Re: [FFmpeg-user] Convert WAV to FLAC
Am 31.03.22 um 22:19 schrieb Paul B Mahol: P.S.: Let's see what kind of insults this contribution provokes. Provocations are not tolerated here lol ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Convert WAV to FLAC
Am 31.03.22 um 21:56 schrieb Wolfgang Hugemann: because I can create .bat files and convert multiple files at once. The original FLAC encoder also has a command line interface, and I actually used it for bulk conversion of WAVs via batch. For just audio conversion, I would rather use the original software than ffmpeg people don't realize that for most cases ffmpeg is just a wrapper and for mp3 as example ikt's still too dumb for joint-stereo after decades (impressive given that it uses lame which clearly supports it) ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Convert WAV to FLAC
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:12 PM Wolfgang Hugemann wrote: > I would rather use FLACs original frontend (than ffmpeg), which also > provides a nice Windows GUI interface. FLAC conversion is also included > in a variety of software products, i.e. Exact Audio Copy, which I used > to rip all my music CDs. > > Wolfgang Hugemann > > P.S.: Let's see what kind of insults this contribution provokes. > Provocations are not tolerated here. > ___ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Convert WAV to FLAC
because I can create .bat files and convert multiple files at once. The original FLAC encoder also has a command line interface, and I actually used it for bulk conversion of WAVs via batch. For just audio conversion, I would rather use the original software than ffmpeg. In regard to VBR: I would rather consider this as an inevitable consequence of entropy compression: More repetitive sections of the WAV (say a single note repeated several times) will be compressed more effectively than more complex parts of the WAV. Nothing to worry about. Wolfgang Hugemann ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] LUFS Normalization of WAV files
On Wednesday, March 30, 2022, 03:39:41 PM PDT, CMG DiGiTaL wrote: Em qua., 30 de mar. de 2022 às 07:27, CMG DiGiTaL escreveu: > Better use ebur128 scanner filter, it is much faster, after it reports >> values, just apply volume filter. >> > > >> loudnorm dynamic processing is not perfect. > > > hi Paul, > Really?... based on the command line I sent, how could I do it the way you > are saying?... can I use the same > command changing some parameters or would it be a completely different > command? How can I do it the way > you suggested? > > thanks > hi Paul, I've already managed to create a bat using ebur128, ok?. I did some tests too and didn't see a big difference with loudnorm, but I'll keep testing other audio formats with it. Below is one of the tests I did: ffmpeg -hide_banner -i "C:\Users\CMG\Desktop\WAV audio LUFS\audio.wav" -af ebur128 -f null NUL Integrated loudness: I: *-8.8* LUFS Threshold: *-18.8* LUFS Loudness range: LRA: 2.0 LU Threshold: -28.8 LUFS LRA low: -9.7 LUFS LRA high: -7.8 LUFS - ffmpeg -hide_banner -i "C:\Users\CMG\Desktop\WAV audio LUFS\audio.wav" -af "[0:a]loudnorm=print_format=summary" -f null NUL Input Integrated: *-8.9* LUFS Input True Peak: +0.7 dBTP Input LRA: 2.0 LU Input Threshold: *-18.9* LUFS Output Integrated: -23.8 LUFS Output True Peak: -13.8 dBTP Output LRA: 1.7 LU Output Threshold: -33.8 LUFS Normalization Type: Dynamic Target Offset: -0.2 L if we analyze the Threshold inputs, the difference is 0.1dB of loudness. I don't know if in an example with another song, it might actually make a bigger difference, but in this case, there wasn't a significant difference! thanks ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
