Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Bump minimum required version of Android to 5.0
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 2:17 PM Zhao Zhili wrote: > > We don’t have a minimum required version of Android in FFmpeg. > libavdevice/android_camera requires Android 7, Java MediaCodec > requires Android 4.1, and NDK MediaCodec requires Android 5.0. > > Without an explicit version, it’s unclear for development and test. > > Android 5.0 is released in 2014, is it OK to bump the minimum required > version to Android 5.0, or any other version you prefer? I'm OK with bumping the requirements to 5.0, especially if that helps with maintenance (I dont have nor work with devices < 8.1). ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Bump minimum required version of Android to 5.0
fre 2024-04-12 klockan 19:23 +0800 skrev Zhao Zhili: > > > > On Apr 12, 2024, at 18:50, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > > > tor 2024-04-11 klockan 21:57 +0800 skrev Zhao Zhili: > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 2024, at 21:17, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > > > > > > > tor 2024-04-11 klockan 20:16 +0800 skrev Zhao Zhili: > > > > > We don’t have a minimum required version of Android in > > > > > FFmpeg. > > > > > libavdevice/android_camera requires Android 7, Java > > > > > MediaCodec > > > > > requires Android 4.1, and NDK MediaCodec requires Android > > > > > 5.0. > > > > > > > > > > Without an explicit version, it’s unclear for development and > > > > > test. > > > > > > > > > > Android 5.0 is released in 2014, is it OK to bump the minimum > > > > > required > > > > > version to Android 5.0, or any other version you prefer? > > > > > > > > Don't we already have stuff that detects the Android version > > > > and > > > > acts > > > > accordingly? Dropping 4.1 might lessen the maintenance burden > > > > though. > > > > > > Check Android API level is easy. There is [no] minimum API level > > > requirement > > > in configure script as far as I know. > > > > Would be a good idea to add one > > > > What would dropping 4.1 support actually look like? I presume it > > would > > make the code a lot simpler. > > I can remove a lot of dlsym by link directly. And it will be more > clear to > know how to handle Android version dependent API when adding new > code. > > > > > > > I have an old phone (Samsung Galaxy S5) running the most recent > > > > LineageOS possible to install on it (16.0), and that uses > > > > Android > > > > 9. So > > > > for me bumping to version 5 sounds fine. > > > > > > > > Do you have any statistics on Android versions actually in use? > > > > > > Search by "Android distribution chart" shows version >= 5.0 is > > > about > > > 99.3%. > > > > Makes me wonder what kind of devices people run that haven't been > > updated in 10+ years.. > > Like TV and OTT box. I know those devices exist, but I highly doubt > that > anyone would attempt to run FFmpeg 7.1 on it. Yeah this is what I'm getting at. Sure people may be running old devices, but are they running programs on them that have been compiled recently? That's going to be a fraction of that remaining 0.7%, assuming there are devs updating apps that use FFmpeg for such old devices. > Android toolchains also drop support of Android 4.4 now. > > "KitKat (APIs 19 and 20) is no longer supported.” > > https://developer.android.com/ndk/downloads/revision_history So at some point it won't even be possible to compile against 4.1 without digging into the archives? That's preservationist work. I'm sure they can dig into our git history as well if they're so desperate to compile old things. /Tomas ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Bump minimum required version of Android to 5.0
> On Apr 12, 2024, at 18:50, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > tor 2024-04-11 klockan 21:57 +0800 skrev Zhao Zhili: >> >> >>> On Apr 11, 2024, at 21:17, Tomas Härdin wrote: >>> >>> tor 2024-04-11 klockan 20:16 +0800 skrev Zhao Zhili: We don’t have a minimum required version of Android in FFmpeg. libavdevice/android_camera requires Android 7, Java MediaCodec requires Android 4.1, and NDK MediaCodec requires Android 5.0. Without an explicit version, it’s unclear for development and test. Android 5.0 is released in 2014, is it OK to bump the minimum required version to Android 5.0, or any other version you prefer? >>> >>> Don't we already have stuff that detects the Android version and >>> acts >>> accordingly? Dropping 4.1 might lessen the maintenance burden >>> though. >> >> Check Android API level is easy. There is [no] minimum API level >> requirement >> in configure script as far as I know. > > Would be a good idea to add one > > What would dropping 4.1 support actually look like? I presume it would > make the code a lot simpler. I can remove a lot of dlsym by link directly. And it will be more clear to know how to handle Android version dependent API when adding new code. > >>> I have an old phone (Samsung Galaxy S5) running the most recent >>> LineageOS possible to install on it (16.0), and that uses Android >>> 9. So >>> for me bumping to version 5 sounds fine. >>> >>> Do you have any statistics on Android versions actually in use? >> >> Search by "Android distribution chart" shows version >= 5.0 is about >> 99.3%. > > Makes me wonder what kind of devices people run that haven't been > updated in 10+ years.. Like TV and OTT box. I know those devices exist, but I highly doubt that anyone would attempt to run FFmpeg 7.1 on it. Android toolchains also drop support of Android 4.4 now. "KitKat (APIs 19 and 20) is no longer supported.” https://developer.android.com/ndk/downloads/revision_history > > Compare to the recent Debian and Ubuntu support discussion, where we're > considering dropping support for 5 year old releases. Dropping support > for 10 year old ones doesn't sound bad. You're also the one most > involved in Android support, so unless someone else wants to take on > the maintenance burden I say go for it. If downstream apps make a fuss, > they can either take on the work themselves or pay. > > /Tomas > ___ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Bump minimum required version of Android to 5.0
