools-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfssize.m 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 0 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmlint -i pfstools-devel-1.6.5-2.fc9.i386.rpm pfstools-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. pfstools-devel.i386: W: no-dependency-on pfstools/pfstools-libs/libpfstools 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #7 from Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-08 01:09:08 EDT --- I've updated the SPEC file with the proposed changes and a few more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-08 01:28:08 EDT --- May you upload your srpm also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #9 from Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-08 01:53:47 EDT --- There is a new file: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools-1.6.5-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Customer Facing||--- --- Comment #1 from Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-03 10:27:28 EDT --- Anybody going to volunteer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-03 11:06:54 EDT --- Expect a review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944
--- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-03 11:16:27
EDT ---
There are rpm build errors:
RPM build errors:
File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/pfstools-1.6.5-2.fc10.x86_64/usr/bin/pfsinppm
File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/pfstools-1.6.5-2.fc10.x86_64/usr/bin/pfsoutppm
-- these two files do not seem to be built
File listed twice:
/usr/libexec/octave/3.0.1/site/oct/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/pfstools/pfsclose.oct
File listed twice:
/usr/libexec/octave/3.0.1/site/oct/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/pfstools/pfsget.oct
File listed twice:
/usr/libexec/octave/3.0.1/site/oct/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/pfstools/pfsopen.oct
File listed twice:
/usr/libexec/octave/3.0.1/site/oct/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/pfstools/pfsput.oct
File listed twice:
/usr/libexec/octave/3.0.1/site/oct/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/pfstools/pfsread.oct
File listed twice:
/usr/libexec/octave/3.0.1/site/oct/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/pfstools/pfstransform_colorspace.oct
File listed twice:
/usr/libexec/octave/3.0.1/site/oct/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/pfstools/pfswrite.oct
-- %{_libexecdir}/octave/*/site/oct/*/pfstools/*.oct must be removed
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-03 11:39:33 EDT --- The missing files are built if netpbm-devel is added as BR. There are also a couple of other issues: rpmlint of pfstools-glview: pfstools-glview.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot GL-based viewer for HDR files. pfstools-glview.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsglview ['/usr/lib64'] rpmlint of pfstools-imgmagick: pfstools-imgmagick.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot ImageMagick file import for PFS tools. pfstools-imgmagick.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsinimgmagick ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools-imgmagick.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsoutimgmagick ['/usr/lib64'] rpmlint of pfstools-octave: pfstools-octave.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfs_write_rgb.m pfstools-octave.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfs_read_luminance.m pfstools-octave.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfs_close_frames.m pfstools-octave.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfsview.m pfstools-octave.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfsview_rgb.m pfstools-octave.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfs_read_rgb.m pfstools-octave.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfs_read_xyz.m pfstools-octave.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfs_open_frames.m pfstools-octave.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfsview_list.m pfstools-octave.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/octave/3.0.1/site/m/pfstools/pfssize.m pfstools-octave.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Octave interaction with PFS tools. rpmlint of pfstools-devel: pfstools-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation pfstools-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on pfstools/pfstools-libs/libpfstools pfstools-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Files for development with PFS tools. rpmlint of pfstools-exr: pfstools-exr.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot EXR file import for PFS tools. pfstools-exr.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsoutexr ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools-exr.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsinexr ['/usr/lib64'] rpmlint of pfstools-qt: pfstools-qt.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Qt-based viewer for HDR files. pfstools-qt.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsview ['/usr/lib64'] rpmlint of pfstools-libs: pfstools-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation pfstools-libs.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Libraries for HDR processing. pfstools-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 rpmlint of pfstools: pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsflip ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsabsolute ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsextractchannels ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfspad ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsoutpfm ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfssize ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsclamp ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsrotate ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfspanoramic ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsoutppm ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsouttiff ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsinpfm ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsgamma ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfscut ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsinrgbe ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsoutrgbe ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsinppm ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfsintiff ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfscat ['/usr/lib64'] pfstools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pfstag ['/usr/lib64'] In addition to the above, some packages seem to include GUI tools, so desktop file[s] should be provided and you have forgottem to package the license file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-03 11:41:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=315654) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315654) modified spec this spec fixes the missing BRs, removes some duplicate files and preserves timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-03 11:55:21 EDT --- @Ulrich As soon as you update srpm on above issues. I will start my review. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
