[Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 --- Comment #6 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2009-07-26 20:18:46 EDT --- Sorry, http://benboeckel.net/packaging/mod_falcon/mod_falcon-0.9.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 11:47:39 EDT --- The SRPM URL above does not seem to exist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2009-04-18 16:32:21 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/mod_falcon/mod_falcon.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/mod_falcon/mod_falcon-0.9.4-2.srpm Fixed up the License field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-04-01 13:31:54 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal, assuming that this code is dual-licensed like the Falcon language interpreter is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-03-24 17:12:04 EDT --- You might check the fedora-legal-list archives; Falcon has been covered here. First hit on a google search for fedora-legal-list falcon, for example. You might also just look at how the base Falcon package handles this, which is to simply use GPLv2+. It is not permissible to simply make up identifiers like FPLLv1.1 that are not in the list of approved licenses/identifiers at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2009-03-24 18:00:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) You might check the fedora-legal-list archives; Falcon has been covered here. First hit on a google search for fedora-legal-list falcon, for example. You might also just look at how the base Falcon package handles this, which is to simply use GPLv2+. It is not permissible to simply make up identifiers like FPLLv1.1 that are not in the list of approved licenses/identifiers at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing. Ah, alright. I'll just set the License: as GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
