Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 12/24] avcodec/mjpegenc: add support for non-YUVJ formats

2018-05-02 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 2 May 2018 at 19:46, wm4  wrote:

> On Wed, 2 May 2018 19:37:27 +0100
> Rostislav Pehlivanov  wrote:
>
> > On 2 May 2018 at 19:16, wm4  wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2 May 2018 19:14:21 +0100
> > > Rostislav Pehlivanov  wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2 May 2018 at 19:04, Marton Balint  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 1 May 2018, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1 May 2018 at 23:22, Paul B Mahol  wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 5/2/18, Michael Niedermayer  wrote:
> > > > >>> > Hi
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > > > >>> >> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol 
> > > > >>> >> ---
> > > > >>> >>  libavcodec/mjpegenc.c  | 5 -
> > > > >>> >>  libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c | 3 +--
> > > > >>> >>  tests/lavf-regression.sh   | 2 +-
> > > > >>> >>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > This doesnt work
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> It does work, if you want full range set full range as option.
> > > > >>> Check visually colors.
> > > > >>> This happens because rgb is still marked incorrectly as limited
> > > range,
> > > > >>> so limited is picked instead.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >> Shouldn't this be part of the patchset?
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought that color_range only matters for YUV formats, for RGB
> it is
> > > > > ignored. If it was decided to support limited RGB, then please
> update
> > > the
> > > > > docs of AVCOL_RANGE_JPEG/MPEG. Otherwise the color_range of an
> RGB
> > > format
> > > > > should not matter.
> > > > >
> > > > > On the other hand, if we decide to support limited RGB, then maybe
> a
> > > new
> > > > > member in color_range is better, this way we are able to specify
> more
> > > > > easily that we support limited YUV and full range RGB. (like ffplay
> > > > > typically does).
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Limited range RGB does NOT exist in the computer world, and I don't
> give
> > > a
> > > > fuck if broadcasting uses it. I've fought hard to keep it from
> getting
> > > into
> > > > AV1.
> > > > So no, we will not be supporting limited range RGB.
> > >
> > > You're very wrong. GPUs and HDMI (basically trash fire consumer
> > > garbage) sometimes seem to require you to feed limited RGB.
> > > ___
> > > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> > >
> >
> > Maybe if you took a second to read what I wrote. HDMI sometimes requires
> > limited range rgb because its derived from broadcasting junk where they
> had
> > technical limitations they weren't smart enough to overcome. GPUs can
> > generate or convert RGB to limited range only for transmission, through
> the
> > use of gamma LUTs I believe.
>
> By that logic, aren't all mpeg style codecs (including vp9, av1, etc.)
> also "broadcasting junk"? I mean, even YUV could be full range if it
> weren't for broadcasting legacy.
>

Not exactly, limited range YUV is a solution to an issue - out of gamut
colors. Its not the way this should have been solved though, out of the few
other ways I can think of.


> Either way, limited range RGB does NOT exist in computers, as in, not
> > inside codecs, nor is there anything supporting such, and we will
> certainly
> > not start doing it.
>
> Denial of reality, I guess.
>

Reality in a virtual world? No thanks, its whatever you make it.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 12/24] avcodec/mjpegenc: add support for non-YUVJ formats

2018-05-02 Thread wm4
On Wed, 2 May 2018 19:37:27 +0100
Rostislav Pehlivanov  wrote:

> On 2 May 2018 at 19:16, wm4  wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2 May 2018 19:14:21 +0100
> > Rostislav Pehlivanov  wrote:
> >  
> > > On 2 May 2018 at 19:04, Marton Balint  wrote:
> > >  
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 1 May 2018, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 1 May 2018 at 23:22, Paul B Mahol  wrote:  
> > > >>
> > > >> On 5/2/18, Michael Niedermayer  wrote:  
> > > >>> > Hi
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:  
> > > >>> >> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol 
> > > >>> >> ---
> > > >>> >>  libavcodec/mjpegenc.c  | 5 -
> > > >>> >>  libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c | 3 +--
> > > >>> >>  tests/lavf-regression.sh   | 2 +-
> > > >>> >>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)  
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > This doesnt work  
> > > >>>
> > > >>> It does work, if you want full range set full range as option.
> > > >>> Check visually colors.
> > > >>> This happens because rgb is still marked incorrectly as limited  
> > range,  
> > > >>> so limited is picked instead.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  
> > > >> Shouldn't this be part of the patchset?
> > > >>  
> > > >
> > > > I thought that color_range only matters for YUV formats, for RGB it is
> > > > ignored. If it was decided to support limited RGB, then please update  
> > the  
> > > > docs of AVCOL_RANGE_JPEG/MPEG. Otherwise the color_range of an RGB  
> > format  
> > > > should not matter.
> > > >
> > > > On the other hand, if we decide to support limited RGB, then maybe a  
> > new  
> > > > member in color_range is better, this way we are able to specify more
> > > > easily that we support limited YUV and full range RGB. (like ffplay
> > > > typically does).
> > > >  
> > >
> > > Limited range RGB does NOT exist in the computer world, and I don't give  
> > a  
> > > fuck if broadcasting uses it. I've fought hard to keep it from getting  
> > into  
> > > AV1.
> > > So no, we will not be supporting limited range RGB.  
> >
> > You're very wrong. GPUs and HDMI (basically trash fire consumer
> > garbage) sometimes seem to require you to feed limited RGB.
> > ___
> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> >  
> 
> Maybe if you took a second to read what I wrote. HDMI sometimes requires
> limited range rgb because its derived from broadcasting junk where they had
> technical limitations they weren't smart enough to overcome. GPUs can
> generate or convert RGB to limited range only for transmission, through the
> use of gamma LUTs I believe.

By that logic, aren't all mpeg style codecs (including vp9, av1, etc.)
also "broadcasting junk"? I mean, even YUV could be full range if it
weren't for broadcasting legacy.

> Either way, limited range RGB does NOT exist in computers, as in, not
> inside codecs, nor is there anything supporting such, and we will certainly
> not start doing it.

Denial of reality, I guess.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 12/24] avcodec/mjpegenc: add support for non-YUVJ formats

2018-05-02 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 2 May 2018 at 19:16, wm4  wrote:

> On Wed, 2 May 2018 19:14:21 +0100
> Rostislav Pehlivanov  wrote:
>
> > On 2 May 2018 at 19:04, Marton Balint  wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 1 May 2018, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1 May 2018 at 23:22, Paul B Mahol  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 5/2/18, Michael Niedermayer  wrote:
> > >>> > Hi
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > >>> >> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol 
> > >>> >> ---
> > >>> >>  libavcodec/mjpegenc.c  | 5 -
> > >>> >>  libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c | 3 +--
> > >>> >>  tests/lavf-regression.sh   | 2 +-
> > >>> >>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >>> >
> > >>> > This doesnt work
> > >>>
> > >>> It does work, if you want full range set full range as option.
> > >>> Check visually colors.
> > >>> This happens because rgb is still marked incorrectly as limited
> range,
> > >>> so limited is picked instead.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> Shouldn't this be part of the patchset?
> > >>
> > >
> > > I thought that color_range only matters for YUV formats, for RGB it is
> > > ignored. If it was decided to support limited RGB, then please update
> the
> > > docs of AVCOL_RANGE_JPEG/MPEG. Otherwise the color_range of an RGB
> format
> > > should not matter.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, if we decide to support limited RGB, then maybe a
> new
> > > member in color_range is better, this way we are able to specify more
> > > easily that we support limited YUV and full range RGB. (like ffplay
> > > typically does).
> > >
> >
> > Limited range RGB does NOT exist in the computer world, and I don't give
> a
> > fuck if broadcasting uses it. I've fought hard to keep it from getting
> into
> > AV1.
> > So no, we will not be supporting limited range RGB.
>
> You're very wrong. GPUs and HDMI (basically trash fire consumer
> garbage) sometimes seem to require you to feed limited RGB.
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>

Maybe if you took a second to read what I wrote. HDMI sometimes requires
limited range rgb because its derived from broadcasting junk where they had
technical limitations they weren't smart enough to overcome. GPUs can
generate or convert RGB to limited range only for transmission, through the
use of gamma LUTs I believe.

Either way, limited range RGB does NOT exist in computers, as in, not
inside codecs, nor is there anything supporting such, and we will certainly
not start doing it.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 12/24] avcodec/mjpegenc: add support for non-YUVJ formats

2018-05-02 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 2 May 2018 at 19:04, Marton Balint  wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, 1 May 2018, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
>
> On 1 May 2018 at 23:22, Paul B Mahol  wrote:
>>
>> On 5/2/18, Michael Niedermayer  wrote:
>>> > Hi
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>>> >> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol 
>>> >> ---
>>> >>  libavcodec/mjpegenc.c  | 5 -
>>> >>  libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c | 3 +--
>>> >>  tests/lavf-regression.sh   | 2 +-
>>> >>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>> >
>>> > This doesnt work
>>>
>>> It does work, if you want full range set full range as option.
>>> Check visually colors.
>>> This happens because rgb is still marked incorrectly as limited range,
>>> so limited is picked instead.
>>>
>>>
>> Shouldn't this be part of the patchset?
>>
>
> I thought that color_range only matters for YUV formats, for RGB it is
> ignored. If it was decided to support limited RGB, then please update the
> docs of AVCOL_RANGE_JPEG/MPEG. Otherwise the color_range of an RGB format
> should not matter.
>
> On the other hand, if we decide to support limited RGB, then maybe a new
> member in color_range is better, this way we are able to specify more
> easily that we support limited YUV and full range RGB. (like ffplay
> typically does).
>

Limited range RGB does NOT exist in the computer world, and I don't give a
fuck if broadcasting uses it. I've fought hard to keep it from getting into
AV1.
So no, we will not be supporting limited range RGB.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 12/24] avcodec/mjpegenc: add support for non-YUVJ formats

2018-05-02 Thread wm4
On Wed, 2 May 2018 19:14:21 +0100
Rostislav Pehlivanov  wrote:

> On 2 May 2018 at 19:04, Marton Balint  wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 1 May 2018, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> >
> > On 1 May 2018 at 23:22, Paul B Mahol  wrote:  
> >>
> >> On 5/2/18, Michael Niedermayer  wrote:  
> >>> > Hi
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:  
> >>> >> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol 
> >>> >> ---
> >>> >>  libavcodec/mjpegenc.c  | 5 -
> >>> >>  libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c | 3 +--
> >>> >>  tests/lavf-regression.sh   | 2 +-
> >>> >>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)  
> >>> >
> >>> > This doesnt work  
> >>>
> >>> It does work, if you want full range set full range as option.
> >>> Check visually colors.
> >>> This happens because rgb is still marked incorrectly as limited range,
> >>> so limited is picked instead.
> >>>
> >>>  
> >> Shouldn't this be part of the patchset?
> >>  
> >
> > I thought that color_range only matters for YUV formats, for RGB it is
> > ignored. If it was decided to support limited RGB, then please update the
> > docs of AVCOL_RANGE_JPEG/MPEG. Otherwise the color_range of an RGB format
> > should not matter.
> >
> > On the other hand, if we decide to support limited RGB, then maybe a new
> > member in color_range is better, this way we are able to specify more
> > easily that we support limited YUV and full range RGB. (like ffplay
> > typically does).
> >  
> 
> Limited range RGB does NOT exist in the computer world, and I don't give a
> fuck if broadcasting uses it. I've fought hard to keep it from getting into
> AV1.
> So no, we will not be supporting limited range RGB.

You're very wrong. GPUs and HDMI (basically trash fire consumer
garbage) sometimes seem to require you to feed limited RGB.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 12/24] avcodec/mjpegenc: add support for non-YUVJ formats

2018-05-02 Thread Marton Balint



On Tue, 1 May 2018, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:


On 1 May 2018 at 23:22, Paul B Mahol  wrote:


On 5/2/18, Michael Niedermayer  wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol 
>> ---
>>  libavcodec/mjpegenc.c  | 5 -
>>  libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c | 3 +--
>>  tests/lavf-regression.sh   | 2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> This doesnt work

It does work, if you want full range set full range as option.
Check visually colors.
This happens because rgb is still marked incorrectly as limited range,
so limited is picked instead.



Shouldn't this be part of the patchset?


I thought that color_range only matters for YUV formats, for RGB it is 
ignored. If it was decided to support limited RGB, then please update the 
docs of AVCOL_RANGE_JPEG/MPEG. Otherwise the color_range of an RGB format 
should not matter.


On the other hand, if we decide to support limited RGB, then maybe a new 
member in color_range is better, this way we are able to specify more 
easily that we support limited YUV and full range RGB. (like ffplay 
typically does).


Thanks,
Marton
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 12/24] avcodec/mjpegenc: add support for non-YUVJ formats

2018-05-01 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 12:22:10AM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 5/2/18, Michael Niedermayer  wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol 
> >> ---
> >>  libavcodec/mjpegenc.c  | 5 -
> >>  libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c | 3 +--
> >>  tests/lavf-regression.sh   | 2 +-
> >>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > This doesnt work
> 
> It does work, if you want full range set full range as option.


> Check visually colors.

They vissually look wrong too same as the gimp color picker would suggest


> This happens because rgb is still marked incorrectly as limited range,
> so limited is picked instead.

no, that is not the problem.
We could take a mpeg2 file as input which is limited range "always"
that takes rgb completely out of the picture
and you still should have a jpeg file that will look wrong vissually 
in many jpeg decoders.

libavcodec supports the inofficial limited range extension so that will look
correct.


> 
> >
> > first create a input file
> > ./ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc=640x480 test.ppm
> > (if you like check that this has correct white and black) 0,0,0 and
> > 255,255,255
> >
> > now convert to jpeg
> > ./ffmpeg -i test.ppm test.jpg
> > gimp test.jpg
> >
> > white and black have RGB values: 16,16,16 and 235,235,235 thats not correct
> > and also looks wrong
> >
> > the strict_std_compliance check that was before this cannot be just droped
> >
> > If you want jpeg images to interoperate with all software they must be full
> >
> > range
> > the limited range is a not entirely official feature. So it should not be
> > used by default
> > (that is AFAIK, things may have changed and maybe theres a official way now
> >  but from what i remember there was not for images)
> 
> Better check actual paper.

I think whoever changes what the encoder outputs should check it
its JFIF 1.02 for images. See "Conversion to and from RGB"

"Y, Cb, and Cr are converted from R, G, and B as defined in CCIR Recommendation 
601
 but are normalized so as to occupy the full 256 levels of a 8-bit binary 
encoding."
 

 
[...]
-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Does the universe only have a finite lifespan? No, its going to go on
forever, its just that you wont like living in it. -- Hiranya Peiri


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 12/24] avcodec/mjpegenc: add support for non-YUVJ formats

2018-05-01 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 1 May 2018 at 23:22, Paul B Mahol  wrote:

> On 5/2/18, Michael Niedermayer  wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol 
> >> ---
> >>  libavcodec/mjpegenc.c  | 5 -
> >>  libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c | 3 +--
> >>  tests/lavf-regression.sh   | 2 +-
> >>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > This doesnt work
>
> It does work, if you want full range set full range as option.
> Check visually colors.
> This happens because rgb is still marked incorrectly as limited range,
> so limited is picked instead.
>

Shouldn't this be part of the patchset?
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 12/24] avcodec/mjpegenc: add support for non-YUVJ formats

2018-05-01 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 5/2/18, Michael Niedermayer  wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol 
>> ---
>>  libavcodec/mjpegenc.c  | 5 -
>>  libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c | 3 +--
>>  tests/lavf-regression.sh   | 2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> This doesnt work

It does work, if you want full range set full range as option.
Check visually colors.
This happens because rgb is still marked incorrectly as limited range,
so limited is picked instead.

>
> first create a input file
> ./ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc=640x480 test.ppm
> (if you like check that this has correct white and black) 0,0,0 and
> 255,255,255
>
> now convert to jpeg
> ./ffmpeg -i test.ppm test.jpg
> gimp test.jpg
>
> white and black have RGB values: 16,16,16 and 235,235,235 thats not correct
> and also looks wrong
>
> the strict_std_compliance check that was before this cannot be just droped
>
> If you want jpeg images to interoperate with all software they must be full
>
> range
> the limited range is a not entirely official feature. So it should not be
> used by default
> (that is AFAIK, things may have changed and maybe theres a official way now
>  but from what i remember there was not for images)

Better check actual paper.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 12/24] avcodec/mjpegenc: add support for non-YUVJ formats

2018-05-01 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi

On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol 
> ---
>  libavcodec/mjpegenc.c  | 5 -
>  libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c | 3 +--
>  tests/lavf-regression.sh   | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

This doesnt work

first create a input file
./ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc=640x480 test.ppm
(if you like check that this has correct white and black) 0,0,0 and 255,255,255

now convert to jpeg
./ffmpeg -i test.ppm test.jpg
gimp test.jpg

white and black have RGB values: 16,16,16 and 235,235,235 thats not correct
and also looks wrong

the strict_std_compliance check that was before this cannot be just droped

If you want jpeg images to interoperate with all software they must be full 
range 
the limited range is a not entirely official feature. So it should not be
used by default
(that is AFAIK, things may have changed and maybe theres a official way now
 but from what i remember there was not for images)




[...]
-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Never trust a computer, one day, it may think you are the virus. -- Compn


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 12/24] avcodec/mjpegenc: add support for non-YUVJ formats

2017-12-13 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 08:31:22PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:59:28AM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol 
> > ---
> >  libavcodec/mjpegenc.c | 5 -
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> this breaks:
> 
> ./ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -vcodec mjpeg -strict -2 -t 0.5  mjpeg.avi

heres another case which breaks: (errors out)
./ffmpeg -y -i fate-suite/lena.pnm -pix_fmt +yuv420p -vf scale -strict -1 
test.jpg

[...]

-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

What does censorship reveal? It reveals fear. -- Julian Assange


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 12/24] avcodec/mjpegenc: add support for non-YUVJ formats

2017-12-13 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:59:28AM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol 
> ---
>  libavcodec/mjpegenc.c | 5 -
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

this breaks:

./ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -vcodec mjpeg -strict -2 -t 0.5  mjpeg.avi

[...]
-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Its not that you shouldnt use gotos but rather that you should write
readable code and code with gotos often but not always is less readable


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel