[filmscanners] Re: new Nikon scanners
If you are in the UK I think it is about £400. On 4/2/04 4:19 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just curious, where did you get the repair quote from? My Sprintscan 120's dead I can't even get Polaroid to answer my e-mails about where the nearest repair deopt is. (and, of course, how much did they quote you?) Jim Levitt wrote: My Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 has just died on me. The repair charges are not cost effective. I will need a replacement. Does anyone have hands-on experience with the new Nikon 5000 scanner? Does it output clearly superior scans to those produced by the Polaroid (or equivalent Microtek?). I realize the Nikon has infrared cleaning capabilities that are lacking in the Polaroid. Have the Nikon scanners been mechanically reliable, in general? My Polaroid always sounded like a coffee grinder, and died despite rather light use. Thanks for any advice. -- -- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
[filmscanners] Re: Polaroid sprintscan 120
Hi Craig, As far as I know, Polaroid themselves still offer support on the 120. I too have one and spoke with their support people about 2 months ago and as of then they were still offering support. http://www.polaroid.com/company_info/ww_detail.jsp?PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=84552 4441760210FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=2534374302023845bmUID=1066672092336PRDREG =null Above is the URL for the UK tech support, with contact numbers. Hope this is of some help. Regards Eric On 20/10/03 17:17, Craig Auckand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I have a Polaroid sprintscan 120; it must be about 2 years old. It has had quite constant use during that time - perhaps being operated 2-3 times a week. Last week it developed a dark line/patch running the length of the frame. This is most noticeable in blue skies; I rescanned some earlier work to check the difference and it not present on those but appears on any new scans. Can anyone suggest what this is? A carriage fault or bulb? And being in the UK can anyone suggest a service centre etc? Can these things be repaired? Thank in advance Craig -- -- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
[filmscanners] FS: Polaroid SprintScan 4000 (UK)
Hi, I have a mint Polaroid SprintScan 4000 for sale. I have upgraded to the SS 120. The SS 4000 is as new and is complete with two negative holders and one positive holder, SCSI cable, Binuscan, Pola Color Insight and Silverfast 5 complete with paid for upgrade to 6 ( for Mac ) and all documentation. Also included is the special cleaning brush, supplied by Polaroid. The only thing i don't have is the original box. 350 pounds uk or near offer I am in Liverpool UK and can demonstrate the scanner on a Mac G4. Please contact via [EMAIL PROTECTED] or phone 07761 534047 mobile. Thanks for looking Eric Calderwood Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
[filmscanners] Wanted Polaroid SS 120 Glass Film Holder in the UK
Can anyone in the UK please help. I am trying to purchase the Polaroid SS 120 Glass Negative carrier to enable me to scan Xpan negatives. I am still waiting for Polaroid UK to come through with one, and thought I would ask the group if anyone knows of one that might be for sale? If I end up with two then that is not a problem. Regards Eric (Liverpool UK) Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
[filmscanners] Re: vuescan problem
John: Ever since I started to scan color negatives with vuescan (on SS4000) I periodically get scans that differ greatly from the preview. Usually with a much narrower range of values and odd casts, often a bright, almost solarized blue cast in white highlights and more recently an overall green cast. This makes batch scanning impossible because somewhere in the strip the scans eventually start having these properties. I've encountered similar weirdness with Vuescan (don't remember the version number I'm on, but it's about 2 months old.) Usually only happens when batch scanning. Sometimes with BW, sometimes with color. Instead of getting a weird cast, I get an image that's totally unrecognizeable. Looks like the memory has been corrupted. I actually saw this doing a single scan for the time ever. I was scanning all the negatives on a particular strip, but scanning one at a time. I ejected the film carrier, and did a new preview and a new scan, and all was well. I'm using the SS4000, too, on WinNT with 256 meg of memory. I rarely scan all the negatives in a single strip, so it's not a huge deal to me. I'm guessing that memory is being corrupted somewhere. But ejecting the carrier and re-inserting it helps. Eric Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
[filmscanners] Re: VueScan multiple passes possibility
Tony: I don't share your enthusiasm for this, but if you really want it you can scan twice and combine in PS. That's called manual work. If it can be done in software with automatic alignment, why would I want to do this painstakingly and individually by hand? :) Eric Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
[filmscanners] Re: VueScan 7.5 beta 8 Available
Arthur: Even Ed has mentioned that you will not gain much, if anything from doing so. It's that little bit that I wouldn't mind gaining. :) I'm happy with incremental improvements. Anything that will help the image. Don't get me wrong. I'm extremely happy with what I can get from my SS4000 and Vuescan right now. It's wonderful. I just want more. Always. :) I don't mind doubling the scanning time for any kind of visible improvement. Eric Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
[filmscanners] Re: VueScan 7.5 beta 8 Available
Steve: Lets face it, memory is pretty cheap right now - and nerds like us scanner folks probably already have loads of it just so we can scan and manipulate images anyway :-) I'm in agreement. I have a Polaroid SprintScan 4000, and I'd love to be able to make multiple passes. Or even the long exposure pass. Eric Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
[filmscanners] Re: Polaroid Factory Service
Keith: Then I ran that brush through and it stuck. What brush? Did I miss something that came with mine? Eric Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
[filmscanners] Re: Sprintscan 4000 and Vuescan
Tom: I'm having a very strange problem when using Vuescan to batch scan slides on my Polaroid Sprintscan 4000. It ALWAYS scans slides 1 and 2 properly and NEVER scans slides 3 and 4 properly, the registration is always off by at least 1/2 of the 3rd slide and the scan of the 4th slide can be of an area from anywhere on the carrier. Has anyone else experienced this problem? If so how have you resolved it? Ed Hamrick has been trying to help but so far nothing has worked. I've noticed that before. I think for me, it did 1-3 fine and 4-5 were messed up like you describe. I tried to redo just 4 and same result. Shutdown and restarted Vuescan, and then it would do 4 and 5 fine by themselves. I rarely batchscan an entire strip anymore. Usually, I just want a picture or two, and I've had problems with dust sometimes lately. So my work flow is to scan a single image, bring it into Photoshop, verify there aren't any dust lines running the length of the carrier, and then go on to the next one. But you aren't alone. :) Eric Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
[filmscanners] OT: problems installing SCSI card
I'm trying to install an Adaptec 2906 card in my Gateway desktop and getting a monitor/video card conflict. When the card installed, the monitor won't come on when I boot up. I've tried booting with the scanner attached (Sprintscan400) and with nothing attached; same result both time. When I pull the card, everything goes back to normal. My system is a little more than 2 years old; running Win98SE with a flatscreen monitor and an ATI LCD Panel VideoCard Rev0. Device manager shows one (and only one) IRQ channel free: 14. Adaptec tech suggested booting without the scanner, but that didn't work. His next suggestion was to try reordering PCI cards on the motherboard. I'm wary of that. Hoping someone here has some guidance, on- or off-list. Thanks Eric Etheridge Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
filmscanners: Rescans and archiving
I have a question for the group. I recently upgraded from a original Photosmart scanner for 35mm film to a Nikon LS-IV scanner. I recently scanned about 100-200 images from a trip and then changed scanners and monitors. The Photosmart was 2400DPI scanner and teh Nikon was a 2900DPI scanner. This past weekend I opened up some of the old scanned images and was looking at them and noticed that there is a big difference in the scans compared to new scans I have done with the Nikon scanner. Question is.. IT is worth my time to rescan all those images again It will take some time to do since I will have to fish them out again. Secondly, I have been burning my finished scans onto Verbatim CD-R discs. But I have read and been recommended recently that the Kodak Ultima CD-R 80 are better for long term storage. Does anyone have a opinion on this? Thanks Eric == Dare I say it, but the mistake here might be the belief that a 4000dpi scanner is actually capable of 4000dpi scans (or samples per inch, if we want to reduce confusion). Anyone got any hard evidence of the *actual* resolving power of these scanners? Objectively measured? No. AIUI it's pretty hard (ie expensive) to achieve, as conventional test target images don't work properly with digital systems. In any case, I am more interested in real-life use :) Empirically, yes - I have scanned several ISO100 originals on both 2,700ppi and 4,000 ppi scanners. There is a difference, which is somewhat analogous to that between fast and fine-grain film but without the grain! At the same time it's obvious but subtle. The 4000ppi scans show better tonal smoothness and inner detail, though only look marginally sharper. Printed on the same Epson 1200, both are perfectly acceptable, especially in terms of sharpness, but the 4000 scan looks somehow smoother and clearer, whilst the 2700 appears almost slightly smeared or veiled. But you'd only really notice this in a side-by-side comparison. After carrying out this test, I concluded I wouldn't be bothering to rescan all the stuff I had done at 2700, apart from a few originals which had produced massive grain aliasing problems. 4000ppi is very much less sensitive to that. I suspect the Nikon mentioned was having a bad focus day. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film scanner info comparisons
filmscanners: New Version of Nikon Scan December 20th
Update November 30, 2001 Download Service for the XP compliant versions of Nikon Scan 3, NikonView 4 and Nikon Capture 2 are planned to begin On December 20th, 2001 http://www.nikontechusa.com/XP.htm
filmscanners: Vuescan website
Ed, Is there a problem accessing your webiste to download Vuescan? I cannot seem to get it to come up on my browser.. Thanks Eric
Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan 3.1.1 update
there is no version 3.1.1 listed on the website... only 3.1 - Original Message - From: Mikael Risedal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 6:50 AM Subject: filmscanners: Nikonscan 3.1.1 update There is a new Nikonscan 3.1.1 out today go to nikon homepage Mikael Risedal _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS40ED - first impressions
sorry about that did not remember the website address.. the site also has a firmware upgrade for the scanner also... = - Original Message - From: Mark Otway [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:10 AM Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon LS40ED - first impressions well first of all if you want they have a bug fix version of Nikon Scan Version 3.1 on their website.. I think the address is www.nikon-imaging.com Thanks. I couldn't access that URL for some reason, but found 3.1 at http://www.nikontechusa.com. I also notice that on that site it mentions that Nikon Scan 3.1 does not support Windows XP. However, they also claim that an XP-compatible version of Nikon Scan is coming out before the end of Nobember (free download).
Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS40ED - first impressions
Hiya Mark, well first of all if you want they have a bug fix version of Nikon Scan Version 3.1 on their website.. I think the address is www.nikon-imaging.com I got my Nikon Coolscan LS-IV yesterday but have not installed it yet since I have a small problem with my video card or something... Eric == Well, I finally got around to picking up my Nikon Coolscan LS40ED this afternoon, and I'm very pleased with it. A surprisingly small machine (despite the *huge* cardboard box it came in!), it's produced some superb results so far. Installation was very easy - I plugged in the USB cable and XP immediately recognised it correctly and installed a driver. I installed Nikon Scan 3, and have already done a few decent scans. I particularly like the batch-scanning feature - just slipping a film strip in and letting the scanner do the rest (just what I wanted). A couple of questions: 1. For some reason the batch scanning facility defaults to assuming that each strip has 6 pictures on it. That's fine, except that some of mine don't - and it generates an error for the 'missing' pics. A minor annoyance, but not the end of the world. 2. Is VueScan going to be a better option for scanning than Nikon Scan 3? What's the batch scanning handling like? Small questions, but all in all I'm very pleased so far. :-)
Re: filmscanners: VueScan Another dumb question.