Tomas Härdin (12024-04-12): > Makes me wonder what kind of devices people run that haven't been > updated in 10+ years.. The kind of devices that no longer get software updates but the owner cannot afford to replace. -- Nicolas George ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Bump minimum required version of Android to 5.0
tor 2024-04-11 klockan 21:57 +0800 skrev Zhao Zhili: > > > > On Apr 11, 2024, at 21:17, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > > > tor 2024-04-11 klockan 20:16 +0800 skrev Zhao Zhili: > > > We don’t have a minimum required version of Android in FFmpeg. > > > libavdevice/android_camera requires Android 7, Java MediaCodec > > > requires Android 4.1, and NDK MediaCodec requires Android 5.0. > > > > > > Without an explicit version, it’s unclear for development and > > > test. > > > > > > Android 5.0 is released in 2014, is it OK to bump the minimum > > > required > > > version to Android 5.0, or any other version you prefer? > > > > Don't we already have stuff that detects the Android version and > > acts > > accordingly? Dropping 4.1 might lessen the maintenance burden > > though. > > Check Android API level is easy. There is [no] minimum API level > requirement > in configure script as far as I know. Would be a good idea to add one What would dropping 4.1 support actually look like? I presume it would make the code a lot simpler. > > I have an old phone (Samsung Galaxy S5) running the most recent > > LineageOS possible to install on it (16.0), and that uses Android > > 9. So > > for me bumping to version 5 sounds fine. > > > > Do you have any statistics on Android versions actually in use? > > Search by "Android distribution chart" shows version >= 5.0 is about > 99.3%. Makes me wonder what kind of devices people run that haven't been updated in 10+ years.. Compare to the recent Debian and Ubuntu support discussion, where we're considering dropping support for 5 year old releases. Dropping support for 10 year old ones doesn't sound bad. You're also the one most involved in Android support, so unless someone else wants to take on the maintenance burden I say go for it. If downstream apps make a fuss, they can either take on the work themselves or pay. /Tomas ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Bump minimum required version of Android to 5.0
> 在 2024年4月11日，下午9:57，Zhao Zhili 写道： > > >> >> On Apr 11, 2024, at 21:17, Tomas Härdin wrote: >> >> tor 2024-04-11 klockan 20:16 +0800 skrev Zhao Zhili: >>> We don’t have a minimum required version of Android in FFmpeg. >>> libavdevice/android_camera requires Android 7, Java MediaCodec >>> requires Android 4.1, and NDK MediaCodec requires Android 5.0. >>> >>> Without an explicit version, it’s unclear for development and test. >>> >>> Android 5.0 is released in 2014, is it OK to bump the minimum >>> required >>> version to Android 5.0, or any other version you prefer? >> >> Don't we already have stuff that detects the Android version and acts >> accordingly? Dropping 4.1 might lessen the maintenance burden though. > > Check Android API level is easy. There is minimum API level requirement > in configure script as far as I know. I mean there is no minimum API level requirement in configure. >> >> I have an old phone (Samsung Galaxy S5) running the most recent >> LineageOS possible to install on it (16.0), and that uses Android 9. So >> for me bumping to version 5 sounds fine. >> >> Do you have any statistics on Android versions actually in use? > > Search by "Android distribution chart" shows version >= 5.0 is about 99.3%. > >> >> /Tomas >> ___ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email >> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Bump minimum required version of Android to 5.0
> On Apr 11, 2024, at 21:17, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > tor 2024-04-11 klockan 20:16 +0800 skrev Zhao Zhili: >> We don’t have a minimum required version of Android in FFmpeg. >> libavdevice/android_camera requires Android 7, Java MediaCodec >> requires Android 4.1, and NDK MediaCodec requires Android 5.0. >> >> Without an explicit version, it’s unclear for development and test. >> >> Android 5.0 is released in 2014, is it OK to bump the minimum >> required >> version to Android 5.0, or any other version you prefer? > > Don't we already have stuff that detects the Android version and acts > accordingly? Dropping 4.1 might lessen the maintenance burden though. Check Android API level is easy. There is minimum API level requirement in configure script as far as I know. > > I have an old phone (Samsung Galaxy S5) running the most recent > LineageOS possible to install on it (16.0), and that uses Android 9. So > for me bumping to version 5 sounds fine. > > Do you have any statistics on Android versions actually in use? Search by "Android distribution chart" shows version >= 5.0 is about 99.3%. > > /Tomas > ___ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Bump minimum required version of Android to 5.0
tor 2024-04-11 klockan 20:16 +0800 skrev Zhao Zhili: > We don’t have a minimum required version of Android in FFmpeg. > libavdevice/android_camera requires Android 7, Java MediaCodec > requires Android 4.1, and NDK MediaCodec requires Android 5.0. > > Without an explicit version, it’s unclear for development and test. > > Android 5.0 is released in 2014, is it OK to bump the minimum > required > version to Android 5.0, or any other version you prefer? Don't we already have stuff that detects the Android version and acts accordingly? Dropping 4.1 might lessen the maintenance burden though. I have an old phone (Samsung Galaxy S5) running the most recent LineageOS possible to install on it (16.0), and that uses Android 9. So for me bumping to version 5 sounds fine. Do you have any statistics on Android versions actually in use? /Tomas ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Bump minimum required version of Android to 5.0
We don’t have a minimum required version of Android in FFmpeg. libavdevice/android_camera requires Android 7, Java MediaCodec requires Android 4.1, and NDK MediaCodec requires Android 5.0. Without an explicit version, it’s unclear for development and test. Android 5.0 is released in 2014, is it OK to bump the minimum required version to Android 5.0, or any other version you prefer? ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
