[Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-07-14 01:59:02 EDT --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 12:13:38 EDT --- I cannot seem to make any text-mode browser download the rpms from that koji link so that I can look at them. They always fail due to certificate issues. Do you have a trick for doing that, or could you fix the certificate issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 --- Comment #3 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-07-11 12:32:41 EDT --- Can you try http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83198 (s/https/http/)? The downloads work for me from elinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-07-11 13:59:23 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: openssl-ibmca Short Description: A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 13:21:54 EDT --- Yes, that works. Can't believe I didn't think of it myself. rpmlint is silent and according to the build logs this builds fine. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 5a2ee2084cbf2355a4d081a89ea3cd7debd6224affab89239b2bae105bea6275 openssl-ibmca-1.0.0.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in koji. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: libibmca.so()(64bit) openssl-ibmca = 1.0.0-1.fc11 openssl-ibmca(s390-64) = 1.0.0-1.fc11 = libcrypto.so.8()(64bit) openssl = 0.9.8 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 14:30:53 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
