Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct [was: Re: [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder]
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 12:53 AM James Almer wrote:
>
> On 12/26/2023 7:40 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 11:20 PM Ronald S. Bultje
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Paul,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >>
> >>> Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing.
> >>>
> >>
> >> the CC requests that you please refrain from attacking fellow FFmpeg
> >> contributors ("what serious feature [have] you contributed? - Nothing")
> on
> >> the mailinglist.
> >>
> >
> > I object here to your dictatorship trolling.
> >
> > Your are selectively picking what to comment and censor.
>
> What did the phrase Ronald quoted add to the conversation? Do you
> consider that being civil? Because pretty much no one does.
> Why can't people discuss and exchange opinions without talking shit to
> each other?
>
> This ML has a very bad reputation because things like that are rampant,
> so it has to stop. How will anyone want to contribute if the threat of
> being shit talked for no reason is always looming?
>
Talk with Thardin, cowboy coding subtle calling and triggering begin with
that entity mails.
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct [was: Re: [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder]
On 12/26/2023 7:40 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 11:20 PM Ronald S. Bultje
wrote:
Paul,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing.
the CC requests that you please refrain from attacking fellow FFmpeg
contributors ("what serious feature [have] you contributed? - Nothing") on
the mailinglist.
I object here to your dictatorship trolling.
Your are selectively picking what to comment and censor.
What did the phrase Ronald quoted add to the conversation? Do you
consider that being civil? Because pretty much no one does.
Why can't people discuss and exchange opinions without talking shit to
each other?
This ML has a very bad reputation because things like that are rampant,
so it has to stop. How will anyone want to contribute if the threat of
being shit talked for no reason is always looming?
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct [was: Re: [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder]
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 11:20 PM Ronald S. Bultje
wrote:
> Paul,
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
> > Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing.
> >
>
> the CC requests that you please refrain from attacking fellow FFmpeg
> contributors ("what serious feature [have] you contributed? - Nothing") on
> the mailinglist.
>
I object here to your dictatorship trolling.
Your are selectively picking what to comment and censor.
Your cowboy show is over!
>
> Signed unanimously,
> the CC illuminati (Anton, James, Jean-Baptiste, Michael, Ronald)
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
[FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct [was: Re: [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder]
Paul,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing.
>
the CC requests that you please refrain from attacking fellow FFmpeg
contributors ("what serious feature [have] you contributed? - Nothing") on
the mailinglist.
Signed unanimously,
the CC illuminati (Anton, James, Jean-Baptiste, Michael, Ronald)
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
[FFmpeg-devel] Mailinglist conduct [was: Re: [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder]
Hi Nicolas, On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:31 PM Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12023-12-21): > > Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing. > > I did not want to say it, but since it is now in the open: Not nothing: > negative. His naysaying discouraged me from working further on the > built-in documentation system. > The CC deems some of your statements in this thread (here: "Not nothing: negative", and later on: "Then you need to find a different project.") to be personal attacks, in violation of our code of conduct. The CC requests that you stop such behaviour at once and refrain from it in the future. Remember that the CC has the option to take away mailinglist privileges. Unanimously signed, The CC illuminati (Anton, James, Jean-Baptiste, Michael, Ronald) ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
