Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
<> can we kill this 'obviously snowflake Reddit user' thread? you get expert info from expert developers and they want to give 15min of expert advice for free but not have their time wasted. When you go to the doctor and they order an x-ray to see if your foot is broken do you insult them with snowflake med school degree insults? Just say thank you and try to get the same expertise elsewhere. <> Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 4, 2023, at 6:17 AM, Dave Blanchard wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 23:39:59 +0100 > Reindl Harald wrote: > >> a working brain is a enough to put the question into the subject instead >> "New user question" and has nothing to do with a mailing list at all > > Please, tell us more about how the OP is too stupid to participate in this > mailing list, from your lofty vantage point in your mom's basement. > > Dave > ___ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
> Now climb back into your HOLE and die. > > Dave I don't think I've seen a worse comment on any thread. As soon as you see that type of post, you know there's either an unstable teen or a damaged individual posting it. No one should ever wish someone to die because your feelies are hurt. Period. Grow up. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question - please
Am 04.02.23 um 18:52 schrieb Patrick Cusack via ffmpeg-user: And yes, asking someone to post their command is the first request everyone makes and for a good reason - common sense and http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise would make that natural * you typed a command line * you got a output * something didn't work so how comes that common sense don't tell you "select the whole stuff and paste it into the mail would make it reproduceable for everyone"? ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question - please
I would encourage people in this forum to be critical to the ends of building other people up. Iron sharpens iron, but sadly the Participants on this thread just care to tear people down. Good luck. This is the last time I’ll be around the ffmpeg mailing list. I’m seen too many of these threads. I have real life issues to focus on. I won’t care to chime in again on any issue. And yes, asking someone to post their command is the first request everyone makes. Good luck guys, Patrick Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 4, 2023, at 8:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > >> Am 04.02.23 um 17:36 schrieb Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user: >> A word of sanity. >> If you're someone new to the ffmpeg-user list who's reading this thread and >> frowning with concern at Reindl's behaviour, believe me, you're not alone > > well, it was "Dave Blanchard" starting with "I don't have time to familiarize > myself with the 6,282,928 special snowflake unique rule systems that every > special snowflake community" > > in fact that was the point where this thread got really bad > ___ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question - please
Am 04.02.23 um 17:36 schrieb Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user: A word of sanity. If you're someone new to the ffmpeg-user list who's reading this thread and frowning with concern at Reindl's behaviour, believe me, you're not alone well, it was "Dave Blanchard" starting with "I don't have time to familiarize myself with the 6,282,928 special snowflake unique rule systems that every special snowflake community" in fact that was the point where this thread got really bad ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question - please
A word of sanity. If you're someone new to the ffmpeg-user list who's reading this thread and frowning with concern at Reindl's behaviour, believe me, you're not alone. I've never met him nor anyone who has met him, but I have occasionally met groups of people who are familiar with his behaviour on this mailing list, and laughed about our shared view of the situation. Based on his behaviour on this list, Reindl is one of the top few most outspokenly, deliberately impolite, unhelpful, unpleasant and unprofessional people I've ever come across in my entire life, and that's saying something. Even in the world of open source software, where we do find a few interesting personalities, he's the standout. He's world famous for being viciously unpleasant for no reason. Reindl Harald is a joke and a punchline, the very epitome of an internet troll. He's been dominating this list with his utter poison for at least fifteen years, to my certain knowledge. It's not you. It's him. We've tried to figure out why he does it. Maybe it's a language barrier. Maybe it's some sort of psychological abnormality (in which case no disrespect, but good grief, man, get help). In the end it's up to him and whoever has authority on the mailing list, and the only surprise is that it's been allowed to go on for so long. - Phil On Saturday, 4 February 2023 at 11:28:07 GMT, Vincent Deconinck wrote: Could we please stop polluting this mailing list ? If you want to continue discussing this, please do it off the list using private mails. Thank you. Vincent. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
Am 04.02.23 um 17:05 schrieb Dave Blanchard: It's spelled "HOLE." IDIOT. wow you found a typo Furthermore your punctuation and grammar also leaves much to be desired. so what And you actually have the balls to trash talk the OP's subject line, and call him an idiot? you poor soul can't distinct between typo/grammar and a completly useless subject? at least i have balls ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
