[Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-02-20 06:42:10 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1024 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0996 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-26 20:51:04 EDT --- dateshift-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dateshift'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0996 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-26 20:53:57 EDT --- dateshift-1.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dateshift'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:32:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-01-22 03:19:43 EDT --- Thanks Tom for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-01-22 03:21:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dateshift Short Description: A date/time test tool Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||tcall...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tcall...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-21 17:57:30 EDT --- Review === Good: - rpmlint checks return: dateshift.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libdsintercept.so.0.0.0 e...@glibc_2.2.5 dateshift-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation You should continue trying to get upstream to resolve this, but I won't block this package review on it. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (0bcc71038686a1afdd0713b01eb81e7652634fa6) - license text in %doc - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Bad: - License tag (GPLv2) is wrong. License tag should be GPLv2+. * Please fix the license tag before you commit to cvs, but this package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
