Re: [FFmpeg-user] Default output fps vs fps filter @ 30fps

2019-10-20 Thread Hans Carlson

On Sun, 20 Oct 2019, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:


Am 20.10.2019 um 23:05 schrieb Hans Carlson :

Is there any advantage (or disadvantage) to using the fps filter vs the 
-r option in this particular case?


The main difference between the fps filter and the constant frame rate 
output that can be forced by the command line utility is that the filter 
is less verbose. The algorithms are not equally greedy but it is likely 
that this makes little or no difference for your use case.


Ah, so the fps filter *could* display the same/similar kind of "frames 
duplicated" messages, it just doesn't.  Thanks Carl, that's kind of what I 
suspected.


PS. I do realize there may be instances (eg. different codecs and/or 
increasing fps) where the filter vs -r option could make more of a 
difference.  But in this instance, as you say, probably nothing noticeable.

___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Default output fps vs fps filter @ 30fps

2019-10-20 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos


> Am 20.10.2019 um 23:05 schrieb Hans Carlson :
> 
> Is there any advantage (or disadvantage) to using the fps filter vs the -r 
> option in this particular case?

The main difference between the fps filter and the constant frame rate output 
that can be forced by the command line utility is that the filter is less 
verbose.
The algorithms are not equally greedy but it is likely that this makes little 
or no difference for your use case.

Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".