Am 04.02.23 um 16:58 schrieb Dave Blanchard: Yes, you could have indeed ignored the thread, instead of cheapening the discourse with your useless BULLSHIT comment creep away and stop talking about bullshit comments after your "No, I haven't. I don't have time to familiarize myself with the 6,282,928 special snowflake unique rule systems that every special snowflake community on the planet expects everyone to memorize and be intimately familiar with at all times" comment ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
It's spelled "HOLE." IDIOT. If you "had a brain" you'd have known that. Right? Anyone with "common sense" should have known that "HOLE" is not the same word as "WHOLE." Furthermore your punctuation and grammar also leaves much to be desired. And you actually have the balls to trash talk the OP's subject line, and call him an idiot? Your comments prove that what I said from the very beginning is right on point (as it usually is, BTW)--this group, like the internet and Linux community at large, has more than its fair share of antisocial basement dwelling dweebs who are seemingly incapable of treating the end user with respect. Now climb back into your HOLE and die. Dave ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 14:54:40 -0800 Patrick Cusack via ffmpeg-user wrote: > The guy posted an open ended question without any context. And yes having the > command makes a difference. NO, IT DID NOT MAKE A DIFFERENCE, AND COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY MADE ANY DIFFERENCE WHATSOEVER in this case. FOOL. The question was answered JUST FINE before you came into the discussion with your useless reply and foolish attitude. > I know eff all about HAP and perhaps had he included his command I would have > had some more context. Google MF'er, do you even use it? It took me all of 5 seconds to deduce that this was some proprietary codec that is unlikely to be enabled in 99%+ of FFMPEG builds. Somehow Carl was able to make a similar deduction as well, despite presumably also being unfamiliar with HAP. > You could have ignored the thread, instead of cheapening the discourse. Yes, you could have indeed ignored the thread, instead of cheapening the discourse with your useless BULLSHIT comment. If you "know eff all", then what is the actual point of making a comment, when the question was already answered perfectly well by Carl? FOOL. Dave ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
Am 04.02.23 um 00:15 schrieb Dave Blanchard: On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 14:41:46 -0800 amindfv--- via ffmpeg-user wrote: Ironically the single reason this thread has devolved into personal attacks and irrelevance to the original question is your own contributions. "The single reason"? So I'm control of the keyboard of all participants in this thread? no, but looking at the whole thread you creeped out of your hole a day later and didn't write anything useful without you creeping out of your whole the whole thread would only contain 3 messages including the original question so for the sake of god creep back into the whole you are coming from ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
Am 04.02.23 um 00:18 schrieb Dave Blanchard: On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 23:39:59 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: a working brain is a enough to put the question into the subject instead "New user question" and has nothing to do with a mailing list at all Please, tell us more about how the OP is too stupid to participate in this mailing list i didn't say that and the real problem of this thread is that the nonsense below *from you* appears like it would have been a respsone of the OP while you are the fool Am 03.02.23 um 19:26 schrieb Dave Blanchard: > No, I haven't. I don't have time to familiarize myself with the 6,282,928 special snowflake unique rule systems that every special snowflake community on the planet expects everyone to memorize and be intimately familiar with at all times. No one else does, either, whether they're honest enough to admit it or not. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question - please
Could we please stop polluting this mailing list ? If you want to continue discussing this, please do it off the list using private mails. Thank you. Vincent. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
>amindfv--- via ffmpeg-user wrote: >> Ironically the single reason this thread has devolved into personal attacks >> and irrelevance to the original question is your own contributions. > >"The single reason"? So I'm control of the keyboard of all participants in >this thread? > >There was in fact no response necessary to this thread at all, other than >Carl's original email, which actually gave an answer to the person's question. All other comments could be deleted with no loss to the thread. Patrick's comment had no relevance at all to the actual >question. > >> Someone who took the time to read the new user's question asked a polite >> "Please include your command" request, that is all. Maybe they wanted to test the command on their own system for comparison; maybe they had one of the reasons Carl mentioned. > >Except none of that was actually the case. These are all excuses you're >inventing to play devil's advocate, which has nothing to do with actual thread. > >The reply in question was just your typical, ordinary, everyday "OMG SOMEONE >BROKE A RULE, MUST REMIND OF RULES" response--as Carl's followup proved. > >I ask again: how does giving the command line used help in any way solving the >user's problem, in this particular circumstance? > >Interestingly, Carl didn't even bother asking for the command line in his own >response. Seems he didn't need that information to actually answer the question. > >> Even if your messages were intended to increase friendliness to new users, >> they had the opposite effect due to how confrontational they were. I know if I were a new user asking a question here I'd be a lot more scared off by your argumentative messages than a simple "Please include your command" sentence. > >LOL. > >So you wouldn't be at all bothered at being called an idiot by a certain >loser, because your subject line wasn't so great, but would instead be bothered by the guy actually sticking up for your noob self? > >> My 2¢, >> Tom > >Thanks for your input, Tom. Anyone else got a foolish comment to add, before >we move on? > >Dave Yep. DB behaves like a troll, ignoring good advice from experts and standard methods for diagnosing and dealing with technical issues. Looks like a duck, acts like a duck ... it is a duck. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 23:39:59 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > a working brain is a enough to put the question into the subject instead > "New user question" and has nothing to do with a mailing list at all Please, tell us more about how the OP is too stupid to participate in this mailing list, from your lofty vantage point in your mom's basement. Dave ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 14:41:46 -0800 amindfv--- via ffmpeg-user wrote: > Ironically the single reason this thread has devolved into personal attacks > and irrelevance to the original question is your own contributions. "The single reason"? So I'm control of the keyboard of all participants in this thread? There was in fact no response necessary to this thread at all, other than Carl's original email, which actually gave an answer to the person's question. All other comments could be deleted with no loss to the thread. Patrick's comment had no relevance at all to the actual question. > Someone who took the time to read the new user's question asked a polite > "Please include your command" request, that is all. Maybe they wanted to test > the command on their own system for comparison; maybe they had one of the > reasons Carl mentioned. Except none of that was actually the case. These are all excuses you're inventing to play devil's advocate, which has nothing to do with actual thread. The reply in question was just your typical, ordinary, everyday "OMG SOMEONE BROKE A RULE, MUST REMIND OF RULES" response--as Carl's followup proved. I ask again: how does giving the command line used help in any way solving the user's problem, in this particular circumstance? Interestingly, Carl didn't even bother asking for the command line in his own response. Seems he didn't need that information to actually answer the question. > Even if your messages were intended to increase friendliness to new users, > they had the opposite effect due to how confrontational they were. I know if > I were a new user asking a question here I'd be a lot more scared off by your > argumentative messages than a simple "Please include your command" sentence. LOL. So you wouldn't be at all bothered at being called an idiot by a certain loser, because your subject line wasn't so great, but would instead be bothered by the guy actually sticking up for your noob self? > My 2¢, > Tom Thanks for your input, Tom. Anyone else got a foolish comment to add, before we move on? Dave ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
> And how would that help this situation in any way? Do you have anything better to do than make snarky comments? The guy posted an open ended question without any context. And yes having the command makes a difference. I know eff all about HAP and perhaps had he included his command I would have had some more context. You could have ignored the thread, instead of cheapening the discourse. Thanks, Patrick ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
> It seems the focus of many members of this group isn't on actually *helping > people*, but on policing nonsense "rules violations" or finding some way they > can call the user an idiot. Ironically the single reason this thread has devolved into personal attacks and irrelevance to the original question is your own contributions. Someone who took the time to read the new user's question asked a polite "Please include your command" request, that is all. Maybe they wanted to test the command on their own system for comparison; maybe they had one of the reasons Carl mentioned. Even if your messages were intended to increase friendliness to new users, they had the opposite effect due to how confrontational they were. I know if I were a new user asking a question here I'd be a lot more scared off by your argumentative messages than a simple "Please include your command" sentence. My 2¢, Tom ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
