Re: [Finale] Vertical Spacing Algorithms

2005-07-07 Thread Michael Cook
Yes, that's at the top of my list too: Intelligent vertical spacing for 
staves within each system and between each system.


I can't imagine which users would not benefit from this feature. As a 
performer, I'm sick of having to use scores where the staves are too 
far apart: in many cases people seem to have just kept the Finale 
default spacing, which leaves far too much white space. This happens 
even with scores from reputable publishers: for an orchestral score the 
paper will be far too big (A3 is typical in Europe), but the staves and 
notes will be surprisingly small and hard to read. I think that the use 
of programs such as Finale has helped to spread the strange idea that a 
well-made score should have equally spaced staves and systems: this 
needs to change.


Michael Cook

On 6 Jul 2005, at 16:31, Randolph Peters wrote:


My number 1 new feature request:

Vertical Spacing Algorithms

Number 2:

Dynamic score/parts linking.

-Randolph Peters


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Vertical Spacing Algorithms

2005-07-06 Thread Randolph Peters
I'm glad Sibelius has dynamic score/parts linking because it will 
cause MakeMusic to try to add that feature as well. Competition from 
Sibelius is a better incentive than anything we can do on this list.


That being said, I still think we should encourage MM to add Vertical 
Spacing Algorithms similar to what the program does for horizontal 
spacing.


My biggest time suck when doing the layout of an orchestral score is 
moving things that collide or are too close to each other on 
neighbouring staves. Now that Finale knows where all the elements of 
a score are placed, it should theoretically be possible to know if 
two elements are touching each other.


My number 1 new feature request:

Vertical Spacing Algorithms

Number 2:

Dynamic score/parts linking.

-Randolph Peters
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Vertical Spacing Algorithms

2005-07-06 Thread Randolph Peters

I wrote:

My number 1 new feature request:
Vertical Spacing Algorithms
Number 2:
Dynamic score/parts linking.


I feel like Bill Murray in The Life Aquatic: Am I the only one with 
swamp leaches? What's with that?


Am I the only one who wants vertical spacing handled automatically?

-Randolph Peters
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Vertical Spacing Algorithms

2005-07-06 Thread Eric Dussault

No you're not. I made this request several times in the last years.

Éric Dussault

Le 05-07-06 à 12:11, Randolph Peters a écrit :


I wrote:


My number 1 new feature request:
Vertical Spacing Algorithms
Number 2:
Dynamic score/parts linking.



I feel like Bill Murray in The Life Aquatic: Am I the only one  
with swamp leaches? What's with that?


Am I the only one who wants vertical spacing handled automatically?






___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Vertical Spacing Algorithms

2005-07-06 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 11:11 AM 7/6/05 -0500, Randolph Peters wrote:
Am I the only one who wants vertical spacing handled automatically?

Definitely not the only one! It's not on the very top of my list, but it
would save considerable time -- and if it were part of an algorithmic
approach, could be modified nicely by the visual plugin maestros such as
Robert Patterson. (And vertical spacing was one of the really fine features
of Graphire.)

Dennis


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Vertical Spacing Algorithms

2005-07-06 Thread Andrew Stiller


Am I the only one who wants vertical spacing handled automatically?

-Randolph Peters
___



No you're not. I would greatly appreciate it too. Of course, it should 
be automatic only in the same sense that horizontal page and measure 
layout is automatic: Finale should supply you with its best  
approximation when you first lay out systems, but after that you adjust 
it manually or reinvoke it in a selected region  w. a Mass-Edit  or 
Layout menu command. Also, the degree of vertical collision 
avoidance--and what items should be  considered--should be 
user-configurable, just as in the existing Music Spacing dialog.


Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Vertical Spacing Algorithms

2005-07-06 Thread David W. Fenton
On 6 Jul 2005 at 11:11, Randolph Peters wrote:

 I wrote:
 My number 1 new feature request:
 Vertical Spacing Algorithms
 Number 2:
 Dynamic score/parts linking.
 
 I feel like Bill Murray in The Life Aquatic: Am I the only one with
 swamp leaches? What's with that?
 
 Am I the only one who wants vertical spacing handled automatically?

While that would be nice (the same way that automatic word extensions 
is nice), I've never seen it as too much of a problem to make the 
adjustments myself, as the tools to do so are pretty easy to use, and 
are a natural part of the initial layout proofing of the score layout 
(once you've locked down your page and system breaks).

So, while it would be something I'd be happy to have, it wouldn't be 
nearly the productivity enhancement that linked parts would be for 
me.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] Vertical Spacing Algorithms

2005-07-06 Thread Gary Griffiths
When I ordered my Fin2k6 and filled in the questionnaire - that was the one
feature I asked for. I have also requested it before.

Gary

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
Sent: 06 July 2005 17:28
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Vertical Spacing Algorithms

At 11:11 AM 7/6/05 -0500, Randolph Peters wrote:
Am I the only one who wants vertical spacing handled automatically?

Definitely not the only one! It's not on the very top of my list, but it
would save considerable time -- and if it were part of an algorithmic
approach, could be modified nicely by the visual plugin maestros such as
Robert Patterson. (And vertical spacing was one of the really fine features
of Graphire.)

Dennis


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Vertical Spacing Algorithms

2005-07-06 Thread Matthew Hindson Fastmail Account

My number 1 new feature request:
Vertical Spacing Algorithms
Number 2:
Dynamic score/parts linking.



I feel like Bill Murray in The Life Aquatic: Am I the only one with 
swamp leaches? What's with that?


Am I the only one who wants vertical spacing handled automatically?

-Randolph Peters


No, not at all - it would be wonderful.  You would think that with the 
font annotation that's been in Finale since what, 2000?, that they would 
have done this by now.  Combined with a Vertical Justification 
feature, this would be wonderful.


The thing is that as far as I can see the tools have been there to 
implement this for a long time - TGTools has something very much like 
the Vertical Justification feature there already.  Whether Makemusic 
could implement it *well*, though, is another matter.


These sorts of things are going to go further to burying Finale I think. 
 In education in this country it's only Finale Notepad that is saving 
any semblance of Makemusic.  Sibelius is all-pervasive.


(On another matter, you still can't undo plugins in Sibelius 4 it seems! 
 What the hell is that about.  So Sibelius sure aren't perfect!)


Cheers

Matthew


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.9/42 - Release Date: 6/07/2005

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Vertical Spacing Algorithms

2005-07-06 Thread Mark D Lew

On Jul 6, 2005, at 9:50 AM, Andrew Stiller wrote:

No you're not. I would greatly appreciate it too. Of course, it should 
be automatic only in the same sense that horizontal page and measure 
layout is automatic: Finale should supply you with its best  
approximation when you first lay out systems, but after that you 
adjust it manually or reinvoke it in a selected region  w. a Mass-Edit 
 or Layout menu command. Also, the degree of vertical collision 
avoidance--and what items should be  considered--should be 
user-configurable, just as in the existing Music Spacing dialog.


Agreed.  The best thing about Finale is that even when it offers 
solutions, it doesn't impose them upon you; you can always do it 
yourself if you want something different.


I would pursue the analogy a little further and specify that 
implementing vertical spacing is an action you perform on a page when 
you choose to, just as you implement horizontal spacing on a measure or 
measures with the 3 or 4 metatool.  For those who want vertical spacing 
turned on all the time, there can be an automatic page spacing 
analogous to the current automatic music spacing and automatic 
update layout.  Anyone who doesn't want the new vertical spacing can 
leave it turned off and never use it.


mdl

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale