[Bug 463229] Review Request: ACE Banners Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463229 Bryan Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Bryan Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-02 15:12:28 EDT --- Combining this package into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 as a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463229] Review Request: ACE Banners Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463229 --- Comment #4 from Bryan Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-24 09:28:55 EDT --- Updated the packages per the review of the ace pakacge Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/ace-banners.spec SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/ace-banners-0.0.3-3.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint clean koji build clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463229] Review Request: ACE Banners Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463229 --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-23 16:05:18 EDT --- Is there a better way to package puppet recipes than this? It seems having umpteen subpackages isn't the way to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463229] Review Request: ACE Banners Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463229 --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-23 16:23:56 EDT --- I would be happy to discuss real time to find on. The goal is to have the appliance ship with all the correct packages, and not have to call home at initial start up. For that reason, puppet is not used to require packages.. the spec file is. So each subpackage will have a puppet module, and a set of requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463229] Review Request: ACE Banners Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463229 --- Comment #3 from Bill Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-23 16:40:46 EDT --- Right, but... - You've got these weird puppet modules that have initimate knowledge of the configuration details of their apps (file locations, etc.). Why not package them in some form with the app itself? How much will they need changed if the apps themselves change? - A separate source package for every single module you may want in a appliance sounds like bloat. Are they really intended to be released independently? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