Bill , Fantastic , the Mac OS 9.2:Photos works perfectly. Thanks again Bill All the Best Eric Eric-- Try Mac OS 9.2:Photos or Mac OS 9.2/Photos Note the : vs the / used to join the folder name to the hard disk name. --Bill At 3:47 PM + 10-11-01, Eric Calderwood wrote: Hi, Another dumb question . What do I type into the default folder , for where the scans are to be sent on a Mac running OS 9.2.1 ? If I type in Mac OS 9.2 ( the name of my primary HD ,into the Default Folder box ) then VueScan outputs to there ok. However I have a folder in there called unsurprisingly Photos and I won't to save the scans in this. Can any Mac experts tell me how to do this ? Regards Eric
filmscanners: VueScan Another dumb question.
Hi, Another dumb question . What do I type into the default folder , for where the scans are to be sent on a Mac running OS 9.2.1 ? If I type in Mac OS 9.2 ( the name of my primary HD ,into the Default Folder box ) then VueScan outputs to there ok. However I have a folder in there called unsurprisingly Photos and I won't to save the scans in this. Can any Mac experts tell me how to do this ? Regards Eric
Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikon LS4000ED inquiry + Mac OS 9.x Fixed
Bill , I've finally sorted what it was ( I must be stupid ) , I tried VueScan with all periphs powered up ( and all Nikon extensions disabled ) . VueScan saw the Umax ok but not the Nikon . I then put one of the adapters into the Nikon and Bingo all ok. Have re-tried with just the Nikon powered up ( with an adapter inserted ) and also all ok. Thanks to all who tried to help. Boy am I glad to get this fixed . Best Regards Eric Bill, Thanks for your help , but Still no joy. VueScan still freezes on launch. There is a flash of the cursor after getting the splash screen then it seizes up and a re-boot is required. System isMac G4 400 2 Gb Ram ( just upgraded again ) 10 Gb hard drive with OS 10.1 20 Gb hard drive with OS 9.2.1 Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 900u monitor Epson Stylus Photo 1290 printer Nikon Super Coolscan 4000 ED firewire scanner Umax Astra 1200S SCSI flatbed scanner Plextor PleXWriter 12/10/32 SCSI external Yamaha speakers Wacom A5 USB Graphics tablet USB hub ( powered ) Std keyboard and mouse ( both USB ) I have tried with the Nikon extensions disabled , Nikon and Umax extensions disabled , Nikon Umax and Wacom extensions disabled . Also when I try ,the Umax and Plextor are not even powered up. Can anyone help ? Please Eric Eric-- Assuming you're using Mac OS 8.x to 9.x, remove the following files from the Extensions folder that's in your System folder, then restart your Mac: Nikon LS4K Family Nikon LS4K Expert Nikon LS4K Driver Nikon Common Driver If you later want to use NikonScan (either standalone or as a Photoshop plug-in) you have to copy these files back into the Extensions folder and restart your Mac again. --Bill At 10:36 AM + 4-11-01, Eric Calderwood wrote: How did you get VueScan to recognise the Nikon 4000 ED ? I am still having difficulties.
Re: filmscanners: Slide scanner question.
I know about conflicting answers ... currently I have Photosmart that seems to work ok, but not good on sunset and a bit dark images.. subject in the slides So I have a question for you to ponder. I am looking for a new scanner and have narrowed it down to three options. they are . Nikon LS IV 2900DPI with Digital ICE, ROC and Gem software approx $750.00 http://www.imaging-resource.com/SCAN/CSIV/C4A.HTM Nikon Supercoolscan 2000 2700 DPI with ICE, ROC and GEM software multipass scanning approx. $750.00 http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/LS2K/LS2KA.HTM Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 multipass scanning and higher resolution and silverfast software around $699.00 with a $200.00 rebate http://www.imaging-resource.com/SCAN/SS4000/SS40A.HTM any thoughts? not going to print them, yet, just scan and post on web and other things... === Hi Eric; You're going to get conflicting answers from different folks on this list. I have the SS4000 and love it and I wouldn't consider the other two for my purposes. If you think you may want to crop your images and you want to be able to make the largest prints you can out of the resulting file, you will want the most resolution you can get. Every thing else being equal, 4000 dpi beats 2700 dpi for file size every time. You no doubt know that Polaroid has filed chapter 11. You have to make your own judgement relative to that. I've had my SS4000 for a year and a half and made hundreds of scans with great results and no problems. For me, ICE is a non issue because with the SS4000, I wouldn't use it if I had it. If you have scratched slides or work in a dusty environment, you experience might be different. Oh yes, I sell fine art nature and wild life prints so I'm a little fussy. Regards, Ron Carlson - Original Message - From: Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 12:48 PM Subject: filmscanners: Slide scanner question. hiya there, I have a quick question for the group here. I am looking for a new slide scanner.. Right now I have a Photosmart scanner with Vuescan software and it works ok, but with tough slides or dark slides they don't scan quite that well. I have been looking at three different scanners. Nikon LS IV Coolscan Nikon Supercoolscan 2000 Polaroid sprint scan 4000 I know someone who has the LS 2000 Scanner and loves it, and I can get one for around $750.00 new . I also have heard about the Polaroid scanner and the 200 rebate they are offering.. Does anyone know about the Nikon LS IV coolscan and a comparison between the three of them? I know some of the specs. of all of them, but what is the best one overall? Thanks Eric
filmscanners: Slide scanner question.
hiya there, I have a quick question for the group here. I am looking for a new slide scanner.. Right now I have a Photosmart scanner with Vuescan software and it works ok, but with tough slides or dark slides they don't scan quite that well. I have been looking at three different scanners. Nikon LS IV Coolscan Nikon Supercoolscan 2000 Polaroid sprint scan 4000 I know someone who has the LS 2000 Scanner and loves it, and I can get one for around $750.00 new . I also have heard about the Polaroid scanner and the 200 rebate they are offering.. Does anyone know about the Nikon LS IV coolscan and a comparison between the three of them? I know some of the specs. of all of them, but what is the best one overall? Thanks Eric
Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikon LS4000ED inquiry + Mac OS 9.x
Bill , How did you get VueScan to recognise the Nikon 4000 ED ? I am still having difficulties. Eric At 8:49 AM +1000 3-11-01, Rob Geraghty wrote: Bill Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: o You have to decide whether or not to use ICE and/or GEM BEFORE you scan... Have you tried Vuescan? With Vuescan you could save raw files and recrop later without rescanning. BF: I've just gotten the new Vuescan to recognize the scanner and am looking forward to trying this. o It also comes with a motorized filmstrip adapterIn practice however it is cranky, inconvenient, and frustrating. This comment really surprises me. I've scanned many rolls of film using the filmstrip adapter with my LS30... BF: I think that it will turn out to be a good thing for making moderate quality batch scans, but I'm finding that to get the most out of my images I have to hand tune the settings for each image, and in this type of workflow the motorized filmstrip adapter makes me angry when I use it. Part of this has to do with the stupid and inconvenient way the software handles the making of thumbnail previews, part of this has to do with the stupid and clunky way it handles adjusting the framing, part of this has to do with the stupid and time-consuming way it wants to throw out the thumbnails and recreate them after every scan, and dang it-- part of this has to do with the hardware not having an eject button! To put it bluntly I FEEL like the software and hardware were specially designed to balk me at every turn X-(. It makes me mad. --Bill
Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikon LS4000ED inquiry + Mac OS 9.x
Bill, Thanks for your help , but Still no joy. VueScan still freezes on launch. There is a flash of the cursor after getting the splash screen then it seizes up and a re-boot is required. System isMac G4 400 2 Gb Ram ( just upgraded again ) 10 Gb hard drive with OS 10.1 20 Gb hard drive with OS 9.2.1 Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 900u monitor Epson Stylus Photo 1290 printer Nikon Super Coolscan 4000 ED firewire scanner Umax Astra 1200S SCSI flatbed scanner Plextor PleXWriter 12/10/32 SCSI external Yamaha speakers Wacom A5 USB Graphics tablet USB hub ( powered ) Std keyboard and mouse ( both USB ) I have tried with the Nikon extensions disabled , Nikon and Umax extensions disabled , Nikon Umax and Wacom extensions disabled . Also when I try ,the Umax and Plextor are not even powered up. Can anyone help ? Please Eric Eric-- Assuming you're using Mac OS 8.x to 9.x, remove the following files from the Extensions folder that's in your System folder, then restart your Mac: Nikon LS4K Family Nikon LS4K Expert Nikon LS4K Driver Nikon Common Driver If you later want to use NikonScan (either standalone or as a Photoshop plug-in) you have to copy these files back into the Extensions folder and restart your Mac again. --Bill At 10:36 AM + 4-11-01, Eric Calderwood wrote: How did you get VueScan to recognise the Nikon 4000 ED ? I am still having difficulties.
Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikon LS4000ED inquiry + Mac OS 9.x Fixed
Bill , I've finally sorted what it was ( I must be stupid ) , I tried VueScan with all periphs powered up ( and all Nikon extensions disabled ) . VueScan saw the Umax ok but not the Nikon . I then put one of the adapters into the Nikon and Bingo all ok. Have re-tried with just the Nikon powered up ( with an adapter inserted ) and also all ok. Thanks to all who tried to help. Boy am I glad to get this fixed . Best Regards Eric Bill, Thanks for your help , but Still no joy. VueScan still freezes on launch. There is a flash of the cursor after getting the splash screen then it seizes up and a re-boot is required. System isMac G4 400 2 Gb Ram ( just upgraded again ) 10 Gb hard drive with OS 10.1 20 Gb hard drive with OS 9.2.1 Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 900u monitor Epson Stylus Photo 1290 printer Nikon Super Coolscan 4000 ED firewire scanner Umax Astra 1200S SCSI flatbed scanner Plextor PleXWriter 12/10/32 SCSI external Yamaha speakers Wacom A5 USB Graphics tablet USB hub ( powered ) Std keyboard and mouse ( both USB ) I have tried with the Nikon extensions disabled , Nikon and Umax extensions disabled , Nikon Umax and Wacom extensions disabled . Also when I try ,the Umax and Plextor are not even powered up. Can anyone help ? Please Eric Eric-- Assuming you're using Mac OS 8.x to 9.x, remove the following files from the Extensions folder that's in your System folder, then restart your Mac: Nikon LS4K Family Nikon LS4K Expert Nikon LS4K Driver Nikon Common Driver If you later want to use NikonScan (either standalone or as a Photoshop plug-in) you have to copy these files back into the Extensions folder and restart your Mac again. --Bill At 10:36 AM + 4-11-01, Eric Calderwood wrote: How did you get VueScan to recognise the Nikon 4000 ED ? I am still having difficulties.
filmscanners: VueScan and Mac OS 9.x
Hello , Has anyone out there managed to get VueScan 7.1.25 ( or 7.1.26 ) working with the Nikon 4000 ED ? Ed has been very helpful , but i still cannot get VueScan running. If i leave the Nikon extensions in then VueScan does not even see the Nikon scanner , and if i disable the Nikon extensions then the Mac freezes when i launch VueScan. If i remove just the Nikon 4k extensions then the Mac will not finish booting and locks up , forcing a reset with the button the front with the Nikon powered off. Can anyone help please ? PS If any replies off list please send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] so I can receive them at home , where the scanner is. Best Regards Eric
filmscanners: Minolta Scan Dual ICC Profile
Hi, I'd like to ask whether anyone has come across or created an ICC profile for the Minolta Scan Dual (not Dual II) and would be willing to share it. Thanks, Eric Santucci Get 250 color business cards for FREE! http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/
filmscanners: Minolta Scan Dual ICC Profile
Hi, I'd like to ask whether anyone has come across or created an ICC profile for the Minolta Scan Dual (not Dual II) and would be willing to share it. Thanks, Eric Santucci Get 250 color business cards for FREE! http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/
