[Bug 462580] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580 Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|Reopened| Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|462923 |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(guth...@counterex | |ample.org) | --- Comment #6 from Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-29 07:09:45 EDT --- Well, nothing happens. No response. I close this now. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462580] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580 Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thom...@fedoraproject.org Flag||needinfo?(guth...@counterex ||ample.org) --- Comment #5 from Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-04 05:38:25 EDT --- What exactly means soon in this case? The last response is already 5+ months ago. Are you still with us or is it now dead? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462580] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580 John Guthrie guth...@counterexample.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #4 from John Guthrie guth...@counterexample.org 2009-04-01 09:47:52 EDT --- I apologize for the non-response. I've been looking on a search results page for someone to actually assign this review request to themselves. (It would be nice if there was some way to get last time modified into search results on bugzilla.) Anyway, I am re-opening this bug and I will have a response to the issues brought up soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462580] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(guth...@counterex | |ample.org) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462580] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(guth...@counterex ||ample.org) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-03-24 22:44:07 EDT --- It's been a long time since the previous comment with no response; I'll close this soon if nothing happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462580] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580
Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 08:03:17
EDT ---
This package didn't build in mock for me (fedora-9-i386); amid a lot of
warnings was the following error:
[javac] 98. ERROR in
/builddir/build/BUILD/wstx/src/java/com/ctc/wstx/evt/WAttribute.java (at line
97)
[javac] public String getDTDType() {
[javac] ^^
[javac] The return type is incompatible with Attribute.getDTDType()
If I build (locally) with OpenJDK instead of GCJ, it builds fine, so this seems
to be an incompatibility in the signature of that method. Not sure what the
solution is.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462580] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580 --- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 08:12:05 EDT --- While I'm at it, here are some rpmlint warnings on the OpenJDK-built packages: wstx.i386: W: no-documentation (probably not an issue, but should some of the files from the manual subpackage maybe be included as documentation in the main package?) wstx.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/wstx (should it be marked %config(noreplace) ?) wstx.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency msv-xsdlib (false positive because of the package name matching *lib*) wstx.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java (should be Development/Libraries?) wstx-j2me.i386: W: no-documentation (no big issue) wstx-j2me.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java (== Development/Libraries ?) wstx-javadoc.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation (== Documentation ?) wstx-manual.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/wstx-3.1.1/CREDITS (run iconv on it during the build: inside %prep: iconv -f CREDITS tmp.utf8 mv tmp.utf8 CREDITS ) wstx-manual.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation (== Documentation ?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462580] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580 John Guthrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||462923 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
