[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-05-20 12:48:17 EDT --- It finally built successfully on F11 and upwards thanks to Milos Jakubicek. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-27 01:33:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-04-24 07:29:24 EDT --- My guess here is, that if MPD can not be started by the current user, it crashes. I shall do the CVS request though and build it on rawhide. Upstream will release version 0.2 soon anyway, let's see if the bug will be fixed then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-04-24 07:30:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: guimup Short Description: A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD Owners: th0br0 Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: th0br0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-24 07:44:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) My guess here is, that if MPD can not be started by the current user, it crashes. guimupd should behave the same if compiled against libmpd-devel and the included libmpdclient.h, this means it should show the not connected message. (In reply to comment #13) InitialCC: th0br0 InitialCC is for people other than yourself. BTW: I suggest you apply for libmpd watchcommits in pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-24 21:24:13 EDT --- Please preserve the time stamp when installing the icon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-04-23 06:27:09 EDT --- Hello, I guess I fixed everything now. Regarding the Source0: The url supplied in the spec file is valid and working... only the link on the upstream homepage is bad. Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup-0.1.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942
--- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-23
06:37:03 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Hello, I guess I fixed everything now.
Thanks, I will look into this tonight.
The url supplied in the spec file is valid and working... only the link on the
upstream homepage is bad.
http://www.coonsden.com/dl0ads/%{srcname}-%{version}src.tar.gz resolves to
http://www.coonsden.com/dl0ads/Guimup-0.1.4src.tar.gz
$ wget http://www.coonsden.com/dl0ads/Guimup-0.1.4src.tar.gz
--2009-04-23 12:33:48-- http://www.coonsden.com/dl0ads/Guimup-0.1.4src.tar.gz
Auflösen des Hostnamen »www.coonsden.com« 83.137.194.17
Verbindungsaufbau zu www.coonsden.com|83.137.194.17|:80... verbunden.
HTTP Anforderung gesendet, warte auf Antwort... 403 Forbidden
2009-04-23 12:33:48 FEHLER 403: Forbidden.
$ wget http://www.coonsden.com/cgi-bin/ShotGun.cgi?ammo=Guimup-stable-src
--2009-04-23 12:35:49--
http://www.coonsden.com/cgi-bin/ShotGun.cgi?ammo=Guimup-stable-src
Auflösen des Hostnamen »www.coonsden.com« 83.137.194.17
Verbindungsaufbau zu www.coonsden.com|83.137.194.17|:80... verbunden.
HTTP Anforderung gesendet, warte auf Antwort... 200 OK
Länge: nicht spezifiziert [text/html]
»Last-modified«-Kopfzeile fehlt -- Zeitstempel abgeschaltet.
--2009-04-23 12:35:49--
http://www.coonsden.com/cgi-bin/ShotGun.cgi?ammo=Guimup-stable-src
Verbindungsaufbau zu www.coonsden.com|83.137.194.17|:80... verbunden.
HTTP Anforderung gesendet, warte auf Antwort... 200 OK
Länge: nicht spezifiziert [text/html]
In »ShotGun.cgi?ammo=Guimup-stable-src« speichern.
[ = ] 387 --.-K/s in 0s
2009-04-23 12:35:49 (21,9 MB/s) - »ShotGun.cgi?ammo=Guimup-stable-src«
gespeichert [387]
$ cat ShotGun.cgi\?ammo\=Guimup-stable-src
htmlheadtitleError/titlelink rel=stylesheet type=text/css
href=http://www.coonsden.com/scripts/template.css;/headbodyspan
class=titleTextError/spanblockquote
Please eitherbrbr1. Disable your download managerbr2. Left click the file
you are attempting to downloadbrbrorbrbr3. Enable your browser to send
HTTP Referrers.
/blockquote/body/html
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-04-23 06:51:24 EDT --- Hey, I'm sorry for that. As I only tried accessing the download URL via Firefox, I didn't notice that they are checking for the user agent... if you execute wget http://www.coonsden.com/dl0ads/Guimup-0.1.4src.tar.gz; -U Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032713 Fedora/3.0.8-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.8 It works fine. Anyway, I'll contact upstream on this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-23 07:02:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Hey, I'm sorry for that. No need to feel sorry. :) As I only tried accessing the download URL via Firefox Don't use firefox because of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps we need a downloadable URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-04-23 08:11:24 EDT --- I just talked to upstream, he gave me links to the source on SF. Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup-0.1.4-3.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Apr 23 2009 Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 0.1.4-3 - Updated Source0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942
--- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-23
11:16:24 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I just talked to upstream, he gave me links to the source on SF.
Argh, that was too simple ;)
REVIEW FOR 0b9b2bc803e2fac3eb5396cb225c4a5a guimup-0.1.4-3.fc10.src.rpm
OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines (GPLv3+).
OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license.
OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc.
OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English.
OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible.
OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by
MD5 eeccdd2ef671f191f2c9a7170df99244
OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on
i386
N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro.
N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package.
OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates (none except in
docdir).
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. The %files section includes a
%defattr(...) line.
OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot}.
OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content.
N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage.
OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application.
N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig'.
N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a
%{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with
desktop-file-install in the %install section.
OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by
other packages.
OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}.
OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items:
N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
FAIL - SHOULD: The the package does not build in mock due to an libtool error.
OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
FAIL - SHOULD: The package does not function as described, it initially
crashes.
N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase,
and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel
pkg.
N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin,
/sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the
file instead of the file itself.
Other items:
OK - Review is not a duplicate
OK - All relevant doc included
OK - Timestamps are preserved both during downlad and install
OK - Latest stable version packaged
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-23 11:18:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340952) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340952) build.log of a failed mockbuild -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-04-23 11:32:45 EDT --- Hey, there is no INSTALL in %doc, what are you referring to ?!? Fixed the desktop file. I can not reproduce the mock failure. The crash is caused by MPD not running. What is the best way of solving this? Talk to upstream? Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup-0.1.4-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-23 12:15:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Hey, there is no INSTALL in %doc, what are you referring to ?!? Sorry, I just saw the INSTALL during build, but it was the one that gets removed afterwards. My bad. I can not reproduce the mock failure. Against which release did you mock it? Mine was F11, which is treated as rawhide by the mirrorlist. The crash is caused by MPD not running. What is the best way of solving this? Talk to upstream? No idea, but I think we agree that it should not crash. The older package didn't crash if mpd wasn't running but starts it correctly: $ guimup MPD: using /etc/mpd.conf MPD: user is Config: using /home/chris/.guimup.conf Autoconnecting, as configured No host name: using localhost Invalid port #: using 6600 Error: connection closed Is MPD running? Starting MPD, as configured problem opening log file /var/lib/mpd/mpd.log (config line 28) for writing So there is something not working with the communication between guimup and mpd. I will look into the new package later. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-23 19:37:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) Created an attachment (id=340952) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340952) [details] build.log of a failed mockbuild While looking at the libtool issue closer I remembered that it was discussed recently on devel-list. See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-April/msg00965.html and follow-ups, especially the one from Mamoru. The new package aad87062659e66f7214a63cae5015934 guimup-0.1.4-4.fc10.src.rpm fixes all outstanding issues: OK - Trailing backslash was removed from INSTALL=install -p OK - Desktop file follows latest fdo specs From a packaging point of view there are no more blockers, so the package is APPROVED. Nevertheless I'd like to ask you to only build it for rawhide until the crash is fixed. Take your time, work it out with upstream and once it's fixed build packages for the stable releases. This also works around the current libtool problems mentioned above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942
--- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-22
20:25:52 EDT ---
Some initial comments:
Please don't use
%global srcname Guimup
for something that only appears twice in the spec and never changes.
Source0 gives a 403 error. This is most likely due to some weird configuration
of the server, that only allows downloading via
http://www.coonsden.com/cgi-bin/ShotGun.cgi?ammo=Guimup-stable-src
Please tell upstream to stop this nonsense if he wants his package in Fedora.
The install section is broken:
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} \
INSTALL=install -p \
DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
DESTDIR is used twice
rm -rf %{buildroot}/usr/doc
/usr should not be hardcoded, use %{_usr} instead.
The package is a gui app, but lacks a desktop file. You need to add one as
described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files
Macro usage is not consistent, you use both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}.
See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS
The license is not correct. The program is GPLv3+, but the copy of libmpdclient
is under a different license.
remove libmpdclient.{c,h} during %prep, add libmpd-devel as BuildRequires and
build against it, see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
This will also clear the license issue I mentioned.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||fed...@christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@christoph-wickert.de Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
