[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-09-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||0.5.5-1.fc10
 Resolution||ERRATA




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-09-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-09-06 16:39:23 EDT ---
python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-08-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA




--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-08-17 17:57:39 EDT ---
python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-sqlalchemy0.5'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8675

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-08-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-08-17 20:22:34 EDT ---
python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-sqlalchemy0.5'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0282

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-08-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #18 from Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com  2009-08-15 05:31:24 EDT 
---
Hmm, with that chmod usage I'm getting error.  I'm not sure if it's something
messed up with my environment.  The original version still works for me.

+ chmod -R a-X
/home/lmacken/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.3-4.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages
chmod: cannot access
`/home/lmacken/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.3-4.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlchemy-0.5.3-py2.6.egg':
Permission denied

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-08-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #19 from Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com  2009-08-15 05:34:40 EDT 
---
Also, the nosetest changes don't work with this package.  The old %check still
works.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-08-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #20 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com  2009-08-15 
11:58:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #18)
 Hmm, with that chmod usage I'm getting error.  I'm not sure if it's something
 messed up with my environment.  The original version still works for me.
 
I'm a dummy and reversed what X does in chmod but we resolved this on IRC
using find -type f

The nosetest changes worked when updated to sqlalchemy-0.5.5.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-08-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-08-15 13:38:30 EDT ---
python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-08-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-08-15 13:38:25 EDT ---
python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 5.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-08-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu  2009-08-14 12:16:58 
EDT ---
CVS done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-08-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #16 from Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com  2009-08-13 12:42:04 EDT 
---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: python-sqlalchemy0.5
Short Description: Modular and flexible ORM library for python
Owners: lmacken, toshio
Branches: F-10 EL-5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-08-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #13 from Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com  2009-08-12 09:54:53 EDT 
---
I did a little bit of testing after removing the easy-install.pth file, and
this package still seems to work (after running
pkg_resources.require(SQLAlchemy0.5), of course).

http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.3-2.fc10.src.rpm
http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5.spec

* Wed Aug 12 2009 Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com - 0.5.3-3
- Remove conflicting easy-install.pth file from our site-packages

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-08-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #14 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com  2009-08-12 
18:22:57 EDT ---
I think you mean this SRPM:
http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.3-3.fc11.src.rpm

Checking it now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-08-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #15 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com  2009-08-12 
18:44:52 EDT ---
easy_install.pth no longer conflicts.  Package builds in koji.

Two problems that you can fix when you import the package:

There's a new version sqlalchemy-0.5.5 that you might want to update to before
pushing this to EPEL for the first time.  0.5.5 contains a rarely used API
breaking change so getting it into the first release will make sure that no one
is depending on the old behaviour if you need to update later.

The egg info files are executable.  I believe this is a bug in
python-setuptools that I submitted a patch for and was fixed for Fedora but
it's still plaguing the RHEL5 version of setuptools.  You can probably change
your chmod line like this:

- find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib} -name '*.py' | xargs chmod -x
+ chmod -R a-X $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}

Since there shouldn't be any scripts under %{python_sitelib}.

Provided you make those two changes when you import, this package is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|panem...@gmail.com  |nob...@fedoraproject.org
   Flag|fedora-review?  |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|a.bad...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #12 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com  2009-07-15 
04:15:16 EDT ---
This looks good.  All of Parag AN's comments have been addressed.  I see a
problem that comes from the guidelines, though:

%{python_sitelib}/easy_install.pth will conflict when there's more than one
compat package installed on the system.  With F11's version of setuptools,
there doesn't seem to be a reason to touch easy_install.pth in the first place.
 If you're going to build this package for EL-5/EL-4 could you test build it
there with the touch %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/easy_install.pth removed and
see if we can just remove that?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-07-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu  2009-07-11 02:03:36 EDT 
---
Umm, you're supposed to give him a month to reply, then ping, then close after
a week.  You didn't even give Luke a full week before your first ping, and now
I see you've dropped the other tickets in the dependency chain back into the
review queue.  Is there some problem?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-07-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(panem...@gmail.co |
   |m)  |




--- Comment #9 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com  2009-07-11 02:22:05 
EDT ---

I think Luke is very busy with his security work. I almost ping him daily on
#fedora-devel and #fedora-python. But very few times I got reply like he will
be going to work. So I thought instead of pinging him again and again I better
move on and pick some other reviews. And if I am dropping first package in
chain then it will be good to drop others also. As first package itself will
take some more time to appear in rawhide repository.


I hope there is no policy that prevents reviewer from leaving review at any
point. If there is any please point me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-07-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu  2009-07-11 02:31:09 
EDT ---
Of course you're welcome to drop reviews at any time if you feel like you can't
stick with it and wait a while for a busy person to respond.  That just means
that I or one of the other few reviewers will have to take care of them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-07-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #11 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com  2009-07-11 02:47:09 
EDT ---
and hey! I have not closed this review. Just moved back to New queue. Don't
worry I will pick some more reviews to look queue count lower for you. I know
you are very much worried about New Package Count. And if you are really, I
will say first we should try to do something for Merge-reviews.

I also see we have not very good but good amount of reviewers nowadays. I also
know you got busy with fedora-cvs work that is not giving you much time on
reviews.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-07-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||507697




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-07-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||needinfo?(panem...@gmail.co
   ||m)




--- Comment #7 from Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com  2009-07-10 14:31:52 EDT 
---
The .py files are installed under
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlchemy-0.5.3-py2.6.egg because it needs to
work alongside python-sqlalchemy.  See our egg guidelines for more details: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs

The BuildRequires: python-sqlite2 is for the test suite.

http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.3-2.fc10.src.rpm
http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5.spec

* Fri Jul 10 2009 Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com - 0.5.3-2
- Remove the executable bit from *.py

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-07-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com  2009-07-05 23:56:20 
EDT ---
I will close this review within this week as submitter is non-responsive.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com  2009-07-01 02:20:09 
EDT ---
ping?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-06-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com  2009-06-25 06:05:37 
EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i586).
koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1432964
+ source files match upstream url
0a4f50b690ae946c3188614eeea6f1e5f02681d9  SQLAlchemy-0.5.3.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Not a GUI application

I don't get why all .py* files installed under
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlchemy-0.5.3-py2.6.egg ?

Why rpmlint is complaining script-without-shebang error with this package
whereas I don't see such rpmlint messages in rawhide package?

why following is added to SPEC ?
BuildRequires:  python-sqlite2

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-06-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695





--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com  2009-06-24 03:25:32 
EDT ---
aah! I got confused here
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3643

What is need of this package in F11 and below? I see
python-sqlalchemy-0.5.4-1.p2.fc11 as latest package in F-11

I think this package will not be needed then.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-06-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||a.bad...@gmail.com




--- Comment #3 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com  2009-06-24 
22:53:11 EDT ---
Correct.  This package is needed for EPEL4/5.  It could be used on F-10 as well
although I don't know if lmacken plans on branching it there.  Fedora Community
needs to have sqlalchemy-0.5.x in order to run so getting it running on an EL-5
box depends on having this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-06-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tos...@fedoraproject.org




--- Comment #1 from Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com  2009-06-23 15:45:28 EDT 
---
This package is for the 0.5 release of SQLAlchemy, packaged to work alongside
of python-sqlalchemy (0.4) on Fedora 11 and below.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python

2009-06-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695


Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||panem...@gmail.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review