Re: [FFmpeg-devel] End of the top-posting
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Nicolas George wrote: Le duodi 22 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Mats Peterson a écrit : Now, let's not split hairs. Be happy that I have stopped the top-posting instead. Not that I care a lot what you think. It has not taken you a long time to show your true colors here too. For the record, this was the guy who started insulting Carl Eugen on the second or third comment of a trac ticket. Since the patches are technically bad too, I will ignore these mails from now on. Regards, -- Nicolas George The patches WERE technically bad, that's why I fixed them. Mats -- Mats Peterson http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] End of the top-posting
Le duodi 22 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Mats Peterson a écrit : > Oh, such a lovely reply. Too bad you did only take a very small part into account. What did you not understand in "trimmed interleaved posting"? Regards, -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] End of the top-posting
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Nicolas George wrote: Le duodi 22 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Mats Peterson a écrit : I am happy to announce that I will now be using Alpine instead of the Yahoo I must admit, I do not care very much what you do with your life. Would you also tell us what you ate for breakfast? website for posting to this mailing list, since the accepted policy here seems to be bottom-posting only. No. The preferred policy is trimmed interleaved posting. Untrimmed interleaved posting is tolerated. -- Mats Peterson Your signature marker is invalid, it must contain a trailing space. Regards, -- Nicolas George Oh, such a lovely reply. Thanks for notifying me about the space though, I haven't been using mail or news in console for quite a while. Fixed. -- Mats Peterson http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] End of the top-posting
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Mats Peterson wrote: On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Nicolas George wrote: Le duodi 22 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Mats Peterson a écrit : Oh, such a lovely reply. Too bad you did only take a very small part into account. What did you not understand in "trimmed interleaved posting"? Regards, -- Nicolas George Now, let's not split hairs. Be happy that I have stopped the top-posting instead. Mats -- Mats Peterson http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel Not that I care a lot what you think. -- Mats Peterson http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] End of the top-posting
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Nicolas George wrote: Le duodi 22 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Mats Peterson a écrit : Oh, such a lovely reply. Too bad you did only take a very small part into account. What did you not understand in "trimmed interleaved posting"? Regards, -- Nicolas George Now, let's not split hairs. Be happy that I have stopped the top-posting instead. Mats -- Mats Peterson http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] End of the top-posting
Le duodi 22 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Mats Peterson a écrit : > I am happy to announce that I will now be using Alpine instead of the Yahoo I must admit, I do not care very much what you do with your life. Would you also tell us what you ate for breakfast? > website for posting to this mailing list, since the accepted policy here > seems to be bottom-posting only. No. The preferred policy is trimmed interleaved posting. Untrimmed interleaved posting is tolerated. > -- > Mats Peterson Your signature marker is invalid, it must contain a trailing space. Regards, -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] End of the top-posting
Le duodi 22 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Mats Peterson a écrit : > >Now, let's not split hairs. Be happy that I have stopped the top-posting > >instead. > Not that I care a lot what you think. It has not taken you a long time to show your true colors here too. For the record, this was the guy who started insulting Carl Eugen on the second or third comment of a trac ticket. Since the patches are technically bad too, I will ignore these mails from now on. Regards, -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] End of the top-posting
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Mats Petersonwrote: [...] > Even with the first patch, there isn't a lot to be technically bad about, > since it concerns something as simple as putting the palette in extradata. > Calling a function in mov.c could perhaps be viewed as being remotely > technically bad, but that's fixed long ago. You just seem to like to bitch. > I have excused myself for my initial behaviour at the bug tracker, but if > you like dig around in old sh*t, please go ahead. But you won't get any > sympathy from me. Please refrain from such language ("bitch", "sh*t"). It is not good for ffmpeg-devel, and moreover such extreme language has a tendency of resulting in needless escalation. ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] End of the top-posting
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Mats Petersonwrote: [...] Even with the first patch, there isn't a lot to be technically bad about, since it concerns something as simple as putting the palette in extradata. Calling a function in mov.c could perhaps be viewed as being remotely technically bad, but that's fixed long ago. You just seem to like to bitch. I have excused myself for my initial behaviour at the bug tracker, but if you like dig around in old sh*t, please go ahead. But you won't get any sympathy from me. Please refrain from such language ("bitch", "sh*t"). It is not good for ffmpeg-devel, and moreover such extreme language has a tendency of resulting in needless escalation. ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel No problem. He shouldn't tell me that the patch is technically bad, anyway, and then ignore me. That's utterly childish behaviour. Mats -- Mats Peterson http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] End of the top-posting
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Nicolas George wrote: Since the patches are technically bad too, I will ignore these mails from now on. Regards, -- Nicolas George Even with the first patch, there isn't a lot to be technically bad about, since it concerns something as simple as putting the palette in extradata. Calling a function in mov.c could perhaps be viewed as being remotely technically bad, but that's fixed long ago. You just seem to like to bitch. I have excused myself for my initial behaviour at the bug tracker, but if you like dig around in old sh*t, please go ahead. But you won't get any sympathy from me. Mats -- Mats Peterson http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] End of the top-posting
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Mats Peterson wrote: On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Nicolas George wrote: Le duodi 22 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Mats Peterson a écrit : Now, let's not split hairs. Be happy that I have stopped the top-posting instead. Not that I care a lot what you think. It has not taken you a long time to show your true colors here too. For the record, this was the guy who started insulting Carl Eugen on the second or third comment of a trac ticket. Since the patches are technically bad too, I will ignore these mails from now on. Regards, -- Nicolas George The patches WERE technically bad, that's why I fixed them. Mats You could always try and do it better yourself. And I'm talking about the SECOND patch posted here, not the hack that calls a function in mov.c. Mats -- Mats Peterson http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel