[Finale] MuseGraph - Make a font!

2012-04-19 Thread Jari Williamsson
FYI, this is a freeware font project from MuseScore (=Georges, who 
created the excellent music fonts Vienna, Stockholm, Olslo, etc.)

http://www.musegraph.com/2012/04/17/make-a-font/


Best regards,

Jari Williamsson

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Awkward key signature menu

2012-04-19 Thread John Howell
At 4:12 PM +0100 4/19/12, Steve Parker wrote:
>'Melodic minor' is neither a key nor a mode. It 
>is a melodic or harmonic choice within a minor 
>key (or momentary minor key).


Which is to say that it's a variation of the 
natural minor scale (also known as Glarean's 
Aeolian mode).  And so is the harmonic minor, of 
course.  But what matters to a performer (at 
least to a string player) is the scale fingering, 
so for us there really ARE three choices, 
whatever labels you care to hang on them.  And 
rather few common practice period works actually 
USE the natural minor because of a desire to hear 
those silly leading tones.

John


-- 
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
School of Performing Arts & Cinema
College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences
290 College Ave., Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

"Machen Sie es, wie Sie wollen, machen Sie es nur schön."
(Do it as you like, just make it beautiful!)  --Johannes Brahms

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Awkward key signature menu

2012-04-19 Thread Steve Parker
'Melodic minor' is neither a key nor a mode. It is a melodic or harmonic choice 
within a minor key (or momentary minor key).

Steve P.

On 19 Apr 2012, at 14:13, bill sinclair wrote:

> You could set up up a "non-standard" key signature for melodic minor, 
> for
> instance for G melodic minor, use F#, and B flat.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] awkward key signature menu (correction)

2012-04-19 Thread John Howell
At 9:29 AM -0400 4/19/12, bill sinclair wrote:
>Actually, for G harmonic minor you would use B flat and F sharp.
>For melodic minor, you would use just E flat,
>and for the "natural" minor, use B and E flat.
>
>When you say G minor, there is a lot of ambiguity, since there are 3
>possible choices.
>That's why I think it's better NOT to give it a name.


Actually for melodic minor you use E natural and 
F# ascending, F natural and Eb descending.  And 
yes, the ambiguity is what makes minor keys more 
interesting and "richer" than major keys--which 
baroque composers certainly knew perfectly well.

Plus, of course, they often notated minor keys 
with one less flat that we now consider "proper," 
since the tradition was to treat them as 
transposed Dorian mode.  So they actually added 
MORE accidentals than we would.  But for playing 
in notes, G minor definitely needs both Eb and F# 
available, and not D# or Gb as defaults.

John


-- 
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
School of Performing Arts & Cinema
College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences
290 College Ave., Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

"Machen Sie es, wie Sie wollen, machen Sie es nur schön."
(Do it as you like, just make it beautiful!)  --Johannes Brahms

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Awkward key signature menu

2012-04-19 Thread Steve Parker
I would rather it made more distinctions.
I would like hitting the 9 key to change to the key and mode first without 
trying seven exotic options before an Eb major triad.
I would also like 'prefer flats' or 'prefer sharps' to be expanded to 'prefer G 
minor' etc. 

Steve P. 

On 18 Apr 2012, at 17:57, John Howell  wrote:

>> When you request a key signature, it makes a distinction between a
>> major key and a minor key with the exact same pattern of sharps and
>> flats. For example, they call C minor a DIFFERENT key signature than E
>> flat major.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] awkward key signature menu (correction)

2012-04-19 Thread Steve Parker
But there aren't three choices..
All three are identical in preferring Eb over D#, Bb over A# and F# over Gb. 
The order of likelihood of any spelling is the same. 

Steve P. 

On 19 Apr 2012, at 14:29, bill sinclair  wrote:

> Actually, for G harmonic minor you would use B flat and F sharp.
> For melodic minor, you would use just E flat,
> and for the "natural" minor, use B and E flat.
> 
> When you say G minor, there is a lot of ambiguity, since there are 3 
> possible choices.
> That's why I think it's better NOT to give it a name.
> 
> bill sinclair
> billsi...@aol.com
> 
> 
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] awkward key signature menu (correction)

2012-04-19 Thread bill sinclair
Actually, for G harmonic minor you would use B flat and F sharp.
For melodic minor, you would use just E flat,
and for the "natural" minor, use B and E flat.

When you say G minor, there is a lot of ambiguity, since there are 3 
possible choices.
That's why I think it's better NOT to give it a name.

bill sinclair
billsi...@aol.com


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] tuplets defined per staff

2012-04-19 Thread Robert Patterson
You probably need to mess with the bracket settings in Tuplet Mover. The
plugins attempts to maintain a constant bracket position relative to
numbers, but exactly how it looks depends on the combination of default
tuplet settings and TM bracket settings.

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Pierre Bailleul wrote:

> Hi all,
> I use your plug-in to set tuplets automatically over vocal music.
> I can adjust numbers (auto-position/stem-side distance but i can't move
> brackets with numbers which are frequently too closed with beams or
> accidentals. Do you know a way to do this (or if possible a picture capture
> of tuplet mover) ?
> Pierre
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Robert Patterson
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 2:18 PM
> To: finale@SHSU.EDU
> Subject: Re: [Finale] tuplets defined per staff
>
> My Tuplet Mover plugin can do this (with 2 passes). But you will have to
> turn off the "engraver tuplet" options for it work with them.
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Giovanni Andreani <
> i...@giovanniandreani.eu> wrote:
>
> > A very interesting feature, this would be! I haven't got this need at the
> > moment but would like to see if there is a solution too.
> >
> > Giovanni
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> > Giovanni Andreani
> >
> > www.giovanniandreani.eu
> >
> > >Hi list,
> > >I prefer to have tuplet brackets on the stem side, except for vocal
> music
> > >where I prefer to have them always above the staff in order to avoid
> > >lyrics. In the piano vocal score I'm working on now, is there a way to
> > >define tuplets in the vocal staff to automatically be placed above the
> > >staff but still have the piano staves place tuplets on the stem side?
> > >I know I can mass edit the tuplets with the selection tool, but it's
> > taking
> > >too many extra steps. A one-click setting would be ideal.
> > >This document is in Fin Mac 2010.
> > >Thanks
> > >Ryan
> > >___
> > >Finale mailing list
> > >Finale@shsu.edu
> > >http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Finale mailing list
> > Finale@shsu.edu
> > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> >
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] tuplets defined per staff

2012-04-19 Thread Pierre Bailleul
Hi all,
I use your plug-in to set tuplets automatically over vocal music.
I can adjust numbers (auto-position/stem-side distance but i can't move 
brackets with numbers which are frequently too closed with beams or 
accidentals. Do you know a way to do this (or if possible a picture capture 
of tuplet mover) ?
Pierre

-Message d'origine- 
From: Robert Patterson
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 2:18 PM
To: finale@SHSU.EDU
Subject: Re: [Finale] tuplets defined per staff

My Tuplet Mover plugin can do this (with 2 passes). But you will have to
turn off the "engraver tuplet" options for it work with them.

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Giovanni Andreani <
i...@giovanniandreani.eu> wrote:

> A very interesting feature, this would be! I haven't got this need at the
> moment but would like to see if there is a solution too.
>
> Giovanni
>
>
> 
>
> Giovanni Andreani
>
> www.giovanniandreani.eu
>
> >Hi list,
> >I prefer to have tuplet brackets on the stem side, except for vocal music
> >where I prefer to have them always above the staff in order to avoid
> >lyrics. In the piano vocal score I'm working on now, is there a way to
> >define tuplets in the vocal staff to automatically be placed above the
> >staff but still have the piano staves place tuplets on the stem side?
> >I know I can mass edit the tuplets with the selection tool, but it's
> taking
> >too many extra steps. A one-click setting would be ideal.
> >This document is in Fin Mac 2010.
> >Thanks
> >Ryan
> >___
> >Finale mailing list
> >Finale@shsu.edu
> >http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
>
>
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale 

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Quarter Tone Playback

2012-04-19 Thread eisenbeil

Hello All,
 
Regarding the "Is FINALE worth continuing?" thread, this list forum has been 
very helpful.  I am not a professional engraver orcopyist but I use Finale 
everyday and read these posts regularly.
 
I’m writing today because I would like to learn how to getFinale to play back 
quarter tones. I use Finale 2011 on a Mac, version 10.6.  A friend sent me a 
.mus file that display quarter tonenotation and when I open it, the file plays 
it back correctly.  I copied the quarter tone symbols (partof expression tools) 
into a string quartet I am composing but the quarter tonesdo not play back.  My 
score doesnot use a particular key signature.
 
Please let me know how I may correct this.  
 
With appreciation,
 
Bruce






 
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Awkward key signature menu

2012-04-19 Thread bill sinclair
I thought about the enharmonic spelling issue - -

You could set up up a "non-standard" key signature for melodic minor, 
for
instance for G melodic minor, use F#, and B flat.

That is the only place I can think of where major or minor might be 
treated differently.
But another way to handle it would be another box saying "major" or 
"minor."

bill sinclair
billsi...@aol.com


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-19 Thread Christopher Smith

On Thu Apr 19, at ThursdayApr 19 2:14 AM, dershem wrote:

> 
> The only option I would like that 2010 doesn't have is to hide staves in
> the piano part, and I am used to doing that with a T-square and x-acto
> knife.
> 
> Carl


Hi Carl,

I know that the piano group is set by default to NOT allow optimisation, but 
you can edit the group to allow optimisation normally in the part. This hasn't 
changed for a very long time. Now, of course, in 2012 it's called "hide empty 
staves" instead of "optimisation" but the principle (and the restriction!) are 
the same. Please, put down the knife!

Christopher

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] tuplets defined per staff

2012-04-19 Thread Robert Patterson
My Tuplet Mover plugin can do this (with 2 passes). But you will have to
turn off the "engraver tuplet" options for it work with them.

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Giovanni Andreani <
i...@giovanniandreani.eu> wrote:

> A very interesting feature, this would be! I haven't got this need at the
> moment but would like to see if there is a solution too.
>
> Giovanni
>
>
> 
>
> Giovanni Andreani
>
> www.giovanniandreani.eu
>
> >Hi list,
> >I prefer to have tuplet brackets on the stem side, except for vocal music
> >where I prefer to have them always above the staff in order to avoid
> >lyrics. In the piano vocal score I'm working on now, is there a way to
> >define tuplets in the vocal staff to automatically be placed above the
> >staff but still have the piano staves place tuplets on the stem side?
> >I know I can mass edit the tuplets with the selection tool, but it's
> taking
> >too many extra steps. A one-click setting would be ideal.
> >This document is in Fin Mac 2010.
> >Thanks
> >Ryan
> >___
> >Finale mailing list
> >Finale@shsu.edu
> >http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
>
>
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-19 Thread SN jef chippewa

>  >> "Extract Parts" would NOT save as [filename+partname+ whatevr] - I
>  >> had to manually name each part.
>
>There is a standard option for extracting parts, and it has been 
>there for many years.  It existed as a menu option but never worked.

i think i have extracted parts maybe once since the (admittedly 
faulty) implementation of linked parts (F2007), but just had a quick 
look at the dialogue in 2010.  what is the issue you are having 
exactly?  i just tried this and it seems to work fine.


>If it consistently does the wrong thing, it's a bug.  I could send 
>you files, but instead I will just revert to 2010, which works just 
>fine.

well, if there are such serious bugs as you mention they should also 
be checked and documented, and sent to MM.  i would encourage you to 
send the file to christopher for checking.


>The only option I would like that 2010 doesn't have is to hide 
>staves in the piano part, and I am used to doing that with a 
>T-square and x-acto knife.

hein?!?! once the system is optimized you can remove any staff by 
selecting the lower handle at the start of the staff (staff tool) and 
"deleting" it (from appearing in the system).  despite my own 
criticisms of the programme i have never come across something that 
could not be resolved somehow in the file itself.  knife and ruler... 
sheesh, sounds so... 1980s.  notation in the dark ages, barbaric =-O


>>It is just FULL of bugs and errors.  2010 works, 2012 does not - it 
>>takes more effort to do what 2010 did effortlessly.

could you list a few more of these bugs?

cheers,
jef

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-19 Thread Lawrence Yates
In 2012 is it now possible to add new instruments (like horn in D or horn
in E) to the instrument list so that you can use them in future projects?

Cheers,

Lawrence
-- 
Lawrenceyates.co.uk
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale