Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-14 Thread Randolph Peters
In the history of Finale updates, I can’t remember Finale putting out more than 
3 per version.

So, I’m guessing that the next iteration of Finale will have a new version 
number on it.

-Randolph Peters
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-14 Thread Dean Rosenthal
Maybe those comparisons of cars and Tvs were a bit over the top - although I'd 
like to know what your reasons are - you don't give any. 

About Adobe and other patches, from Apple and MS Operating systems, I've been 
using Macs for almost two decades and I can't think of a single update that has 
done anything other than IMPROVE functionality and increase security. But I 
know from reading the list of new features when I update that there are indeed 
some bug fixes, though they have always seemed completely obscure to me. Their 
updates have only, typically, improved performance and security. 

Nobody addressed Mathematica, which is probably the most comparative software. 
I have a transcription/composition/engraving client, a major client, who just 
does not understand bugs at all and you should try explaining to someone that 
you purchased an expensive product that has things that don't work - he comes 
from the rest of the marketplace, like cars, Tvs, heating systems, whatever, 
where if you sold a new product that had issues, you would just take it back - 
because it was obviously broken and no professional product wouldn't work 100%. 
He doesn't get it at all. It makes it really embarrassing to apologize and try 
explain this doesn't work properly, it's normal it's broken And it's really 
made me question why software is any different. You can't say the sophisticated 
engineering that goes into manufacturing an entire car isn't potentially as 
detailed as a software app - considering there is a lot of software right there 
in car, for example? 

Best,
Dean 

--
Dean Rosenthal
www.deanrosenthal.org



 On Oct 13, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Eric Dannewitz ericd...@jazz-sax.com wrote:
 
 Comparing software to a TV doesn't work. Or your car. Its ridiculous.
 
 Adobe's products are FAR from perfect and most of them have a list of legacy 
 bugs that would make Finale's look teeny weenie. And Adobe also does what 
 people are accusing MakeMusic of.moving on and fixing issues (or working 
 around them) in newer versions. Most all companies do that I think (Apple, 
 Microsoft, Google, etc). 
 
 
 On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Dean Rosenthal deanrosent...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 No. I don't understand why it's acceptable for a product to be sold with 
 enough bugs. Paying for a bug-fix release (one that would riddled with at 
 least some other issues) is not the answer. Imagine if you bought a 
 widescreen tv, only to find that certain features worked only some of the 
 time and some not at all, to compound this, your cable service also 
 presented programming issues and challenges. Or your car. Features as 
 prominent as a gauge. Or even a major program like Mathematica, which is at 
 least equally sophisticated in context to Finale. Or an Adobe product. Think 
 about what it would mean to the market and to advances and innovations. We 
 are stuck with a great application that is unfortunately far from perfect 
 and for some reason the company does not have high enough standards to 
 perfect their product the way the other products I've mentioned perfect 
 them. Comments?
 
 Dean
 
 --
 Dean Rosenthal
 www.deanrosenthal.org
 
 
 
 
 

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-14 Thread David H. Bailey
On 10/14/2014 1:16 PM, Dean Rosenthal wrote:
[snip]
 it's broken And it's really made me question why software is any
 different. You can't say the sophisticated engineering that goes into
 manufacturing an entire car isn't potentially as detailed as a
 software app - considering there is a lot of software right there in
 car, for example?
[snip]

But cars are buggy, too -- witness the numbers of recalls of millions of 
vehicles over the years.  Sometimes the bugs don't come out for a long 
long time in cars -- we owned a 2006 Saturn Ion which just received a 
recall notice (we traded it in 6 months ago).

And just as with software, car manufacturers try to hide the bugs as 
long as they can until they're finally caught.  Witness the millions of 
GM cars which had faulty ignition switches that we only found about 
within the past year, even though they had been installed *and known 
about at GM* quite a few years ago and GM said to go ahead and install 
them anyway!

It's the mindset of manufacturing these days, whether it's hardware or 
software -- put out a product that's a buggy as can be and still be 
sold, and then try to fix things when enough people complain about them 
and cry about how difficult it is to track them all down and fix them.

But that's because manufacturing, whether hardware or software, is all 
about pleasing the shareholders first and then pleasing the customers 
only as much as it helps to keep the shareholders happy.

If corporations put as much effort into fixing buggy products as they do 
into evading taxes, we'd all be much happier and not be complaining 
about the bugs nearly as much.

But that won't ever happen again in our lifetimes, not as long as Wall 
Street is king and the consumer is only a peasant with very little power.


-- 
David H. Bailey
dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
http://www.davidbaileymusicstudio.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-14 Thread Craig Parmerlee
David,

I generally agree with your comments on this subject.  But I really 
don't think this is a Wall Street play in this instance.  I think it is 
a case where Finale as an independent company could not find a business 
model that worked consistently.

It seems to me that this SHOULD have worked.  There are a lot of people 
who have minimal notation requirements, and they have always dabbled at 
the fringes (Rhapsody, Encore, etc)  For them, MuseScore is probably 
adequate.  So that does take a lot of buyers out of the potential 
market.  I would have thought the two biggest segments are churches 
(choir directors) and schools/universities.  Evidently neither Sibelius 
nor Finale was able to present a proposition to these segments that 
brought in enough revenue to fund continued support and development.  I 
would argue this is because they spread their efforts too thin and 
brought relatively little value to the market over the past 10 years. 
There is always a debate about what might have been.

That leaves the hard core users, who are professional or at least 
semi-professional copyists, songwriters, arrangers, show producers, 
sound track writers and so on.  Unfortunately this may be just too small 
a market to work.  We are loyal of necessity, mainly because there is no 
other alternative.  But it seems clear enough that Peaksware is 
interested only in milking the cash cow.  Had they the slightest 
interest in returning the product to a leading position, they would have 
presented some kind of vision to the market by now.

The good news, if there is any to be found, is that there is a very 
important segment that was overlooked by both Finale and Sibelius.  This 
is writers and producers who work primarily in the DAW space. That is a 
rapidly growing market. Their compositional workflow is quite different 
from the typical Finale workflow.  They compose intuitively and 
interactively.  But some of them have a need for notation.  It is just 
that notation is toward the end of their work flow whereas it is the 
beginning of the average Finale user's workflow.  And I believe that is 
the reason Steinberg has been willing to make a much bigger investment 
than Makemusic and Avid combined in the past 2 years.

My prediction is that we will never see another significant notation 
release (patches or new features) from Peaksware, although they are 
likely to push Smartmusic along.  If we do see a significant new release 
from Peaksware, I bet it will be within 9 months of the commercial 
introduction of the Steinberg product.



On 10/14/2014 2:57 PM, David H. Bailey wrote:

 But that won't ever happen again in our lifetimes, not as long as Wall
 Street is king and the consumer is only a peasant with very little power.



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-14 Thread Robert Patterson
I think this list is being entirely too pessimistic about prospects for
future Finale releases. I should let someone like Michael Good speak for
himself (or for Peaksware) but I believe some key developers from Finale
are making the move. That hardly seems like they are abandoning Finale.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: don't even begin to count on the
Steinberg release until there is an announced release date and feature set.
Bringing software to market faces many challenges that have nothing to do
with the quality of the tech team developing it. One the Steinberg product
faces is that it pretty much has to address every use case of Finale and
Sibelius that those two have evolved over twenty years. Yes, it will
potentially do some new innovative thing incredibly well, but v1.0 will
almost certainly fail at some other critical tasks that Fin/Sib handle with
aplomb, and that failure could be the deal breaker that kills the product.
(This is an oft-repeated tale in this industry.)

I agree with the comments about MuseScore. I also think you will see
MuseScore progressively steal away higher and higher level users over time.
MuseScore is a rapidly moving target with a major upgrade imminent.


On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Craig Parmerlee cr...@parmerlee.com
wrote:

 David,

 I generally agree with your comments on this subject.  But I really
 don't think this is a Wall Street play in this instance.  I think it is
 a case where Finale as an independent company could not find a business
 model that worked consistently.

 It seems to me that this SHOULD have worked.  There are a lot of people
 who have minimal notation requirements, and they have always dabbled at
 the fringes (Rhapsody, Encore, etc)  For them, MuseScore is probably
 adequate.  So that does take a lot of buyers out of the potential
 market.  I would have thought the two biggest segments are churches
 (choir directors) and schools/universities.  Evidently neither Sibelius
 nor Finale was able to present a proposition to these segments that
 brought in enough revenue to fund continued support and development.  I
 would argue this is because they spread their efforts too thin and
 brought relatively little value to the market over the past 10 years.
 There is always a debate about what might have been.

 That leaves the hard core users, who are professional or at least
 semi-professional copyists, songwriters, arrangers, show producers,
 sound track writers and so on.  Unfortunately this may be just too small
 a market to work.  We are loyal of necessity, mainly because there is no
 other alternative.  But it seems clear enough that Peaksware is
 interested only in milking the cash cow.  Had they the slightest
 interest in returning the product to a leading position, they would have
 presented some kind of vision to the market by now.

 The good news, if there is any to be found, is that there is a very
 important segment that was overlooked by both Finale and Sibelius.  This
 is writers and producers who work primarily in the DAW space. That is a
 rapidly growing market. Their compositional workflow is quite different
 from the typical Finale workflow.  They compose intuitively and
 interactively.  But some of them have a need for notation.  It is just
 that notation is toward the end of their work flow whereas it is the
 beginning of the average Finale user's workflow.  And I believe that is
 the reason Steinberg has been willing to make a much bigger investment
 than Makemusic and Avid combined in the past 2 years.

 My prediction is that we will never see another significant notation
 release (patches or new features) from Peaksware, although they are
 likely to push Smartmusic along.  If we do see a significant new release
 from Peaksware, I bet it will be within 9 months of the commercial
 introduction of the Steinberg product.



 On 10/14/2014 2:57 PM, David H. Bailey wrote:

  But that won't ever happen again in our lifetimes, not as long as Wall
  Street is king and the consumer is only a peasant with very little power.
 
 

 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-14 Thread Craig Parmerlee
As far as I know, he has made no such statements publicly other than the 
vague, bland non-denial the day they announced they were moving to 
Boulder.  Have you seen any?

I really would have thought that would be a priority, considering that 
the news was basically, We're firing the CEO, we're moving to Boulder, 
and maybe a few current employees will come along, and oh, by the way, 
we specialize in coaching software, which is a lot like music notation.

I would have though that with a few months to toss this around among 
themselves, maybe they would want to make a statement or two their 
customer base.


On 10/14/2014 4:23 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
 I should let someone like Michael Good speak for
 himself (or for Peaksware)

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


[Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Craig Parmerlee
I use F2014.  On balance, for me it does enough things better than 
earlier releases to justify staying on that level.  But just barely.  
The product is still riddled with bugs.  The most annoying ones for me 
are in Human Playback.  There are all sorts of cases where volumes get 
gut back to almost nothing, of voices go away entirely for several 
measures.  Staccatos are all over the map in their interpretation.  In 
fast passages some notes don't sound -- as if HP sands the note-off 
before the note-on.  None of these HP problems are seen in normal 
playback without HP.  Basically HP is a real mess.  I have opened 
tickets on specific items, but the staff always just blows them off as 
if I don't know what I'm talking about.

Given that Finale's exercise guru owners are moving the company to 
Boulder, and they were not known for putting out many fixes even before 
that, what are the odds that we will ever see any more fixes?
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread dershem
On 10/13/2014 7:21 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
 I use F2014.  On balance, for me it does enough things better than
 earlier releases to justify staying on that level.  But just barely.
 The product is still riddled with bugs.  The most annoying ones for me
 are in Human Playback.  There are all sorts of cases where volumes get
 gut back to almost nothing, of voices go away entirely for several
 measures.  Staccatos are all over the map in their interpretation.  In
 fast passages some notes don't sound -- as if HP sands the note-off
 before the note-on.  None of these HP problems are seen in normal
 playback without HP.  Basically HP is a real mess.  I have opened
 tickets on specific items, but the staff always just blows them off as
 if I don't know what I'm talking about.

 Given that Finale's exercise guru owners are moving the company to
 Boulder, and they were not known for putting out many fixes even before
 that, what are the odds that we will ever see any more fixes?

Given the dominance of bugs over actual fixes and improvements, I have 
stuck with F2010.  Every version since then has been so problem-ridden 
as to make it unusable.

cd
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Jan Angermüller
Am 13.10.2014 16:21, schrieb Craig Parmerlee:
 I have opened
 tickets on specific items, but the staff always just blows them off as
 if I don't know what I'm talking about.
Craig, I have seen the same with the MM staff and HP ... until I started
sending them screencam videos that capture the bug behaviour in realtime
and within the default document.
All the faulty behaviour was finally confirmed - also all the bugs that 
you mention.
For example, the note-off before note-on is described in detail in 
support case 140228-000408.

I also found it pretty frustrating that the MM support wasn't able
to understand some of the HP problems at first. And none of these issues
were fixed in the 2014 updates, although they were known months before.

Don't give up ... and keep on complaining about HP, hopefully HP will 
get better
in the next release.
If you need more info on HP bugs and the support cases, you can send a PM.

Jan
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Craig Parmerlee
On 10/13/2014 10:29 AM, dershem wrote:
 Given the dominance of bugs over actual fixes and improvements, I have
 stuck with F2010.  Every version since then has been so problem-ridden
 as to make it unusable.

Yes, I know many people have made that decision.  But my question is 
really more about what we should expect from this company in the future. 
  What I am really asking is whether anybody sees any reason to expect 
that anything will improve.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Raymond Horton
I work every note I can in win2012, go into 2014 only when absolutely
necessary, then rush  back home to 2012.
I hope the company gets its act together.
On Oct 13, 2014 11:05 AM, Craig Parmerlee cr...@parmerlee.com wrote:

 On 10/13/2014 10:29 AM, dershem wrote:
  Given the dominance of bugs over actual fixes and improvements, I have
  stuck with F2010.  Every version since then has been so problem-ridden
  as to make it unusable.

 Yes, I know many people have made that decision.  But my question is
 really more about what we should expect from this company in the future.
   What I am really asking is whether anybody sees any reason to expect
 that anything will improve.
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Robert Patterson
I would like to counter some of the negative comments. I never used Fin10,
but I think Fin12 is quite stable and I used it for a couple of years
without issues.

In the last couple of months I migrated to Fin14, and I have to say that,
despite the relative instability compared with Fin12 I am hooked. I love
the Keyless score feature and the changes to how smart shapes are assigned.
And the unlinkability of special tools means that I have finally arrived at
the holy grail of true linked parts for nearly all the projects I do, with
almost no need for compromise. (If only they had made accidental freezing,
parenthesizing, and movement unlinkable, then I really would not have to
compromise at all. Unlinkable vertical rest placement would be a big time
saver.)

To mitigate the instability I have shortened by autosave window to 5
minutes. It's not that big of a deal really, though I hope we get some
improvements without having to wait for a future upgrade.

Obviously, ymmv.


On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Raymond Horton horton.raym...@gmail.com
wrote:

 I work every note I can in win2012, go into 2014 only when absolutely
 necessary, then rush  back home to 2012.
 I hope the company gets its act together.
 On Oct 13, 2014 11:05 AM, Craig Parmerlee cr...@parmerlee.com wrote:

  On 10/13/2014 10:29 AM, dershem wrote:
   Given the dominance of bugs over actual fixes and improvements, I have
   stuck with F2010.  Every version since then has been so problem-ridden
   as to make it unusable.
 
  Yes, I know many people have made that decision.  But my question is
  really more about what we should expect from this company in the future.
What I am really asking is whether anybody sees any reason to expect
  that anything will improve.
  ___
  Finale mailing list
  Finale@shsu.edu
  https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
  To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
  finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Girard Bowe
Michael Good poked his head into our mailing list early last month, but
there's no clue if he heard the responses, so I have copied him on this
email. I would love to have a bug-fix release, and would pay for it.
Several people have requests for new features, but a lot of traffic on this
list concerns bugs. A number of users are using previous Finale versions due
to various issues.

Quote from Michael's email of 7/30:
As a general rule, I will never be able to offer dates or estimates for
future features, bug fixes, releases, or downloads.
What I can do is acknowledge the issue and work with my colleagues to create
ever better products in the future.

I, for one, don't need a better product - I just want the one I have to work
as it should. I would love to hear that someone in  MakeMusic takes our
concerns with bug-fixes seriously.

Here's a repost of my earlier email (a number of bug-fixes were requested in
response to this email):

Here's a few of my bugs, and a few wishes as well:

Chords become unchecked in the filter.
Articulation macro doesn't always work.
Selection tool is buggy. Shift-click doesn't always encompass selection.
In Speedy entry, can't always select the last note in the frame.
Spacebar-click doesn't always start playback. Finale must be restarted to
enable playback.
In JazzFont, the augmentation dot on a dotted-eighth rest is spaced too far
to the right.
Finale 2014 shuts down for no apparent reason.
Finale 2014 shuts down randomly when I use Transcribe! software.
There are a few Jazzfont characters which need reworking (eg, the Z looks
like a 2).
(I contacted Customer Support re: the shutdown issues, but nothing they
suggested worked.) Aria loading is painfully slow.

Not a bug, but. . .
Edit toolbar should be available (Save, Do/Undo, Print, etc). I REALLY miss
this!
Open most recent document should be an option for startup action.
It would be nice to have user-defined text inserts.
Adjust Jazzfont Chord Symbols to conform with Roemer-Brandt styling.

There are others who more serious issues than mine - I hope you all will
chime in!

I love the linked parts - that's been my favorite upgrade feature of recent
releases.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Dean Rosenthal
No. I don't understand why it's acceptable for a product to be sold with enough 
bugs. Paying for a bug-fix release (one that would riddled with at least some 
other issues) is not the answer. Imagine if you bought a widescreen tv, only to 
find that certain features worked only some of the time and some not at all, to 
compound this, your cable service also presented programming issues and 
challenges. Or your car. Features as prominent as a gauge. Or even a major 
program like Mathematica, which is at least equally sophisticated in context to 
Finale. Or an Adobe product. Think about what it would mean to the market and 
to advances and innovations. We are stuck with a great application that is 
unfortunately far from perfect and for some reason the company does not have 
high enough standards to perfect their product the way the other products I've 
mentioned perfect them. Comments?

Dean

--
Dean Rosenthal
www.deanrosenthal.org



 On Oct 13, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Girard Bowe girard.b...@verizon.net wrote:
 
 I would love to have a bug-fix release, and would pay for it.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Comparing software to a TV doesn't work. Or your car. Its ridiculous.

Adobe's products are FAR from perfect and most of them have a list of legacy 
bugs that would make Finale's look teeny weenie. And Adobe also does what 
people are accusing MakeMusic of.moving on and fixing issues (or working 
around them) in newer versions. Most all companies do that I think (Apple, 
Microsoft, Google, etc). 


On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Dean Rosenthal deanrosent...@gmail.com wrote:

 No. I don't understand why it's acceptable for a product to be sold with 
 enough bugs. Paying for a bug-fix release (one that would riddled with at 
 least some other issues) is not the answer. Imagine if you bought a 
 widescreen tv, only to find that certain features worked only some of the 
 time and some not at all, to compound this, your cable service also presented 
 programming issues and challenges. Or your car. Features as prominent as a 
 gauge. Or even a major program like Mathematica, which is at least equally 
 sophisticated in context to Finale. Or an Adobe product. Think about what it 
 would mean to the market and to advances and innovations. We are stuck with a 
 great application that is unfortunately far from perfect and for some reason 
 the company does not have high enough standards to perfect their product the 
 way the other products I've mentioned perfect them. Comments?
 
 Dean
 
 --
 Dean Rosenthal
 www.deanrosenthal.org
 
 


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Craig Parmerlee
Yes, 2014 definitely has improvements.  But it made a huge step BACKWARD 
in HP.  On all prior releases, I never had to fiddle with HP.  I simply 
turned it on and the music sounded better - much better.  I understand 
that there are additional tweaks that people do to improve on the out 
of the box results with HP, but in all cases in the past, turning HP on 
was always better than having it off.

That is simply not true with 2014.  I have to do all sorts of fiddling 
to get HP to even play all the notes -- and even then some notes are not 
sounded.  After my fiddling, HP mostly sounds better that going without 
HP, but it still messes up some things -- especially the interpretation 
of staccatos.  I have had to resort to 3 kinds of staccatos to fake HP 
into having the right length in all cases.  Without such a work-around, 
it makes some of the staccatos full value and others barely audible. 
This seems mostly random, and I cannot come up with any articulation 
definition has good staccato interpretation for all passages.  I never 
had to do any of that before.  It is broken and MakeMusic will not 
acknowledge it.

I raised this question, not to complain about the status (which I think 
we all agree is way too buggy), and not to hear the reasons why I 
shouldn't be using 2014.  What I am looking for is any insights anybody 
might have about the likelihood of this product ever getting some 
commercial level of maintenance.

Basically the question is this.  Are we now at Finale's end of life for 
practical purposes, take it or leave it?  Or should we expect this 
company will produce something better at some stage?




On 10/13/2014 11:45 AM, Robert Patterson wrote:
 In the last couple of months I migrated to Fin14, and I have to say that,
 despite the relative instability compared with Fin12 I am hooked. I love
 the Keyless score feature and the changes to how smart shapes are assigned.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Craig Parmerlee
OK, Eric.  When can I buy the new version that corrects some of the old 
bugs?  Money is not the issue for me.  The amount of my valuable time 
this product wastes is the issue.



On 10/13/2014 1:35 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
 And Adobe also does what people are accusing MakeMusic of.moving on and 
 fixing issues (or working around them) in newer versions.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
On Mon, October 13, 2014 1:47 pm, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
 Are we now at Finale's end of life for
 practical purposes, take it or leave it?  Or should we expect this
 company will produce something better at some stage?

I'm going with end of life.

After the year's hiatus, I expected a really powerful rewrite in key areas.
Instead, the program made easy things harder and hard things even harder. If
this is how they're developing, I see no real improvement in the future.

I am SO tired of workarounds.







___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Eric Dannewitz
UmI'm supposed to know this? Probably when the next version of Finale comes 
around?

On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Craig Parmerlee cr...@parmerlee.com wrote:

 OK, Eric.  When can I buy the new version that corrects some of the old 
 bugs?  Money is not the issue for me.  The amount of my valuable time 
 this product wastes is the issue.
 
 
 
 On 10/13/2014 1:35 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
 And Adobe also does what people are accusing MakeMusic of.moving on and 
 fixing issues (or working around them) in newer versions.
 


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


Re: [Finale] Anybody think we will ever see any more fixes for F2014?

2014-10-13 Thread Craig Parmerlee
The point is that many of us would be OK paying for a new release if 
that is what it took to get bug fixes.  The point is that Makemusic does 
neither new releases nor bug fixes.  As far as I can tell, they just let 
the thing sit.

Looking at Adobe's support site, I agree they are somewhat limited in 
their patches.  For example, Photoshop 13 had 5 patch cycles in 2 years 
then there was a new release in June of this year.

There have been a couple of functioning patch sets for Finale 2014, but 
IIRC, the last one only had a small handful of bug fixes.  Other 
products I use (e.g. SONAR or Band-in-a-box) release patch sets that fix 
hundreds of issues.

But mainly it is a question if Makemusic is even in the maintenance 
business, let alone enhancement business anymore.  I just thought 
somebody might have some insights about that, but I guess not.



On 10/13/2014 2:03 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
 UmI'm supposed to know this? Probably when the next version of Finale 
 comes around?

 On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Craig Parmerlee cr...@parmerlee.com wrote:

 OK, Eric.  When can I buy the new version that corrects some of the old
 bugs?  Money is not the issue for me.  The amount of my valuable time
 this product wastes is the issue.



 On 10/13/2014 1:35 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
 And Adobe also does what people are accusing MakeMusic of.moving on and 
 fixing issues (or working around them) in newer versions.



 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu