Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-25 Thread Paul Hayden
Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:
And a third [hard drive] to back up the second because reinstalling it all 
[sample libraries] from DVDs is a PITA.

That's a good point, Steve. I have backups of my system drive but not the 
samples drive. That _would_ be a PITA to reinstall from DVDs.


Steve also wrote:
I also rarely use convolution reverb because it gains me nothing over my 
favourite Wave Arts reverb which can be instantiated dozens of times with 
little processing hit.

I've never done a comparison of convolution reverbs and algorithmic reverbs. 
Have you ever compared Wave Arts to any convolution reverb? If so, how did it 
fare? If I had a new badass computer, I'd probably just go with convolution.


Nick Raspa wrote:
...a second drive is necessary if for no other reason than to house the 
libraries.

Yes, sample companies recommend that so (I guess) you don't get a data 
bottleneck with system/application/sample data being accessed simultaneously.


Nick also wrote:
It sounds like I should take a close look at DP before investing in Logic.

I've never used Logic, but I bet it's deep like DP and Finale. Not something 
you (or maybe just me!) can master quickly.

Paul Hayden




Magnolia Music Press
www.paulhayden.com
Voice  Pre-arranged fax:  225-769-9604


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-24 Thread Paul Hayden
Hi Nick  Steve,

I have an old Mac Pro (1,1, 2 dual-core Xeon, 2.66 GHz) with a second 
internal hard drive just for sample libraries. I don't do any sequencing in 
Finale as I don't want to pay for mental health counseling. Sequencing is in 
Digital Performer using East West Quantum Leap Symphonic Orchestra along with a 
couple of Vienna instruments. 

I've done orchestral sequences with lots of tracks with no problems -- but I 
don't use convolution reverb (_some_ kind of reverb is necessary for any Vienna 
stuff). So, I don't know if that would bring everything crashing down or not.

I tried GPO a couple of years ago but didn't like it. I only use it for very 
high or low notes not available in the other libraries!

Paul Hayden

*

Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:

I'm not sure at the moment. ?I've been using Garritan and probably will 
continue to use it, however, I know there are some other good sound libraries 
out there, so I will have to investigate them and see what will work best for 
me. ?It sounds like the issue lies more with space and that a second drive will 
be needed. ?Thanks to everyone who responded!
Nick Raspa
NJR Music Enterprises

On Apr 23, 2012, at 08:46 AM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:

Any idea which virtual orchestra?
As has been said, Finale with Garritan runs very lightly. 
I run easy west symphonic orchestra gold and that runs best from an external 
FireWire. 
EWSI Platinum is best run from at least four separate drives for brass, wind, 
strings and percussion as it uses multiple mic setups for each instrument. 
I also use Miroslav Vitous orchestra and the full version of Garritan. 
A combination of internal drive and one FireWire with EWSI on it runs any 
combination of these. 
I seem to run out of processing power with a single instance of the new QL 
piano (which is very fine!) but a friend runs it from a G5 without problem. 
This is the only glitch I've ever had running from my old intel MacBook..

Steve P. 



Magnolia Music Press
www.paulhayden.com
Voice  Pre-arranged fax:  225-769-9604


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-24 Thread Steve Parker
Hi Paul, 
I use DP too.. I may be alone in the UK in that..! I prefer it to Logic by far.
Your setup is not far from mine. I also rarely use convolution reverb because 
it gains me nothing over my favourite  Wave Arts reverb which can be 
instantiated dozens of times with little processing hit. 
I find Garritan useful for smaller ensembles. EWQLSO gives a bit of unwanted 
'Hollywood' to small band stuff which is odd (to me).

Steve P. 

On 24 Apr 2012, at 19:37, Paul Hayden phayden...@cox.net wrote:

 Hi Nick  Steve,
 
 I have an old Mac Pro (1,1, 2 dual-core Xeon, 2.66 GHz) with a second 
 internal hard drive just for sample libraries. I don't do any sequencing in 
 Finale as I don't want to pay for mental health counseling. Sequencing is in 
 Digital Performer using East West Quantum Leap Symphonic Orchestra along with 
 a couple of Vienna instruments. 
 
 I've done orchestral sequences with lots of tracks with no problems -- but I 
 don't use convolution reverb (_some_ kind of reverb is necessary for any 
 Vienna stuff). So, I don't know if that would bring everything crashing down 
 or not.
 
 I tried GPO a couple of years ago but didn't like it. I only use it for very 
 high or low notes not available in the other libraries!
 
 Paul Hayden
 
 *
 
 Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:
 
 I'm not sure at the moment. ?I've been using Garritan and probably will 
 continue to use it, however, I know there are some other good sound libraries 
 out there, so I will have to investigate them and see what will work best for 
 me. ?It sounds like the issue lies more with space and that a second drive 
 will be needed. ?Thanks to everyone who responded!
 Nick Raspa
 NJR Music Enterprises
 
 On Apr 23, 2012, at 08:46 AM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:
 
 Any idea which virtual orchestra?
 As has been said, Finale with Garritan runs very lightly. 
 I run easy west symphonic orchestra gold and that runs best from an external 
 FireWire. 
 EWSI Platinum is best run from at least four separate drives for brass, wind, 
 strings and percussion as it uses multiple mic setups for each instrument. 
 I also use Miroslav Vitous orchestra and the full version of Garritan. 
 A combination of internal drive and one FireWire with EWSI on it runs any 
 combination of these. 
 I seem to run out of processing power with a single instance of the new QL 
 piano (which is very fine!) but a friend runs it from a G5 without problem. 
 This is the only glitch I've ever had running from my old intel MacBook..
 
 Steve P. 
 
 
 
 Magnolia Music Press
 www.paulhayden.com
 Voice  Pre-arranged fax:  225-769-9604
 
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-24 Thread Nick Raspa
Hi Paul  Steve,

It sounds like I should take a close look at DP before investing in Logic.  It 
has become obvious to me, from all the responses, that a second drive is 
necessary if for no other reason than to house the libraries.

Nick Raspa
NJR Music Enterprises

On Apr 24, 2012, at 02:32 PM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:

Hi Paul, 
I use DP too.. I may be alone in the UK in that..! I prefer it to Logic by far.
Your setup is not far from mine. I also rarely use convolution reverb because 
it gains me nothing over my favourite Wave Arts reverb which can be 
instantiated dozens of times with little processing hit. 
I find Garritan useful for smaller ensembles. EWQLSO gives a bit of unwanted 
'Hollywood' to small band stuff which is odd (to me).

Steve P. 

On 24 Apr 2012, at 19:37, Paul Hayden phayden...@cox.net wrote:

 Hi Nick  Steve,
 
 I have an old Mac Pro (1,1, 2 dual-core Xeon, 2.66 GHz) with a second 
 internal hard drive just for sample libraries. I don't do any sequencing in 
 Finale as I don't want to pay for mental health counseling. Sequencing is in 
 Digital Performer using East West Quantum Leap Symphonic Orchestra along with 
 a couple of Vienna instruments. 
 
 I've done orchestral sequences with lots of tracks with no problems -- but I 
 don't use convolution reverb (_some_ kind of reverb is necessary for any 
 Vienna stuff). So, I don't know if that would bring everything crashing down 
 or not.
 
 I tried GPO a couple of years ago but didn't like it. I only use it for very 
 high or low notes not available in the other libraries!
 
 Paul Hayden
 
 *
 
 Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:
 
 I'm not sure at the moment. ?I've been using Garritan and probably will 
 continue to use it, however, I know there are some other good sound libraries 
 out there, so I will have to investigate them and see what will work best for 
 me. ?It sounds like the issue lies more with space and that a second drive 
 will be needed. ?Thanks to everyone who responded!
 Nick Raspa
 NJR Music Enterprises
 
 On Apr 23, 2012, at 08:46 AM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:
 
 Any idea which virtual orchestra?
 As has been said, Finale with Garritan runs very lightly. 
 I run easy west symphonic orchestra gold and that runs best from an external 
 FireWire. 
 EWSI Platinum is best run from at least four separate drives for brass, wind, 
 strings and percussion as it uses multiple mic setups for each instrument. 
 I also use Miroslav Vitous orchestra and the full version of Garritan. 
 A combination of internal drive and one FireWire with EWSI on it runs any 
 combination of these. 
 I seem to run out of processing power with a single instance of the new QL 
 piano (which is very fine!) but a friend runs it from a G5 without problem. 
 This is the only glitch I've ever had running from my old intel MacBook..
 
 Steve P. 
 
 
 
 Magnolia Music Press
 www.paulhayden.com
 Voice  Pre-arranged fax: 225-769-9604
 
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-24 Thread Steve Parker

On 24 Apr 2012, at 21:29, Nick Raspa wrote:

 It sounds like I should take a close look at DP before investing in Logic.

DP is one of those pieces of software that you'd have to prise from my cold, 
dead (virtual) fingers..
I'm still waiting for the same emotional attachment to Finale!

  It has become obvious to me, from all the responses, that a second drive is 
 necessary if for no other reason than to house the libraries.

And a third to back up the second because reinstalling it all from DVDs is a 
PITA..

Steve P.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-23 Thread Steve Parker
How many tracks are you likely to record at once?
My internal 4200rpm (as slow as they come) will record 16 tracks of 24/44 
reliably. 
I also use the MacBooks internal drive as my live rig playing rhodes, wurli, 
piano, hammond, strings, brass..
all run as AUs inside Mainstage or DP. 

So.. the internal may be fine.

I've found no difference between external 5400rpm and 7200rpm drives. 
I have found FireWire to get better track counts than USB 2 on drives 
enclosures with both. 

I cannot reliably record even stereo to a flash drive. 

I've spent years trying this stuff all ways. 
For most of my work I don't get second chances because of computer stuff ups..

Steve P. 

On 22 Apr 2012, at 23:55, Christopher Smith christopher.sm...@videotron.ca 
wrote:

 A separate partition on the same drive won't help you, as the mechanism is 
 the same. You need a separate PHYSICAL drive on a different bus, and I 
 understand that you need certain minimum rotation speeds and search speeds. I 
 may be wrong here, but I think flash drives are not quick enough for audio 
 recording. Please verify this by looking up the specs on the software 
 website; they are very good at providing this information usually.
 
 Christopher
 
 
 
 On Sun Apr 22, at SundayApr 22 6:48 PM, Nick Raspa wrote:
 
 So the OS is on my computer hard drive and the imputed data is going to a 
 separate drive that doesn't impact the main computer (such as in flash 
 drive) similar to hard drive partition except that the second drive 
 (partition) is external?
 Nick Raspa
 NJR Music Enterprises
 
 On Apr 22, 2012, at 04:39 PM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:
 
 Not really hard drive space. 
 More throughput. Recording to a different drive to the one running the OS.
 
 Steve P. 
 
 On 22 Apr 2012, at 22:06, Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:
 
 hard drive space is more the concern. Is my understanding correct?
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-23 Thread Nick Raspa
My concern right now is with virtual instruments rather than live recording.  I 
just want to ensure that whatever hardware I get, it will handle a full 
orchestra of virtual instruments without hiccups due to lack of speed or space.
Nick Raspa
NJR Music Enterprises

On Apr 23, 2012, at 05:31 AM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:

How many tracks are you likely to record at once?
My internal 4200rpm (as slow as they come) will record 16 tracks of 24/44 
reliably. 
I also use the MacBooks internal drive as my live rig playing rhodes, wurli, 
piano, hammond, strings, brass..
all run as AUs inside Mainstage or DP. 

So.. the internal may be fine.

I've found no difference between external 5400rpm and 7200rpm drives. 
I have found FireWire to get better track counts than USB 2 on drives 
enclosures with both. 

I cannot reliably record even stereo to a flash drive. 

I've spent years trying this stuff all ways. 
For most of my work I don't get second chances because of computer stuff ups..

Steve P. 

On 22 Apr 2012, at 23:55, Christopher Smith christopher.sm...@videotron.ca 
wrote:

 A separate partition on the same drive won't help you, as the mechanism is 
 the same. You need a separate PHYSICAL drive on a different bus, and I 
 understand that you need certain minimum rotation speeds and search speeds. I 
 may be wrong here, but I think flash drives are not quick enough for audio 
 recording. Please verify this by looking up the specs on the software 
 website; they are very good at providing this information usually.
 
 Christopher
 
 
 
 On Sun Apr 22, at SundayApr 22 6:48 PM, Nick Raspa wrote:
 
 So the OS is on my computer hard drive and the imputed data is going to a 
 separate drive that doesn't impact the main computer (such as in flash 
 drive) similar to hard drive partition except that the second drive 
 (partition) is external?
 Nick Raspa
 NJR Music Enterprises
 
 On Apr 22, 2012, at 04:39 PM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:
 
 Not really hard drive space. 
 More throughput. Recording to a different drive to the one running the OS.
 
 Steve P. 
 
 On 22 Apr 2012, at 22:06, Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:
 
 hard drive space is more the concern. Is my understanding correct?
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-23 Thread Steve Parker
Any idea which virtual orchestra?
As has been said, Finale with Garritan runs very lightly. 
I run easy west symphonic orchestra gold and that runs best from an external 
FireWire. 
EWSI Platinum is best run from at least four separate drives for brass, wind, 
strings and percussion as it uses multiple mic setups for each instrument. 
I also use Miroslav Vitous orchestra and the full version of Garritan. 
A combination of internal drive and one FireWire with EWSI on it runs any 
combination of these. 
I seem to run out of processing power with a single instance of the new QL 
piano (which is very fine!) but a friend runs it from a G5 without problem. 
This is the only glitch I've ever had running from my old intel MacBook..

Steve P. 

On 23 Apr 2012, at 14:10, Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:

 My concern right now is with virtual instruments rather than live recording.  
 I just want to ensure that whatever hardware I get, it will handle a full 
 orchestra of virtual instruments without hiccups due to lack of speed or 
 space.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-23 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
On Mon, April 23, 2012 9:10 am, Nick Raspa wrote:
 My concern right now is with virtual instruments rather than live recording.
  I just want to ensure that whatever hardware I get, it will handle a full
 orchestra of virtual instruments without hiccups due to lack of speed or
 space.

Right now it looks like a fast internal hard drive is still the best bet.
Internal solid-state drives (SSDs) are great for reading but the writes are
still slow and comparable to hard drives.

External drives are comparable in speed (hard drive / SSD) because of the
interface sloweness.

Since you're interested in virtual instruments, the biggest issue is going to
be reading the instrument data from hard drive into memory. Depending on the
virtual instrument software, you may want a separate hard drive or even a
separate machine to house it. And if you switch software, it may demand a new
hardware configuration.

If you're interested in a PC-based system, check out this guy:
 http://www.adkproaudio.com/

I used to build my own PC-based systems, but now use his -- about the same as
building your own, but he specializes in audio/video workstations. He can
advise depending on the kind of virtual instruments you're going to use.

Dennis




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-23 Thread Nick Raspa
I'm not sure at the moment.  I've been using Garritan and probably will 
continue to use it, however, I know there are some other good sound libraries 
out there, so I will have to investigate them and see what will work best for 
me.  It sounds like the issue lies more with space and that a second drive will 
be needed.  Thanks to everyone who responded!
Nick Raspa
NJR Music Enterprises

On Apr 23, 2012, at 08:46 AM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:

Any idea which virtual orchestra?
As has been said, Finale with Garritan runs very lightly. 
I run easy west symphonic orchestra gold and that runs best from an external 
FireWire. 
EWSI Platinum is best run from at least four separate drives for brass, wind, 
strings and percussion as it uses multiple mic setups for each instrument. 
I also use Miroslav Vitous orchestra and the full version of Garritan. 
A combination of internal drive and one FireWire with EWSI on it runs any 
combination of these. 
I seem to run out of processing power with a single instance of the new QL 
piano (which is very fine!) but a friend runs it from a G5 without problem. 
This is the only glitch I've ever had running from my old intel MacBook..

Steve P. 

On 23 Apr 2012, at 14:10, Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:

 My concern right now is with virtual instruments rather than live recording. 
 I just want to ensure that whatever hardware I get, it will handle a full 
 orchestra of virtual instruments without hiccups due to lack of speed or 
 space.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsuedu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Nick Raspa
Hello,

I am preparing to purchase a new mac and would like your imput regarding specs 
necessary to properly run Finale and a program such as Pro Logic.  I do have to 
consider cost.
Nick Raspa
NJR Music Enterprises
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Steve Parker
Depends what you want to do. 
I have one of the first intel MacBooks and that will run Finale with no probs 
and record 24+ (probably very +) tracks of 24/44.1 audio and run a ton of large 
sample libraries. 

Unless you specifically need to do something more than this then anything you 
can currently buy should be great. 

Steve P. 

On 22 Apr 2012, at 16:02, Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I am preparing to purchase a new mac and would like your imput regarding 
 specs necessary to properly run Finale and a program such as Pro Logic.  I do 
 have to consider cost.
 Nick Raspa
 NJR Music Enterprises
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Christopher Smith
Finale will run on minimal specs. It's very light, even with Garritan playback. 
I would concentrate on what is needed to run Pro Logic, which unfortunately I 
can't advise you on.

Christopher


On Sun Apr 22, at SundayApr 22 11:02 AM, Nick Raspa wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I am preparing to purchase a new mac and would like your imput regarding 
 specs necessary to properly run Finale and a program such as Pro Logic.  I do 
 have to consider cost.
 Nick Raspa
 NJR Music Enterprises
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Logic for doing what? Recording? Virtual instruments?

Any Mac can do it, but if you are going to record audio or use a lot
of sample libraries, you'll want to tracks/record using a different
hard drive like a FireWire/usb2/thunderbolt drive. Using just one
drive for everything will drop your performance a lot. Unless you can
afford a huge 256+ gig SSD. Then you could do everything on one disk

Sent from my iSomething
--


On Apr 22, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I am preparing to purchase a new mac and would like your imput regarding 
 specs necessary to properly run Finale and a program such as Pro Logic.  I do 
 have to consider cost.
 Nick Raspa
 NJR Music Enterprises
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Steve Parker
This is conventional wisdom and very good advice.. but still depends on how 
much you need to do at once. 
My ageing MacBook has no problem recording 16 tracks or 24/44 to the internal 
4200rpm drive. 
External drives are so cheap though...

Steve P. 

On 22 Apr 2012, at 18:53, Eric Dannewitz ericd...@jazz-sax.com wrote:

 Any Mac can do it, but if you are going to record audio or use a lot
 of sample libraries, you'll want to tracks/record using a different
 hard drive like a FireWire/usb2/thunderbolt drive.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread SN jef chippewa

when i moved from desktop to portable, for questions of 
transportability and price i got the faster (2.53 GHz) of the two 
macbook pro 13 available at the time rather than 15 or 17 and put 
the saved money into a 24 monitor that stays home when i travel. 
the 13 is much lighter and takes up less space when travelling 
(whether to/from office/home or on the road).

i don't run logic but can't see that it would pose any problems if i did.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Eric Dannewitz
I just replaced a 2006 iMac that I was using in my studio. It could
record fine at 44.1khz. Never more than 20 tracks.

However, if you start throwing plugins into the mix, things started
going south fast. Add say an instance of Aliverbor a waves
compressor...then the track count on the machine dropped to maybe 6 on
a good day. Certainly couldn't get that if I did that on one drive.
And forget about doing anything at 96khz. I could get maybe 2 tracks
happening with plugins.

So, I'd still say whatever the person is going to do, having stuff
tracked to a non-system drive is the way to go

Sent from my iSomething
--

On Apr 22, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:

 This is conventional wisdom and very good advice.. but still depends on how 
 much you need to do at once.
 My ageing MacBook has no problem recording 16 tracks or 24/44 to the internal 
 4200rpm drive.
 External drives are so cheap though...

 Steve P.

 On 22 Apr 2012, at 18:53, Eric Dannewitz ericd...@jazz-sax.com wrote:

 Any Mac can do it, but if you are going to record audio or use a lot
 of sample libraries, you'll want to tracks/record using a different
 hard drive like a FireWire/usb2/thunderbolt drive.

 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Nick Raspa
I originally used Finale only for note setting and Opcode Vision for sequencing 
but Vision went the way of the dinosaur.  So I have been using Finale for both 
purposes (unfortunately).  My use of audio is generally for demos - virtual 
tracks with no live recording (at least not now).  Since I now have to get a 
new computer, I decided to invest in a good sequencing software package.  Pro 
Logic seems the way and I want to be able to use a variety of sound libraries.  
I don't use sound pads as a general rule but rather individual instruments, so 
a full orchestra sound is going to be a lot of processing power.  I hadn't 
thought about the use of external firewire/usb2/thunderbolt drive and that 
sounds like a good way to go, but, that will be new to me.

Apparently Finale isn't the processing hog I feared but the audio side is the 
problem.  It sounds like any mac will have the processing power I need for 
audio but hard drive space is more the concern.  Is my understanding correct?
Nick Raspa
NJR Music Enterprises

On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Eric Dannewitz ericd...@jazz-sax.com wrote:

Logic for doing what? Recording? Virtual instruments?

Any Mac can do it, but if you are going to record audio or use a lot
of sample libraries, you'll want to tracks/record using a different
hard drive like a FireWire/usb2/thunderbolt drive. Using just one
drive for everything will drop your performance a lot. Unless you can
afford a huge 256+ gig SSD. Then you could do everything on one disk

Sent from my iSomething
--


On Apr 22, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I am preparing to purchase a new mac and would like your imput regarding 
 specs necessary to properly run Finale and a program such as Pro Logic. I do 
 have to consider cost.
 Nick Raspa
 NJR Music Enterprises
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsuedu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Steve Parker
Not really hard drive space. 
More throughput. Recording to a different drive to the one running the OS.

Steve P. 

On 22 Apr 2012, at 22:06, Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:

 hard drive space is more the concern.  Is my understanding correct?
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Nick Raspa
So the OS is on my computer hard drive and the imputed data is going to a 
separate drive that doesn't impact the main computer (such as in flash drive) 
similar to hard drive partition except that the second drive (partition) is 
external?
Nick Raspa
NJR Music Enterprises

On Apr 22, 2012, at 04:39 PM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:

Not really hard drive space. 
More throughput. Recording to a different drive to the one running the OS.

Steve P. 

On 22 Apr 2012, at 22:06, Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:

 hard drive space is more the concern. Is my understanding correct?
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Christopher Smith
A separate partition on the same drive won't help you, as the mechanism is the 
same. You need a separate PHYSICAL drive on a different bus, and I understand 
that you need certain minimum rotation speeds and search speeds. I may be wrong 
here, but I think flash drives are not quick enough for audio recording. Please 
verify this by looking up the specs on the software website; they are very good 
at providing this information usually.

Christopher



On Sun Apr 22, at SundayApr 22 6:48 PM, Nick Raspa wrote:

 So the OS is on my computer hard drive and the imputed data is going to a 
 separate drive that doesn't impact the main computer (such as in flash drive) 
 similar to hard drive partition except that the second drive (partition) is 
 external?
 Nick Raspa
 NJR Music Enterprises
 
 On Apr 22, 2012, at 04:39 PM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:
 
 Not really hard drive space. 
 More throughput. Recording to a different drive to the one running the OS.
 
 Steve P. 
 
 On 22 Apr 2012, at 22:06, Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:
 
 hard drive space is more the concern. Is my understanding correct?
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Flash drives are way fast enough for recording, they just don't have a
lot of space

Sent from my iSomething
--


On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Christopher Smith
christopher.sm...@videotron.ca wrote:

 A separate partition on the same drive won't help you, as the mechanism is 
 the same. You need a separate PHYSICAL drive on a different bus, and I 
 understand that you need certain minimum rotation speeds and search speeds. I 
 may be wrong here, but I think flash drives are not quick enough for audio 
 recording. Please verify this by looking up the specs on the software 
 website; they are very good at providing this information usually.

 Christopher



 On Sun Apr 22, at SundayApr 22 6:48 PM, Nick Raspa wrote:

 So the OS is on my computer hard drive and the imputed data is going to a 
 separate drive that doesn't impact the main computer (such as in flash 
 drive) similar to hard drive partition except that the second drive 
 (partition) is external?
 Nick Raspa
 NJR Music Enterprises

 On Apr 22, 2012, at 04:39 PM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:

 Not really hard drive space.
 More throughput. Recording to a different drive to the one running the OS.

 Steve P.

 On 22 Apr 2012, at 22:06, Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:

 hard drive space is more the concern. Is my understanding correct?
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] suggestions sought

2012-04-22 Thread Richard Yates
How much do you need?

http://www.amazon.com/Kingston-Digital-DataTraveler-DTR500-128GB/dp/B004X3XI
R2



 -Original Message-
 From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf
Of
 Eric Dannewitz
 Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 9:17 PM
 To: finale@shsu.edu
 Subject: Re: [Finale] suggestions sought
 
 Flash drives are way fast enough for recording, they just don't have a lot
of space
 
 Sent from my iSomething
 --
 
 
 On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Christopher Smith
 christopher.sm...@videotron.ca wrote:
 
  A separate partition on the same drive won't help you, as the mechanism
is the
 same. You need a separate PHYSICAL drive on a different bus, and I
understand
 that you need certain minimum rotation speeds and search speeds. I may be
 wrong here, but I think flash drives are not quick enough for audio
recording.
 Please verify this by looking up the specs on the software website; they
are very
 good at providing this information usually.
 
  Christopher
 
 
 
  On Sun Apr 22, at SundayApr 22 6:48 PM, Nick Raspa wrote:
 
  So the OS is on my computer hard drive and the imputed data is going to
a
 separate drive that doesn't impact the main computer (such as in flash
drive)
 similar to hard drive partition except that the second drive (partition)
is external?
  Nick Raspa
  NJR Music Enterprises
 
  On Apr 22, 2012, at 04:39 PM, Steve Parker st...@pinkrat.co.uk wrote:
 
  Not really hard drive space.
  More throughput. Recording to a different drive to the one running the
OS.
 
  Steve P.
 
  On 22 Apr 2012, at 22:06, Nick Raspa nj...@me.com wrote:
 
  hard drive space is more the concern. Is my understanding correct?
  ___
  Finale mailing list
  Finale@shsu.edu
  http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
  ___
  Finale mailing list
  Finale@shsu.edu
  http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
  ___
  Finale mailing list
  Finale@shsu.edu
  http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale