Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098
Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE
Summary|Review Request: Djblets - A |Review Request:
|collection of useful|python-djblets - A
|classes and functions for |collection of useful
|Django |classes and functions for
||Django
Flag|needinfo?(ramez.ha...@gmail |
|.com) |
--- Comment #25 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2009-12-21 13:09:49
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
I've done the initial import into the devel branch.
I can tag and build 0.5rc1 in all the branches, but I'd rather go ahead with
the update to upstream's latest, 0.5.5. I've tested a mock build; looks good
here. Any thoughts?
Sorry for not responding.
Looking in the package db, this is indeed in Fedora as python-djblets
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/python-djblets
Looks like this review should have been closed out at that point.
Renaming this bug to python-djblets and closing this review out as CLOSED
CURRENTRELEASE.
Re comment #23 and #24, looking at the above link I see that Dan took Stephen's
changes and committed them and built them about an hour ago, so we have the
latest version of python-djblets built into rawhide (thanks Dan!).
I think if there's a call to issue updates for earlier releases, file them as
separate bugs to avoid confusing this review further. I've checked and there
is a python-djblets is a component in bz.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
