[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||INSUFFICIENT_DATA Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #24 from Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au 2009-01-31 20:18:58 EDT --- I'm closing this bug: Reason : No simulator currently available under fedora If the situation changes, I will still be interested to push OVM into fedora repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Frank Ch. Eigler f...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||f...@redhat.com --- Comment #21 from Frank Ch. Eigler f...@redhat.com 2009-01-30 14:10:34 EDT --- Re. comment #19, As sysadmin I would definitely have preferred to do yum install ovm.el4 instead of tar xzf ovm-2.0.tar.gz Until that time, you could make a local yum repo and publish the RPM there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #22 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com 2009-01-30 14:56:10 EDT --- FESCo has voted to continue to block this content, on the basis that it does not enhance the OS user experience. Imagine this: I'm Joe User, who wants to use ovm. I type 'yum install ovm iverilog' and expect to be able to do whatever ovm does (and I'll have to admit ignorance as to exactly what this is - I'm not a hardware guy). I find that I can't do that, and instead have to buy some expensive proprietary tool in order to make use of this free content. We're fine with the concept of ovm being in Fedora, but we also want something that is able to use this content, even if it's at a very primitive level that no one actually *would* use it in a production environment. The link that Chitlesh posted earlier to upstream iverilog forums seemed to indicate that they had other priorities other than making this work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #23 from Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au 2009-01-30 16:25:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) not having iverilog in means that ovm is only available to a subset of people who have access to the closed proprietary tools. We want you to get this in, all we are asking is to provide a way for everyone to use the content. even if for now its limited in functionality. iverilog is under the fedora umbrella since one or two years. perl-Verilog has incorporated early perl support of SystemVerilog http://www.veripool.org/search/index/verilog-perl?q=systemverilog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #18 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-01-29 20:50:24 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content If the content enhances the OS user experience, then the content is OK to be packaged in Fedora. that is why we said that we would like to have iverilog or some other tool for using the content in at the same time. understanding that the tools still have a way to go and are far from feature complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #19 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-29 21:12:50 EDT --- I see no relation between If the content enhances the OS user experience, then the content is OK to be packaged in Fedora and the user experience must be provided only by free tools. Would iverilog be nice to have? Definitely yes. Should its presence at the same time with OVM be mandatory ? Absolutely not. Users might be using EDA software from other sources. Actually I bet that 99% percent of them are using commercial tools and I also bet that in an enterprise environment they always will. small rant on In the company I work for we use several commercial EDA tools. Since July 2008 the number of engineers interacting with OVM increased from 2 to 25 and their number will increase in the future [, depending on the projects that end / new projects that start]. How would not the presence of OVM in a repository enhance these users' experience ? As sysadmin I would definitely have preferred to do yum install ovm.el4 instead of tar xzf ovm-2.0.tar.gz For what it's worth and completely unrelated, we have a very small team of courageous people who use gtkwave from EPEL when the number of licenses for the commercial tool is insufficient. rant off -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #20 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-01-29 23:36:11 EDT --- the user experience must be provided only by free tools. goes with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview Fedora is all about freedom and rapid innovation. it goes against fedoras goals of Fedora will always be free for anybody, anywhere, to use, modify and distribute. not having iverilog in means that ovm is only available to a subset of people who have access to the closed proprietary tools. We want you to get this in, all we are asking is to provide a way for everyone to use the content. even if for now its limited in functionality. Our intention is not at all to keep this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-28 19:30:41 EDT --- Well, you are welcome to bring it up again to FESCo, but the decision made last time was that something that could at least potentially use the content should be added at the same time as this content package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #17 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-28 19:54:40 EDT --- Unfortunately I cannot attend FESCo's IRC meetings due to overlapping with personal matters, but I must stand on Chitlesh's side here (ref #14 )) and support him. I for one would have loved to use a rpm for OVM at the time that I deployed the software in the company I work for (see #3). And no, except for a few minor tools, the game around real EDA has no open-source players, all big boys use products from one of the three major players in the market. Stalling even the few available open source packages because in this moment there is no free tool to use them is just an administrative block and with no support in any of the guidelines I know of. Note that this is the exact opposite case of games with free engines but encumbered game data (which was downloaded at install time from links outside our repos): this time we have free content but no free engine to use it with. Pushing the content _might_ speed up the engine and harm no one; on the contrary we would once again be the leader of the movement. No content at all will definitely not help anyone. It's like saying Look, we have free oranges ! Take as many as you want ! but you reply No, I will not eat your oranges unless someone provides a free knife for peeling them, too ! Or in a geeky speak, Here, have some free beer ! No, thank you, I cannot accept it, I have no free bottle opener! And for what it's worth: 10 days ago I had the opportunity to attend a meeting with a manager working for one of the top 3 EDA tools manufacturers mentioned above. It just happened that his next meeting scheduled during that week was with the other players of the OVM game, in view of releasing OVM 2.1. In other words, there is a real incentive over this project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tummy.com --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:35:18 EDT --- Given that fesco wanted tools at the same time, would you like to hold off on cvs until one of those is ready also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #12 from Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au 2009-01-23 18:59:52 EDT --- well, it won't happen before 6 months. the intention of pushing it into fedora was to encourage EDA developers develop tools around it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #13 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com 2009-01-23 19:41:58 EDT --- Right, the intent was to get iverilog (there's some code I can download from their webpage) into Fedora, realizing that it might not be usable with this particular content for 6 months. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au 2009-01-23 20:58:42 EDT --- Yes, this is the current status. --- Forget software for a moment : For any hardware designer, the basic design methodology is : design - home made customized scripts - EDA tools this combination gives = developing hardware (with at least 12 different EDA tools to sign off a project) This somehow differs from the popular software methodology: code, compile and run. The questions you might be asking are : - why complain when companies have opensourced their libraries ? (forget the opensource community, the later will _never_ give you such verification methodology before the next 20 years, because it costs millions of euros to develop it) - can these libraries(text files) be incorporated directly into the user's HDL design? You may have heard open hardware and opensource community are proud of it. If you look closer (opensparcT2 for example) at the code, this open hardware was designed under proprietary eda tools, same applies to opencores designs. I believe building an opensource design and simulation platform -FEL- (providing software), with inclusion of ovm and vmm, will encourage digital designers extend their open hardware desire to design open hardware with open source software. This is a problem and a lack in the current opensource software and hardware communities. The only way to solve it is someone has to step in first and take the lead. With our FEL we have already taken this leadership to promote open source _content_ and ovm is an open source _content_. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #15 from Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au 2009-01-23 21:08:57 EDT --- Maybe from mailing posts with respect to OVM : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=iverilog-devel will clarify any of your doubts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Thibault North thibault.no...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #9 from Thibault North thibault.no...@gmail.com 2009-01-22 14:18:19 EDT --- Review completed: * Naming is okay, * Licencing is ok, * Paths are ok, * Chmods are ok, * Install scripts are ok. rpmlint doesn't find errors or warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au 2009-01-22 17:06:25 EDT --- Package Change Request === Package Name: ovm Short Description: Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #7 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com 2009-01-17 15:49:51 EDT --- FESCo believes that this is of value. However, we'd like to see iverilog or other similar tools for dealing with this content in at the same time, realizing that those tools might not be useful right now, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 17:39:43 EDT --- So, just to be clear... this is content that is only useful with proprietary applications, right? There is no relevant guideline to match this. Our emulator policy is the inverse (you can include the FOSS emulator, if there are FOSS ROMS). I think this needs to go to FESCo for review (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content): All content is subject to review by FESCo, who has the final say on whether or not it can be included. I'll put this on FESCo's radar. For what it is worth, I support including this FOSS licensed content, as it enhances the OS user experience has an open source compatible license, and is not legally questionable, the main three barriers for content inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jonstan...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com 2009-01-12 17:48:30 EDT --- Will be discussed in the next FESCo meeting (1/16 - noon EST, 17:00UTC) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au 2009-01-12 18:10:32 EDT --- Thanks, I just want to remind FESCo, that ovm is used in high end commercial simulators and its apache 2.0 license and its inclusion in fedora will help in the creation of tools around ovm by the community. Other opensource upstream projects can update their simulators accordingly. Someone has to make the first step. Currently there are some tools (in alpha version) which are available online, however too early for normal usage. If ovm is approved by fedora, I'll also bring in vvm which is in the exact situation as ovm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-05 05:45:48 EDT --- I just happened to have the tar.gz downloaded (and in use since Sept..) so I guess a quick review cannot hurt. So: fast forward review for release 1.fc11: * RPM name is OK * This is the latest version * sha1sum is OK /mnt/arhive/2/EDA/mentor/OWM/ovm-2.0.tar.gz db292f605d77b14d09ddb0f461942493be18d148 ovm-2.0.tar.gz from spec: db292f605d77b14d09ddb0f461942493be18d148 * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * works OK (in use since Sept, as I have said) at least with Questa From my point of view, it's OK. Eventually it could go to RPMFusion if legal says no go here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235 Depends on|182235 | --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au 2008-12-12 13:24:51 EDT --- Including into fedora will help upstream of iverilog and verilog to support ovm in their future releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||182235 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-06 05:50:28 EDT --- Current, ovm can only be used with proprietary software. I am still searching a way to find an opensource systemverilog simulator that supports ovm. One short note: Cadence and Mentor Graphics, the whole EDA leaders have developed and released this ovm under the apache 2 license. http://edageek.com/2008/12/04/systemverilog-synopsys/ http://edageek.com/2008/12/04/vmm-ovm-verification/ http://www.cadence.com/Community/blogs/fv/archive/2008/12/04/vmm-users-welcome-to-the-ovm.aspx So, my only concern is whether fedora allows its inclusion or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Thibault North [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
