Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:16:49PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: Tom Callaway (aka, no one asked for it explicitly) * perl-Alien-wxWidgets -- Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries * perl-AppConfig -- Perl module for reading configuration files * perl-Array-Compare -- Perl extension for comparing arrays * perl-Cairo -- Perl interface to the cairo library * perl-Carp-Assert -- Executable comments * perl-Carp-Assert-More -- Convenience wrappers around Carp::Assert * perl-Config-IniFiles -- A module for reading .ini-style configuration files * perl-Data-Compare -- Compare perl data structures * perl-DBD-XBase -- Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files Ummm -- I've asked for perl-DBD-XBase ... -- Jan Pazdziora Satellite Engineering, Red Hat -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 03:58 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Seems to me, as if Fedora doesn't support collective maintainership :// Its a technicality. There is no difference in rights or permissions between primary maintainers and comaintainers, except that the packagedb requires there be a primary. ~spot -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:40:15AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 03:58 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Seems to me, as if Fedora doesn't support collective maintainership :// Its a technicality. There is no difference in rights or permissions between primary maintainers and comaintainers, except that the packagedb requires there be a primary. I think that Ralf point is not about having many comaintainers, but group comaintainers. Looks like the packagedb doesn't allow that. -- Pat -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:05 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:40:15AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 03:58 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Seems to me, as if Fedora doesn't support collective maintainership :// Its a technicality. There is no difference in rights or permissions between primary maintainers and comaintainers, except that the packagedb requires there be a primary. I think that Ralf point is not about having many comaintainers, but group comaintainers. Looks like the packagedb doesn't allow that. Almost. What I wanted to find is how Fedora supports and destinguishes: a) a principal w/ several co-maintainers under his directions b) free for a specific group with changing members e.g. free for perl-sig, free for FPG, free for sponsors. c) free for anybody (free for any Fedora all CLA-signors) d) orphaned My understanding of what Spot wrote is: Fedora doesn't support b) and c). He can't avoid folding them into a). IMO, this lets appear collective maintainership as a closed group/intriguing circle, because doesn't let appear such packages as open for interested volunteers, but implies explicit appointment and explict knowledge about how somebody made it into such a circle. Or differently: one year ahead, nobody will remember these packages are open, because they can't be distinguished from the usual closed circles maintaining packages otherwise. Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:26:38PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: What I wanted to find is how Fedora supports and destinguishes: a) a principal w/ several co-maintainers under his directions b) free for a specific group with changing members e.g. free for perl-sig, free for FPG, free for sponsors. c) free for anybody (free for any Fedora all CLA-signors) d) orphaned My understanding of what Spot wrote is: Fedora doesn't support b) and c). He can't avoid folding them into a). c) is technicaly possible, it corresponds with 'group members can commit?' selected. However, in general, having this selected doesn't mean that the maintainer is really willing to let everybody touch the package. Or differently: one year ahead, nobody will remember these packages are open, because they can't be distinguished from the usual closed circles maintaining packages otherwise. Right. Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? and select 'group members can commit?'. -- Pat -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? and select 'group members can commit?'. IMO, the easiest approach would be to use perl-sig or similar (eg. an email alias or a packagedb alias (should such thing exist)) as owner ;) Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:25 -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? and select 'group members can commit?'. IMO, the easiest approach would be to use perl-sig or similar (eg. an email alias or a packagedb alias (should such thing exist)) as owner ;) Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently. You should talk to Toshio about this. Me? I don't have a problem when the packagedb stuff denotes you to maintain all these packages all alone, because nobody can distinguish them from true Spot packages nor when these packages doen't receive cpancheck from because of this. This is solely your problem - Sooner or later. Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 15:41 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:25 -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? and select 'group members can commit?'. IMO, the easiest approach would be to use perl-sig or similar (eg. an email alias or a packagedb alias (should such thing exist)) as owner ;) Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently. You should talk to Toshio about this. Me? I don't have a problem when the packagedb stuff denotes you to maintain all these packages all alone, because nobody can distinguish them from true Spot packages nor when these packages doen't receive cpancheck from because of this. This is solely your problem - Sooner or later. I don't have any problem with this. They'll show up in cpancheck as packages that I need to fix. You're the one who is getting worked up over technical limitations. ~spot -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:46:32AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: I don't have any problem with this. They'll show up in cpancheck as packages that I need to fix. You're the one who is getting worked up over technical limitations. And where would one find this cpancheck that knows how to check the packagedb? :-) Steve -- Steven Pritchard - KS Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)624-4440 Mobile: (618)567-7320 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:22 -0600, Steven Pritchard wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:46:32AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: I don't have any problem with this. They'll show up in cpancheck as packages that I need to fix. You're the one who is getting worked up over technical limitations. And where would one find this cpancheck that knows how to check the packagedb? :-) Yet another individual facing this regression? Am using a script to restore a local owners.list from the packagedb and than run a slight modified derivative of a very early version of your script. snip #!/bin/sh owners=$(HOME)/src/fedora/local lftp -c get https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugzilla?tg_format=plain; \ -o $owners/owners.list.raw cat $owners/owners.list.raw | grep '^Fedora|' $owners/owners.fedora.list snip As my local cpancheck only checks for packages being maintained by me, ... it will not check spots packages. So be it - He receives what he wants. Collective maintainership has failed due to infrastructural defects - period. Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Nov 28, 2007 6:25 AM, Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? and select 'group members can commit?'. IMO, the easiest approach would be to use perl-sig or similar (eg. an email alias or a packagedb alias (should such thing exist)) as owner ;) Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently. You should talk to Toshio about this. I'm unfamiliar with the limitations of the accounts/grouping/packagedb system, but if we can have the accounts system enforce a requirement that members of one group must be a subset of another group (e.g. perl-sig group members must be members of the cla-done group), would this satisfy the requirement that all package owners have signed CLA's? Can we have a group own a package? I'm buying what Ralf is saying here: to attempt to have collective ownership via individual ownership and extensive co-maintainers is another variant of dirty hacks. Of course, I may be totally misunderstanding how the systems work together here :) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 08:09 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: I'm buying what Ralf is saying here: to attempt to have collective ownership via individual ownership and extensive co-maintainers is another variant of dirty hacks. Of course, I may be totally misunderstanding how the systems work together here :) The perl-SIG is not a user, hence it cannot own packages. Reference: Note: You may be asked to CC fedora-perl-devel-list on a perl package. This can be done with the username perl-sig. This is presently a user, not a group so it cannot be used as an owner or comaintainer, only for CC. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSPrivate Any more than that, I do not know, and you should be talking to Toshio about making possible improvements. Please do not shoot the messenger. :) ~spot -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 401941] EPEL Branch Request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: EPEL Branch Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401941 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 12:14 EST --- Branched and built successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:22 -0600, Steven Pritchard wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:46:32AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: I don't have any problem with this. They'll show up in cpancheck as packages that I need to fix. You're the one who is getting worked up over technical limitations. And where would one find this cpancheck that knows how to check the packagedb? :-) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsefulScripts That cpancheck seems fully capable of checking the packagedb. ~spot -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Fwd: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
Looks like this didn't make it :) -- Forwarded message -- From: Toshio Kuratomi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Nov 28, 2007 9:21 AM Subject: Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel? To: Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Chris, if this bounces from the list, feel free to forward it there. Chris Weyl wrote: On Nov 28, 2007 6:25 AM, Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? and select 'group members can commit?'. IMO, the easiest approach would be to use perl-sig or similar (eg. an email alias or a packagedb alias (should such thing exist)) as owner ;) Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently. You should talk to Toshio about this. I'm unfamiliar with the limitations of the accounts/grouping/packagedb system, but if we can have the accounts system enforce a requirement that members of one group must be a subset of another group (e.g. perl-sig group members must be members of the cla-done group), would this satisfy the requirement that all package owners have signed CLA's? Yes, this part is currently possible. We're changing over to an LDAP backend and better web frontend in a few months, though, so I don't know the limitations and abilities of that system. One other thing is that people would need to be a member of cvsextras as well as cla_done in order to login to the cvs server. Can we have a group own a package? Not currently. Pseudo groups like the current perl-sig can own a package but a real group cannot. This requires a bit of recoding in order to change. OTOH, letting a group be comaintainer (equivalent rights to owner) of a package is fairly complete (there are a few places where we are currently checking for cvsextras explicitly, but we can change those to list other groups without much difficulty. The biggest area where group ownership won't work precisely right at this time is in the webUI. cvsextras is our only current group and we aren't showing all the acls for it, just the commit acl. For the perl-sig, I imagine that you'll want to have at least commit, watchbugzilla, and watchcommits set. I can code this into the commandline tool admins are using to set permissions but doing the same for the webUI will require some rethinking of what it should look like and how complex it should be. I'm buying what Ralf is saying here: to attempt to have collective ownership via individual ownership and extensive co-maintainers is another variant of dirty hacks. Agreed. If you want to move forward with getting this working in the packagedb you should open a ticket[1]_, we can try and record all the changes we need in the packagedb and account system to enable the change. Then I can talk to the FAS2 author to be sure it won't cause him any grief when we migrate and we can code something up. We're shooting to deploy FAS2 in February. So if there are interdependencies between FAS and pkgdb that should wait on that deployment we would do so after that. .. _[1]: https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/packagedb/newticket -Toshio -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:05:45PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsefulScripts That cpancheck seems fully capable of checking the packagedb. I'll be damned. So it does. Isn't collaborative development great? ;-) Steve -- Steven Pritchard - KS Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)624-4440 Mobile: (618)567-7320 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 17:10 EST --- So someone has already built this, and we can close the ticket, correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 18:03 EST --- I see perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5 in the epel-5 testing repo, built on Nov 17th. I don't see any build yet for epel-4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 392341] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392341 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 20:32 EST --- perl-Algorithm-Dependency-1.104-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 20:40 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) I see perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5 in the epel-5 testing repo, built on Nov 17th. I don't see any build yet for epel-4. Weird. I don't know what I thought I saw. I've updated the spec to match the devel branch and fired off EL-4 and EL-5 builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 392331] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392331 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 20:44 EST --- perl-Class-Autouse-1.29-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 389741] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389741 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 20:35 EST --- perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.02-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 392301] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392301 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.31-2 Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 23:10 EST --- updates pushed for FC-7, FC-8 and rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 398451] missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: missing perl-Test-MinimumVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398451 Bug 398451 depends on bug 392291, which changed state. Bug 392291 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-MinimumVersion - Check whether your code requires a newer perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392291 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 237197] perl-File-Slurp: EL-4, EL-5 branches?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-File-Slurp: EL-4, EL-5 branches? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237197 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||edu) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 23:43 EST --- Ping? Chris, please feel free to take over for EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 230689] Missing config.h
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing config.h https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230689 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-28 23:39 EST --- Seems as if this bug did resolve automagically ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
