[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-02 13:10:15 EDT --- dfu-util-0.1-0.8.20090307svn4917.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.1-0.8.20090307svn4917.fc1 ||0 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-16 15:36:37 EDT --- dfu-util-0.1-0.8.20090307svn4917.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dfu-util'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2693 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-13 10:39:33 EDT --- dfu-util-0.1-0.8.20090307svn4917.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dfu-util-0.1-0.8.20090307svn4917.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:16:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #15 from Juha Tuomala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-19 09:12:16 EDT --- Pong. I'm active again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Juha Tuomala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-19 09:24:04 EDT --- fedora-cvs ? flag is not enough, you should to follow PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #17 from Juha Tuomala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-19 09:30:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dfu-util Short Description: USB Device Firmware Upgrade tool Owners: tuju jreznik Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: tuju -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-16 16:31:51 EDT --- Ping. Juha, you should move further (I mean, create cvs request, import into Fedora cvs, build, etc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 08:35:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320799) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320799) simple patch for spec file keep timestamp of man page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #13 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 08:39:17 EDT --- Juha have you done any other work in fedora (comment on reviews, other submissions, and anything else) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140
Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-04 10:12:16
EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: FC-9 / i386
[x] Rpmlint output: clean
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv2+
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Sources from SVN, commented properly in SPEC file. Diff againts sources in
SRPM and sources download is OK.
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR:
Arches excluded: x86_64, ppc64, sparc64
Why: upstream is broken for 64 bit architectures
After approval fill bugs blocking FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[-] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: koji dist-fc8 dist-fc9 dist-fc10
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: koji dist-fc8 dist-fc9 dist-fc10
[x] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
APROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #8 from Juha Tuomala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-23 11:36:07 EDT --- kernel Opening USB Device 0x1d50:0x5119... Claiming USB DFU Runtime Interface... Determining device status: state = appIDLE, status = 0 Device really in Runtime Mode, send DFU detach request... Resetting USB... Opening USB Device... Found Runtime: [0x1d50:0x5119] devnum=40, cfg=0, intf=0, alt=3, name=kernel Claiming USB DFU Interface... Setting Alternate Setting ... Determining device status: state = dfuIDLE, status = 0 dfuIDLE, continuing Transfer Size = 0x1000 bytes_per_hash=39279 Starting download: [##] finished! state(2) = dfuIDLE, status(0) = No error condition is present Done! Resetting USB to switch back to runtime mode testing, it works fine. ... Transfer Size = 0x1000 bytes_per_hash=1069547 Starting download: [##] finished! state(2) = dfuIDLE, status(0) = No error condition is present Done! Resetting USB to switch back to runtime mode that was rootfs. after boot attempt, the kernel wont start either. $ arch;rpm -q dfu-util x86_64 dfu-util-0.1-0.5.20080922svn4662.fc9.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #9 from Juha Tuomala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-23 12:34:10 EDT --- okay, at least on 32bit fedora9 it works if: - write kernel - write rootfs - switch off + unplug USB cable - boot booting straight from uboot does not work after rootfs download. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #10 from Juha Tuomala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-23 12:42:53 EDT --- Also note that for some reason I need to boot through the u-boot menu using AUX button before powering up the device. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #1 from Juha Tuomala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-22 04:36:07 EDT --- Note that there is bug #211761 in review pipeline, but it has different upstream http://dfu-programmer.sourceforge.net/ and looks like they are different beasts. dfu-util is used in openmoko project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Juha Tuomala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://wiki.openmoko.org/wi ||ki/Dfu-util -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-22 06:16:54 EDT --- First quick look: - version mismatch * dfu-utils -V says dfu-util version 0.1+svnexported, newer SVN sets revision instead exported - Summary: ended with dot, see rpmlint - licence problem * dfu-util is GPLv2+ * dfu-backup is GPLv3 * SPEC file states GPLv2 * split package? use GPLv3? I don't know... - URL: I think better is http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Dfu-util (the SPEC's one is more generic, this one is for dfu-util program). - Source0: it's from SVN? so you should add comment how to obtain source codes... and better - ask upstream for proper release of 0.1 version - Source1: missing URL, where can I download it? and again, splitting packages should be option? - Requires: libusb is unneeded? - Description: In addition to firmware... line is too long, see rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #3 from Juha Tuomala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-22 09:17:45 EDT --- Btw, this package compiles just okay on x86_64, but is reported *not* to work properly and thus i386 arch binary should be used on x86_64 too as long that is solved. I'm not yet familar how it's done, probably with bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #5 from Juha Tuomala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-22 09:25:14 EDT --- Comment #2: - Requires: libusb is unneeded? # rpm -q --requires dfu-util libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libusb libusb-0.1.so.4 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Yes, it's needed. Is there a problem with it? You mean it would do it with brp-requires automatically? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-22 09:49:18 EDT --- - I don't know how to solve x86_64 issues... You have to use ExcludeArch for not supported architectures. - Version should be GPLv2+ - Update Changelog release note - It's not building in mock/koji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #4 from Juha Tuomala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-22 09:20:53 EDT --- http://tuju.fi/tmp/fedora/dfu-util/dfu-util-0.1-0.1.20080922svn4662.fc9.src.rpm http://tuju.fi/tmp/fedora/dfu-util/dfu-util.spec % rpmlint /home/tuju/PKGS/SRPMS/dfu-util-0.1-0.1.20080922svn4662.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - Version fixed. - Summary dot removed. - license fixed by dropping the dfu-backup. - url fixed. - Source0 fixed. - Source1 removed. - Description reshaped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #7 from Juha Tuomala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-22 10:31:52 EDT --- http://tuju.fi/tmp/fedora/dfu-util/dfu-util-0.1-0.4.20080922svn4662.fc9.src.rpm http://tuju.fi/tmp/fedora/dfu-util/dfu-util.spec http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=836151 rpmlint does not complain anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
