Re: [Finale] clef change and beaming

2011-02-05 Thread Florence + Michael
If it's possible, make the clef change where a beam already breaks, between two 
beats or between two phrases. If extremes of range force you to put a clef 
change in the middle of a beamed group, don't break the beam: it's important to 
show that the rhythmic grouping continues. If you break the beam, it could look 
as if a break in phrasing is desired.

A beam broken in the wrong place can also hamper sight-reading, particularly 
if there are groups of very short values: if I'm playing passages in 32nd notes 
I want to see how they fall into beats.

Michael

On 4 Feb 2011, at 20:50, dc wrote:

 Does it make sense to break a beam after a clef change? Someone suggested 
 this for a better legibility, and I see the point, but don't know if is 
 permissible or not.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Dennis


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] clef change and beaming

2011-02-05 Thread John Howell

At 9:54 AM +0100 2/5/11, Florence + Michael wrote:
If it's possible, make the clef change where a beam already breaks, 
between two beats or between two phrases. If extremes of range force 
you to put a clef change in the middle of a beamed group, don't 
break the beam: it's important to show that the rhythmic grouping 
continues. If you break the beam, it could look as if a break in 
phrasing is desired.


Ah, but sometimes a break in phrasing IS desired.  It's pretty common 
in baroque music for a given instrument to be outlining two separate, 
contrapuntal parts simultaneously, say a soprano and alto harmony or 
pedal point, or even a soprano and bass line with larger leaps.  Many 
modern players don't play it that way, making it all linear, but it's 
there all the same.  And it's the larger leaps that should trigger a 
clef change, if indeed one is actually needed.  I am strongly opposed 
to gratuitous clef changes just to make the page look prettier!  It 
impedes sightreading.  If it's really needed, of course, that's 
different.


I wish we could see an example of the original passage.

John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts  Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

We never play anything the same way once.  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] clef change and beaming

2011-02-05 Thread Florence + Michael
Well, yes, that corresponds to what I said: if it's possible, make the clef 
change where a beam already breaks, between two beats or between two phrases: 
if the phrasing already dictates a beam break, by all means put the clef change 
there. But if no break in phrasing is desired, it's a mistake to break a beamed 
group with a clef change. 

Michael


On 5 Feb 2011, at 19:27, John Howell wrote:

 At 9:54 AM +0100 2/5/11, Florence + Michael wrote:
 If it's possible, make the clef change where a beam already breaks, between 
 two beats or between two phrases. If extremes of range force you to put a 
 clef change in the middle of a beamed group, don't break the beam: it's 
 important to show that the rhythmic grouping continues. If you break the 
 beam, it could look as if a break in phrasing is desired.
 
 Ah, but sometimes a break in phrasing IS desired.  It's pretty common in 
 baroque music for a given instrument to be outlining two separate, 
 contrapuntal parts simultaneously, say a soprano and alto harmony or pedal 
 point, or even a soprano and bass line with larger leaps.  Many modern 
 players don't play it that way, making it all linear, but it's there all the 
 same.  And it's the larger leaps that should trigger a clef change, if indeed 
 one is actually needed.  I am strongly opposed to gratuitous clef changes 
 just to make the page look prettier!  It impedes sightreading.  If it's 
 really needed, of course, that's different.
 
 I wish we could see an example of the original passage.
 
 John
 
 
 -- 
 John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
 Virginia Tech Department of Music
 College of Liberal Arts  Human Sciences
 Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
 Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
 (mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
 http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html
 
 We never play anything the same way once.  Shelly Manne's definition
 of jazz musicians.
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Playback oddities

2011-02-05 Thread Matthew Hindson (gmail)

I wonder if anyone else has encountered this and found a solution?

There a part in a piece that (1) plays a mordent and a turn on a note 
where there is none, and (2) slows down immensely on the start of a bar 
for about 1/16th note and then goes back to normal.


I have tried using JW Tempo to force the slowdown not to occur on the 
start of the (2) problem, but to no avail.  There is no inordinate 
number of notes at either point, no hidden (or visible) expressions or 
articulations.


Thanks for any help anyone can give to this annoying problem.

Matthew
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Playback oddities

2011-02-05 Thread Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre
Sounds very much like you have chosen Baroque as Human Playback Preference 
within the Playback Controls window.

Klaus




From: Matthew Hindson (gmail) mhindson2...@gmail.com
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Sun, February 6, 2011 2:52:38 AM
Subject: [Finale] Playback oddities

I wonder if anyone else has encountered this and found a solution?

There a part in a piece that (1) plays a mordent and a turn on a note where 
there is none, and (2) slows down immensely on the start of a bar for about 
1/16th note and then goes back to normal.

I have tried using JW Tempo to force the slowdown not to occur on the start of 
the (2) problem, but to no avail.  There is no inordinate number of notes at 
either point, no hidden (or visible) expressions or articulations.

Thanks for any help anyone can give to this annoying problem.

Matthew
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



  
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale