[Bug 178142] Review Request: Jakarta Commons CLI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jakarta Commons CLI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178142 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176653] Review Request: python-sqlite2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlite2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176653 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 02:33 EST --- fine. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194054] Review Request: monodoc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194054 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 03:36 EST --- It seems to me that this bug shouldn't block Bug #178904, and also that it could be better as a duplicate of Bug #178900, but that's not a big deal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 03:45 EST ---
Second review:
* rpmlint issue:
- Well, will you check rpmlint issue before updating
srpm and spec file, please?
This time mock build is okay (except for one problem),
however:
E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/include/mif.h
E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/xspice/evt/evtload.c
E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/xspice/cm/cmexport.c
E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/xspice/cm/cmmeters.c
E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/xspice/mif/mif_inp2.c
E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/include/enh.h
E: ngspice-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/xspice/cmpp/read_ifs.c
.. (continues) ...
... perhaps this is due to permission issue. Change permissions
of \*.{c,h,y,l} to 0644.
E: ngspice-debuginfo wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/src/debug/ng-spice-rework-17/src/xspice/cm/cmevt.c
Perhaps cmevt.c has Windows-like end-of-line encoding.
Try:
%{__sed} -i -e 's|\r||' file
to get rid of this error.
* BuildRequires:
- compat-gcc-32-gc77 is unnecessary.
This package does not use g77 when rebuilt. I could succeed in
rebuilding without this package.
Also, FC-6 devel doesn't have compat-gcc-32-g77 .
- xorg-x11-proto-devel is required by libX11-devel.
- libXmu-devel is required by libXaw-devel .
- libXt-devel is required by libXaw-devel.
- flex, bison, libtool
Check if these packages are really needed. For me, mock
build succeeds without these and the rebuilt packages seems
functionally okay for the test case in the comment #2.
* Exclusion of Static Libraries:
- Well, %{_libdir}/ng-spice-rework/libbsim4.a seems unnecessary.
So, remove this on %install stage by rm command and get rid of
the use of %exclude.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 170296] Review Request: qalculate-kde - qt gui frontends to qalculate
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qalculate-kde - qt gui frontends to qalculate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170296 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|169974 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165892] Review Request: xsupplicant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsupplicant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 04:55 EST --- Reopening bug to fix assignee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 166208] Review Request: tinyerp : Open Source ERP Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyerp : Open Source ERP Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166208 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 04:55 EST --- Reopening bug to fix assignee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 166966] Review Request: jam : Program construction tool, similar to make
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jam : Program construction tool, similar to make https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166966 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 04:55 EST --- Reopening bug to fix assignee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165485] Review Request: This is a port of WMApm 1.1 with ACPI support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: This is a port of WMApm 1.1 with ACPI support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165485 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 04:55 EST --- Reopening bug to fix assignee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165892] Review Request: xsupplicant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsupplicant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 05:01 EST --- Assignee fixed, closing again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165485] Review Request: This is a port of WMApm 1.1 with ACPI support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: This is a port of WMApm 1.1 with ACPI support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165485 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 05:01 EST --- Assignee fixed, closing again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 166208] Review Request: tinyerp : Open Source ERP Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyerp : Open Source ERP Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166208 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 05:01 EST --- Assignee fixed, closing again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201149] Review Request: Cherokee Flexible WebServer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cherokee Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201149] Review Request: Cherokee Flexible WebServer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cherokee Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204162] Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204162 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 05:21 EST --- Actually this package allready exists in fedora extras cvs. But in the spec there is Build disabled. Package is without maintainer and has never been built before. The cvs log explains that this is a fire and forget package that was never built, and the devel branch has been disabled. I did a resurection request at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded This let you time to assign yourself to that bug ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204163] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 05:26 EST --- New srpm available - added BuildRequires for tests http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.06-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 183694] Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183694 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 180164] Review Request: muine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180164 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug 180164 depends on bug 183694, which changed state. Bug 183694 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183694 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181824] Review Request: gstreamer08
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer08 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181824 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 183694] Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183694 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 180164] Review Request: muine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180164 Bug 180164 depends on bug 183694, which changed state. Bug 183694 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183694 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 166758] Review Request: qps - visual process status monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qps - visual process status monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166758 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 166409] Review Request: gajim - jabber client written in PyGTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gajim - jabber client written in PyGTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166409 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 166588] Review Request: openvpn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166588 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204461] New: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/kita.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/kita-0.177.3-3.src.rpm Description: Kita is a 2ch client for KDE. Note: Details of 2ch are on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2channel From en wikipedia: 2channel is thought to be the largest Internet forum in the world. With over 10 million visitors every day (as of 2001), it is gaining significant influence in Japanese society, approaching that of traditional mass media such as television, radio, and magazines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 06:59 EST --- Created an attachment (id=135118) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135118action=view) Mock build log of kita-0.177.3-3 This package can be rebuilt in mock cleanly. rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196635] Review Request: knetworkmanager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knetworkmanager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196635 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196635] Review Request: knetworkmanager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knetworkmanager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196635 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 08:04 EST --- Wojciech Kazubski who was working on geda for FE previously already wrote a patch for this, see: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1479983group_id=161080atid=818428 (unfortunatly the lines got wrapped, so it won't apply unless you fix this) Here is a better version without the lines wrapped: http://archives.seul.org/geda/dev/Apr-2006/msg00076.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 08:17 EST --- Did the packager get sponsored ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 08:37 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=135122)
-- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135122action=view)
file lists of geda-symbols
First review.
1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines :
* Timestamps
- Well, it seems this package has many text files. So
preserving timestamps is very desirable.
Try to change make install option so that (perhaps)
most files can keep timestamps. In xscreensaver case (I maintain
xscreensaver), I use
make INSTALL=install -p install
Check if this package accepts such options, or, if not,
change Makefile so that install command is used with -p option.
* File and Directory Ownership
- %{_datadir}/gEDA/scheme
%{gedadocdir}/man
I don't know why these empty directories needs to be
included in this package.
Usually if other packages install
some files in these directories, it is the package
which should own these directories, not this package. However,
* if you aim to sumbit other packages and
* the packages install some files in that directories and
* the packages surely requires this package,
these directories can be owned by this package.
Let me know your opinion about these directories.
2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines :
okay.
3. Other things I have noticed :
- Consider if /usr/share/gEDA/docs can be moved
to usual document files' location, i.e.
/usr/share/doc/geda-symbols-%{version}
- I will attach the file entry of geda-symbols rebuilt in
mock. Please check if all files you want to install in
this package are correctly packaged.
-
BTW, could you review my package (bug 204461) ? Again, this package
is aimed for Japanese users..
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #135122|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 183097] Review Request: rogue - text-based adventure game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rogue - text-based adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183097 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 183097] Review Request: rogue - text-based adventure game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rogue - text-based adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183097 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 09:06 EST --- Assigning to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181013] Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181013 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181013] Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgit - a GUI browser for local git repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181013 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Keywords|Reopened| Resolution||NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 09:09 EST --- Assigning to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 09:24 EST --- I've included 2 patches: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/libgeda-20060123-4.src.rpm As you can see it has been patched correctly + echo 'Patch #0 (libgeda-20060123-arc.patch):' Patch #0 (libgeda-20060123-arc.patch): + patch -p0 -b --suffix o_arc_basic.c -s + echo 'Patch #1 (libgeda-20060123-configure.patch):' Patch #1 (libgeda-20060123-configure.patch): + patch -p0 -b --suffix configure.ac -s + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.81346 + umask 022 but sounds like not: GLIB library version: 2.11.1 GTK+ library version: 2.9.1 GUILE library version:1.6.7 libgdgeda (png output): no mingw build: no data directory: /usr/share/gEDA rc directory: /usr/share/gEDA LIBGEDA .so version: 25:0:0 dmalloc debugging:no ElectricFence debugging: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202398] Review Request: python-musicbrainz2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-musicbrainz2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202398 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 09:41 EST --- Thanks for the review... sorry for the late acknowledgement. Imported into CVS and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 09:46 EST --- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/quodlibet-0.23.1-1.fc6.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/quodlibet-0.23.1-1.fc6.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Aug 28 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.23.1-1 - Update to 0.23.1 * Thu Aug 24 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.23-5 - Include a README.fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 09:56 EST --- To my knowledge I have not yet been sponsored. If there's something I need to do for this please point me in the right direction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:03 EST --- Created an attachment (id=135132) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135132action=view) No-mock build log of libgeda (changed) Well, do you mean that you want the following result of configure (as attached in this comment)? config.status: creating docs/Makefile config.status: creating libgeda.pc config.status: creating scripts/geda_totexi config.status: creating scripts/notangle_guile config.status: creating config.h config.status: executing depfiles commands config.status: executing geda_totexi-chmod commands config.status: executing notangle_guile-chmod commands ** Configuration summary for libgeda 20060123: GLIB library version: 2.12.2 GTK+ library version: 2.10.2 GUILE library version:1.8.0 gdlib (png output): yes 2.0.33 mingw build: no data directory: /usr/share/gEDA rc directory: /usr/share/gEDA LIBGEDA .so version: 25:0:0 dmalloc debugging:no ElectricFence debugging: no + make -j3 make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/libgeda-20060123' Making all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/libgeda-20060123/src' make all-am make[3]: Entering directory `/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/libgeda-20060123/src' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:08 EST --- Created an attachment (id=135133) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135133action=view) spec file used on the above comment. spec file I used for the comment #7 . No patch is applied. Note: I have not checked yet by mock. However, if this result is suitable for you, again please upload spec and srpm file and I will check it. Note: your patch includes the parameter change of a function. I cannot apply this because I don't know what this means. If the parameter change you included in your patch is necessary, please do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:18 EST ---
Another comment:
Check the BR for this package and Requirement for -devel package.
For me, normal rpmbuild (i.e. rebuild without mock) WITH GDLIB ENABLED
add the Requirement of
libX11.so.6
libXpm.so.4
libfontconfig.so.1
ibfreetype.so.6
libjpeg.so.62
libpng12.so.0
libz.so.1
So, maybe libX11-devel, libXpm-devel, .. are missing for BR.
And this changes /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libgeda.pc . With mock build. it says
Libs: -L${libdir} -lgeda -pthread -lguile-L/lib -lglib-2.0 -L/lib
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -L/lib
-lgdk-x11-2.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo
-lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0
But with normal build (and WITH GDLIB ENABLED)
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libgeda.pc says
Libs: -L${libdir} -lgeda -pthread -lguile -L/usr/lib -lXpm -lX11 -ljpeg
-lfontconfig -lfreetype -lpng12 -lz -lm -L/lib -lglib-2.0 -L/lib
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -L/lib
-lgdk-x11-2.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo
-lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:32 EST ---
shouldn't this directory be owned as well :
%{_datadir}/apps/kita/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 Bug 185951 depends on bug 186327, which changed state. Bug 186327 Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:42 EST ---
No need for
Requires(post,postun): %{_bindir}/update-desktop-database
Requires(post,postun): %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache
Per the ScriptletSnippets wiki, no need to add dependancies for these.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:43 EST --- Reassigning to me as part of some bugzilla cleanup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 Bug 185951 depends on bug 186327, which changed state. Bug 186327 Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195692] Review Request: guichan - Portable C++ GUI library for games using Allegro, SDL and OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guichan - Portable C++ GUI library for games using Allegro, SDL and OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195692 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:45 EST --- Reassigning to me as part of some bugzilla cleanup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:50 EST ---
To the comment #2 :
You mean that this package SHOULD NOT own the directory?
If you mean that this package SHOULD, it is already because
%{_datadir}/apps/kita/ equals to
%dir %{_datadir}/apps/kita/
%{_datadir}/apps/kita/*
This directory is used only by this package, so owning this package is
necessary.
To comment #3 :
Why? %post and %postun uses these commands.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:51 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Try to change make install option so that (perhaps)
most files can keep timestamps. In xscreensaver case (I maintain
xscreensaver), I use
make INSTALL=install -p install
Check if this package accepts such options, or, if not,
It accepts -p ::)
make INSTALL=install -p install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
* File and Directory Ownership
- %{_datadir}/gEDA/scheme
%{gedadocdir}/man
I don't know why these empty directories needs to be
included in this package.
3. Other things I have noticed :
- Consider if /usr/share/gEDA/docs can be moved
to usual document files' location, i.e.
/usr/share/doc/geda-symbols-%{version}
Actually geda-gsymbols are required by geda-gschem geda-gsymcheck geda-doc
geda-gattrib geda-gnetlist geda-utils.
And all these are required by geda which is a suite. (though i haven't YET
included them as Requires in the geda package)
Hence these act as a centralised repository for geda.
- I will attach the file entry of geda-symbols rebuilt in
mock. Please check if all files you want to install in
this package are correctly packaged.
Yes, everything is included :) luckily
Updated:
SPEC: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-symbols.spec
SRPM: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-symbols-20060123-4.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204151] Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204151 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:51 EST --- So requested :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204163] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks - HTML to text conversion with links as footnotes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:53 EST --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:56 EST --- Why? %post and %postun uses these commands. They need not necessarily be present at install-time, hence the presence of ||: at the end of each command. For more details, please read the ScriptletSnippets wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 11:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) Actually geda-gsymbols are required by geda-gschem geda-gsymcheck geda-doc geda-gattrib geda-gnetlist geda-utils. And all these are required by geda which is a suite. (though i haven't YET included them as Requires in the geda package) Hence these act as a centralised repository for geda. Okay. Now this package is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 11:20 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) Why? %post and %postun uses these commands. They need not necessarily be present at install-time, hence the presence of ||: at the end of each command. For more details, please read the ScriptletSnippets wiki. Okay. I removed those. spec, srpm are updated: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/kita.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/kita-0.177.3-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204493] New: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mozilla-DOM/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Mozilla-DOM-0.20-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Mozilla-DOM.spec Description: This module wraps the Mozilla DOM interface in Perl. In conjuction with an embedded Gecko widget (e.g. Gtk2::MozEmbed), you can use Perl to manipulate the browser DOM, handle DOM signals, and create events such as mouse clicks -- all within a Mozilla-like browser (so it also does JavaScript). See `perldoc Mozilla::DOM` for more details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||163776 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204494] New: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Embedded mozilla with perl!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204494 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Embedded mozilla with perl! Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gtk2-MozEmbed/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.06-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.spec Description: This module allows you to use the Mozilla embedding widget from Perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204494] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Embedded mozilla with perl!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Embedded mozilla with perl! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204494 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||204493 OtherBugsDependingO||163776 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||204494 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188440] Review Request: dispatcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dispatcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188440 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 11:26 EST --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204495] New: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/GStreamer/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-GStreamer-0.09-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-GStreamer.spec Description: GStreamer makes everybody dance like crazy. It provides the means to play, stream, and convert nearly any type of media -- be it audio or video. GStreamer wraps the GStreamer library in a nice and Perlish way, freeing the programmer from any memory management and object casting hassles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||163776 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204497] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of audio files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204497 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||204494, 204495 OtherBugsDependingO||163776 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204494] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Embedded mozilla with perl!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Embedded mozilla with perl! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204494 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||204497 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||204497 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204152] Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 11:33 EST --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/orca/orca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/orca/orca-0.9.0-2.src.rpm I changed the Groups tag but I belive there should be an accessability group as it is an important segment that we must support. Having the group makes our support that much more visible -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 11:34 EST ---
All of this:
if [ -d %{_prefix}/lib64 ] ; then
SUF=64
else
SUF=
fi
for f in %{_prefix}/lib$SUF/qt-* ; do
QTDIR=$f
done
...
--with-qt-libraries=...
Can be omitted, and put this in before calling %configure:
unset QTDIR || : ; . /etc/profile.d/qt.sh
which will setup the QT env. vars automatically/appropriately.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 11:38 EST --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored Normally the reviewer who approved the package is responsible for sponsoring you. Is Adrian Reber awol ? Adrian ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204162] Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204162 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 11:45 EST --- Details, details... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 11:56 EST --- Another update. The recent FC5 selinux-policy package update has split out a separate selinux-policy-devel package, as per FC6. So the buildreqs are now the same for FC5 and FC6 onwards. Packages (1.10-6) available in usual place: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204502] New: Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204502 Summary: Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pknirsch/FC/xosd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pknirsch/FC/xosd-2.2.14-8.fc6.src.rpm Description: XOSD displays text on your screen, sounds simple right? The difference is it is unmanaged and shaped, so it appears transparent. This gives the effect of an On Screen Display, like your TV/VCR etc.. The package also includes an xmms plugin, which automatically displays various interesting things as they change (song name, volume etc...) We have it working here on several laptops and it's really nice to have. Read ya, Phil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204502] Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204502 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Core |Red Hat Enterprise Linux ||Beta Version|devel |5.0.0 Component|Package Review |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204502] Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204502 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204152] Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 12:13 EST --- Yes block away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 12:19 EST --- One remark (not a blocker), test.patch could be named with the package name prepended. * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, licence included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream 4f6f27edded250b00055d076eb738ff5 GStreamer-0.09.tar.gz * sane provides (with the known insane GStreamer.so) Provides: GStreamer.so perl(GStreamer) perl(GStreamer::Caps) perl(GStreamer::Install::Files) * %files section right I tried to test using player.pl in examples, but it doesn't seems to work. Or maybe I am missing something: $ perl /usr/share/doc/perl-GStreamer-0.09/examples/player.pl /usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg Playing: /usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg Resource not found. at /usr/share/doc/perl-GStreamer-0.09/examples/player.pl line 21. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 12:54 EST --- however with this spec file: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/libgeda.spec It fails checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for gdlib_CFLAGS... checking for gdlib_LIBS... configure: error: Package requirements (gdlib = 2.0.15) were not met. Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively you may set the gdlib_CFLAGS and gdlib_LIBS environment variables to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.66151 (%build) RPM build errors: compared to yours, checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for gdlib_CFLAGS... checking for gdlib_LIBS... -lXpm -lX11 -ljpeg -lfontconfig -lfreetype -lpng12 -lz -lm checking for X... libraries , headers checking for gethostbyname... yes checking for connect... yes even though I don't feel it requires libgd.so.2 in yours too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204461] Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kita - 2ch client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 13:31 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) Can be omitted, and put this in before calling %configure: unset QTDIR || : ; . /etc/profile.d/qt.sh which will setup the QT env. vars automatically/appropriately. Well, configure seems to accept QTLIB. Again updated so as to call qt.sh : http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/kita.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/kita-0.177.3-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||196802 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 13:42 EST --- While I don't have time at the instant moment to check to see if 16MB is enough to install this package with, I'm going to mark this bug as depending on bug 196802. (Definitely something we should validate however -- would solve a lot of the bad feelings I get contemplating overriding a core php.ini value.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 13:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) however with this spec file: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/libgeda.spec It fails checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for gdlib_CFLAGS... checking for gdlib_LIBS... configure: error: Package requirements (gdlib = 2.0.15) were not met. Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively you may set the gdlib_CFLAGS and gdlib_LIBS environment variables to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.66151 (%build) RPM build errors: compared to yours, checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for gdlib_CFLAGS... checking for gdlib_LIBS... -lXpm -lX11 -ljpeg -lfontconfig -lfreetype -lpng12 -lz -lm checking for X... libraries , headers checking for gethostbyname... yes checking for connect... yes even though I don't feel it requires libgd.so.2 in yours too So it means that this package don't have to libgd.so.2 , but have to use libXpm.so.?, libX11.so.?, etc. Also, lXpm -lX11 -ljpeg -lfontconfig -lfreetype -lpng12 -lz -lm is returned by gdlib-config --libs. gdlib-config is included in gd-devel, so you cannot compile without gd-devel when my change applied. You seems to have commented out the requirement of gd-devel. If so this package cannot be built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204513] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204513 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.columbia.edu/~amlai/xcalc/xorg-x11-xcalc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.columbia.edu/~amlai/xcalc/xorg-x11-xcalc-1.0.1-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: A simple x11 calculator The program xcalc disappeared in FC5. A number of individuals have been looking for it. The source is from X11R7.0. rpmlint reports W: xorg-x11-xcalc invalid-license MIT/X11 However, this is consistent with the rest of the xorg packages in Core. This is my first package and I will need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204513] Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204513 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 14:14 EST --- Yeah, let's block on that. I've added the hacks to create a temporary local php.ini in %post and %postun, but that's a horrible hack. I'd rather wait until PHP moves out of 1996, when 8M was considered a lot for a process. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203190] Review Request: netlabel_tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 14:16 EST --- All the changes to the packaging that you requested have been done (same spec file URL). The .src.rpm now passes rpmlint on a rawhide system[1]: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/netlabel_tools/netlabel_tools.spec http://people.redhat.com/jantill/netlabel_tools/netlabel_tools-0.16-4.src.rpm [1] Actually it warns the specfile is 600, but it's correct in the tar archive (before I create the .src.rpm) so I don't see how to fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203190] Review Request: netlabel_tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 14:23 EST --- Nevermind, I fixed the specfile thing too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 14:27 EST --- Since this isn't blocked by the ImageMagick/libpng screwiness anymore is there an eta on approval. I'd love to see Tango goodness on my desktop without hand compiling it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 14:34 EST --- The main holdup is that Piotr FE_NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 15:01 EST --- Ok, that's weird. Works for me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ perl /usr/share/doc/perl-GStreamer-0.09/examples/player.pl /usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg Playing: /usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg Artist: Aleksi AUBRY-CARLSON Title: Album: Track number: 0 My system is a (mostly grin) stock fc5/x86_64 system, with all updates. Is yours a devel/fc6tX box? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204525] New: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm Description: The Graphical Editing Framework (GEF) allows developers to take an existing application model and quickly create a rich graphical editor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 15:19 EST --- Yep it is devel, i386. The requires seem right: $ rpm -q --requires perl-GStreamer libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libdl.so.2 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgstreamer-0.10.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libxml2.so.2 libz.so.1 perl = 0:5.008 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(Glib) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) I have gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.9-4 gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.4-1.fc6 gstreamer-devel-0.10.9-2 gstreamer-tools-0.10.9-2 gstreamer-0.10.9-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 15:20 EST --- Warren, I hope you don't mind, but I updated to the latest version and made some other changes: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/sqlgrey/sqlgrey.spec http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/sqlgrey-1.7.4-1.src.rpm AFAIK, the only major issue left is that the init script is extremely broken. I'm going to try to work on that right now. Oh, and I'm inclined to completely drop the upstream changelog. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 15:26 EST --- Thanks Steven, I haven't been able to prioritize working on this. Would you like to take over ownership? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 15:31 EST --- Ok, a strace shows that it tries to open localhost/usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg Changing the scipt a bit such that it doesn't call Glib::filename_to_uri and constructing the uri myself, it works APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 15:49 EST --- In fact gstreamer doesn't resolve an uri like file://localhost/usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg to /usr/share/wesnoth/music/elf-land.ogg Not sure that it is a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 15:57 EST --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ngspice.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ngspice-17-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
