[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-07 17:19:30 EDT --- mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 07:58:03 EDT --- This has now been built in Rawhide, F-10 and EL-5. Thanks for everybody's help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Bug 467416 depends on bug 467405, which changed state. Bug 467405 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 467416 depends on bug 467376, which changed state. Bug 467376 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-28 07:05:00 EDT --- Waiting for bug 467376 (mingw32-pixman). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-26 10:00:34 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/cairo/mingw32-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-4.fc11.src.rpm * Mon Jan 26 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.8.0-4 - Disable freetype in configure so it doesn't break if freetype or fontconfig are actually installed. (Erik van Pienbroek). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-26 10:17:37 EDT --- This is just updated to remove the unused rm -f in the install section: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/cairo/mingw32-cairo.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-01-26 14:14:20 EDT ---
On with the final checklist :)
$ rpmlint mingw32-cairo.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-4.fc11.noarch.rpm
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-win32.h
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-ps.h
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-deprecated.h
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo.h
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo.pc
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libcairo.dll.a
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libcairo.dll.a
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-version.h
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo-win32-font.pc
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo-win32.pc
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo-png.pc
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-features.h
mingw32-cairo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libcairo.la
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-pdf.h
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-svg.h
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo-svg.pc
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo-ps.pc
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo-pdf.pc
mingw32-cairo.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libcairo.dll.a
mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 18 warnings.
All these rpmlint warnings and errors can be ignored.
You might want to fix the spurious-executable-perm warning, but this isn't a
blocker for the review
--
$ curl http://cairographics.org/releases/cairo-1.8.0.tar.gz | md5sum
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current
Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed
100 5529k 100 5529k0 0 329k 0 0:00:16 0:00:16 --:--:-- 391k
4ea70ea87b47e92d318d4e7f5b940f47 -
$ md5sum ../SOURCES/cairo-1.8.0.tar.gz
4ea70ea87b47e92d318d4e7f5b940f47 ../SOURCES/cairo-1.8.0.tar.gz
--
$ rpmquery --requires mingw32-cairo
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
mingw32-filesystem = 43
mingw32-runtime
mingw32(gdi32.dll)
mingw32(kernel32.dll)
mingw32(libpixman-1-0.dll)
mingw32(libpng12-0.dll)
mingw32(msvcrt.dll)
mingw32(user32.dll)
mingw32(zlib1.dll)
-
+ OK
- Needs to be looked into
/ Not applicable
* Overridden by MinGW guidelines
[+] Files are installed in /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw
[+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem = xx is in the .spec file
[+] Requires are OK
[+] BuildArch: noarch
[+] No man pages or info files
[+] No static libs
[+] default strip and objdump commands are overridden with mingw32 specific
ones
[+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-26 15:03:28 EDT --- Thanks Erik. I've added the 'Requires: pkgconfig' to my local copy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-26 15:04:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-cairo Short Description: MinGW Windows Cairo library Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-26 17:15:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Bug 467416 depends on bug 478640, which changed state. Bug 478640 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-01-23 13:14:16 EDT --- The compilation of this package fails when the Linux version of fontconfig and freetype are installed: i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -I/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libpng12 -Wall -Wextra -Wsign-compare -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -Wpacked -Wswitch-enum -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Winit-self -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wold-style-definition -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-attributes -Wno-long-long -Winline -fno-strict-aliasing -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -MT cairo-type1-subset.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/cairo-type1-subset.Tpo -c cairo-type1-subset.c -DDLL_EXPORT -DPIC -o .libs/cairo-type1-subset.o In file included from cairo-ft-private.h:40, from cairo-type1-subset.c:54: cairo-ft.h:46:35: error: fontconfig/fontconfig.h: No such file or directory cairo-ft.h:47:22: error: ft2build.h: No such file or directory To fix this, the option '--disable-ft' needs to the added to the %configure With this change, the %install command to remove the cairo-freetype pkgconfig file can also be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-19 05:14:55 EDT --- I can have a look at this one today unless Dan jumps in before me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|467396, 467413 |478640, 467325, 454416 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-19 14:44:24 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/cairo/mingw32-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-3.fc10.src.rpm * Mon Jan 19 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.8.0-3 - Include license file in documentation section. - Disable building static library to save time. - Remove BRs on mingw32-fontconfig and mingw32-freetype which are not needed on Win32. - Use _smp_mflags. - Added BRs mingw32-dlfcn, mingw32-iconv, mingw32-zlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com 2009-01-18 13:15:28 EDT --- The reason I let it pull in Freetype/fontconfig is that this matches the deps from the Linux native specfile I was trying to keep as closely aligned as possible. Likewise for removing the charset.alias this is just matching native. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-01-18 13:34:46 EDT --- As I see it, fontconfig and freetype are really required for Cairo on Linux enviroments (as they are considered 'native' for Linux). However, for Windows environments there's a Cairo font backend available which uses the native font rendering functions from the Win32 API. To me it looks like adding dependencies on freetype and fontconfig only introduces unncessary bloat for a Win32 build of Cairo. Are there any specific reasons why you want to add dependencies on fontconfig and freetype? Applications (like GTK+) shouldn't really care about the font backend used by Cairo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
Bug 467416 depends on bug 467397, which changed state.
Bug 467397 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng
library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397
What|Old Value |New Value
Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-01-17 09:18:58 EDT ---
I see you've used these commands in the %install phase:
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mingw32_libdir}/charset.alias
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mingw32_libdir}/libcairo.a
Why is the charset.alias file removed?
Why haven't you used %configure --disable-static to prevent building the static
library?
Do we really want to pull in freetype and fontconfig as a dependency? Cairo
provides a native Win32 implementation for font rendering, so I guess adding a
dependency on freetype and fontconfig only introduces unnecessary bloat.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-17 09:53:59 EDT --- Dan Berrange is probably in a better position to comment on these questions since he did the original packaging. Why haven't you used %configure --disable-static to prevent building the static library? Yes, that's a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-01-17 11:20:32 EDT --- Do you know if he's reading along this review ticket or should he be CC'ed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:39:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/cairo/mingw32-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Bug 467416 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-24 07:51:47 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=61ed5375fc06e8f0e5ec89100f59cd46024c4a8a;path=/cairo/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-1.fc9.src.rpm New upstream version 1.8.0. This is quite an important update because it fixes a number of related segfaults in client programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Depends on||454410, 467405, 467376, ||467396, 467397, 467413 Alias||mingw32-cairo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||467419 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||467420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