Am 03.02.23 um 19:59 schrieb Dave Blanchard: On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 19:45:56 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: but to be honest: a subject like "FW: New user question" implies common sense isn't present with common sense the subject would have been "Unknown encoder 'hap'" Free clue: there is no such thing as "common sense." there is Not everyone possesses the exact same knowledge and experience. which knowledge do you need to write a useful subject? "New users" in particular aren't exactly known for their deep, intricate knowledge of mailing list/forum etiquette, or how to construct a good subject line. a working brain is a enough to put the question into the subject instead "New user question" and has nothing to do with a mailing list at all Maybe you haven't been around the internet long enough to have noticed this trend, which I picked up on back in the 90s. even in the 90s people where able to write their topic in the subject It seems the focus of many members of this group isn't on actually *helping people*, but on policing nonsense "rules violations" or finding some way they can call the user an idiot. with "No, I haven't. I don't have time to familiarize myself with the 6,282,928 special snowflake unique rule systems" you making yourself an idiot ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 19:45:56 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > but to be honest: a subject like "FW: New user question" implies common > sense isn't present > > with common sense the subject would have been "Unknown encoder 'hap'" Free clue: there is no such thing as "common sense." Not everyone possesses the exact same knowledge and experience. "New users" in particular aren't exactly known for their deep, intricate knowledge of mailing list/forum etiquette, or how to construct a good subject line. Maybe you haven't been around the internet long enough to have noticed this trend, which I picked up on back in the 90s. It seems the focus of many members of this group isn't on actually *helping people*, but on policing nonsense "rules violations" or finding some way they can call the user an idiot. Dave ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
Am 03.02.23 um 19:42 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 03.02.23 um 19:26 schrieb Dave Blanchard: No, I haven't. I don't have time to familiarize myself with the 6,282,928 special snowflake unique rule systems that every special snowflake community on the planet expects everyone to memorize and be intimately familiar with at all times. No one else does, either, whether they're honest enough to admit it or not http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise applies everywhere and common sense could tell you too but to be honest: a subject like "FW: New user question" implies common sense isn't present with common sense the subject would have been "Unknown encoder 'hap'" ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
Am 03.02.23 um 19:26 schrieb Dave Blanchard: No, I haven't. I don't have time to familiarize myself with the 6,282,928 special snowflake unique rule systems that every special snowflake community on the planet expects everyone to memorize and be intimately familiar with at all times. No one else does, either, whether they're honest enough to admit it or not http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise applies everywhere and common sense could tell you too ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:07:32 + Carl Zwanzig wrote: > On 2/3/2023 9:22 AM, Dave Blanchard wrote: > > And how would that help this situation in any way? > In this one particular case, maybe not, but we don't necessary know. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that we do. > So, why include that? > Because it would contain the build info, which may be relevant. In this case, not so much, since it's quite clear what's happening from the error output. Not much ambiguity there. > Because it contains info about the input and output streams. Which is again, irrelevant. > Because the list FAQ (you have read it, haven't you?) asks for it. No, I haven't. I don't have time to familiarize myself with the 6,282,928 special snowflake unique rule systems that every special snowflake community on the planet expects everyone to memorize and be intimately familiar with at all times. No one else does, either, whether they're honest enough to admit it or not. Hell, the average American commits at least three felonies a day, every day, without even realizing it. Have you read the entire text of the U.S. legal code, citizen? No? You criminal. I tried to pay you a compliment, Carl, but I guess you just don't know how to take one. Dave ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
On 2/3/2023 9:22 AM, Dave Blanchard wrote: And how would that help this situation in any way? In this one particular case, maybe not, but we don't necessary know. So, why include that? Because it would contain the build info, which may be relevant. Because it contains info about the input and output streams. Because the list FAQ (you have read it, haven't you?) asks for it. There is seldom a reason you leave out the complete command and output; most of us would rather see it than have to ask, and more often than not it is needed. z! ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 12:23:18 -0800 Patrick Cusack via ffmpeg-user wrote: > Please include your command that you use for conversion as well as all the > output. And how would that help this situation in any way? Thanks to Carl for actually answering the question. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user question
> This is my first time using FFMPEG. We are trying to use it to convert media > files to HAP. I loaded the latest version, but when we try to transcode a > file, it returns " Unknown encoder 'hap' ". How do I load the hap encoder to > the system? Please include your command that you use for conversion as well as all the output. Patrick ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
