[Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-02-20 06:44:43 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1274 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-04 21:14:25 EDT --- qtgpsc-0.2.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qtgpsc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-04 21:13:46 EDT --- qtgpsc-0.2.3-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update qtgpsc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1274 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org 2009-01-28 12:15:15 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: 3e7bf8b2bd2e21c5082a52a37e381046 qtgpsc-0.2.3.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary a short and concise description. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is sane. NOT OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane: qtgpsc = 0.2.3-1.fc11 qtgpsc(x86-64) = 0.2.3-1.fc11 = libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgps.so.17()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libqt-mt.so.3()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) OK %check is not present; no test suite upstream. N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. OK gui application; desktop file installed properly Source0 is mistyped desktop-file-validate qtgpsc.desktop qtgpsc.desktop: warning: value Application;Utility; for key Categories in group Desktop Entry contains a deprecated value Application License should be BSD not MIT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org 2009-01-28 13:27:53 EDT --- Looks good; thank you! APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-01-28 13:38:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: qtgpsc Short Description: A client for the gpsd GPS server Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-28 19:09:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||co...@gnome.eu.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|co...@gnome.eu.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
