[Fink-devel] Fwd: emboss compilation failed
Hi, A user reported this error for the emboss package that I maintain. Anyone has a clue what could be the problem? thanks, - Koen. Begin forwarded message: From: Guy Lauquin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: August 19, 2004 9:23:47 AM EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: emboss compilation failed Dear Koen, I am having a problem with emboss that does not compile. error messages: a lot of warnings like this: gcc -O2 -o .libs/prettyplot prettyplot.o -L/sw/lib ../nucleus/.libs/libnucleus.dylib ../ajax/.libs/libajaxg.dylib ../ajax/.libs/libajax.dylib ../plplot/.libs/libplplot.dylib -L/usr/X11R6/lib /sw/lib/libgd.dylib -L/sw/src/gd2-2.0.23-25/gd-2.0.23/.libs /sw/lib/libiconv.dylib -lXpm -lX11 /sw/lib/libjpeg.dylib -lfreetype -lpng12 -lpng -lz -lm ld: warning -L: directory name (/sw/src/gd2-2.0.23-25/gd-2.0.23/.libs) does not exist ld: warning prebinding disabled because dependent library: /sw/lib/libnucleus.0.dylib is not prebound --- a lot of warnings like this one: /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c 'pepinfo' '/sw/src/root-emboss-2.9.0-3/sw/bin/pepinfo' libtool: install: warning: `../nucleus/libnucleus.la' has not been installed in `/sw/lib' mkdir /sw/src/root-emboss-2.9.0-3/sw/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/org/emboss/ jemboss/editor install: *.class: No such file or directory make[7]: *** [install-exec-hook] Error 71 make[6]: *** [install-exec-am] Error 2 make[5]: *** [install-am] Error 2 make[4]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 ### execution of make failed, exit code 2 Failed: installing emboss-2.9.0-3 failed Any idea, Guy -- * Guy Lauquin Prof. of Biochemistry Victor Segalen University of Bordeaux IBGC/CNRS 1 rue C. St. Saens 33077 Bordeaux-cedex France tel.(33) 556 99 90 37fax: (33) 556 99 90 63 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: emboss compilation failed
Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, A user reported this error for the emboss package that I maintain. Anyone has a clue what could be the problem? [] a lot of warnings like this: Forget the warnings. [] mkdir /sw/src/root-emboss-2.9.0-3/sw/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/org/emboss/ jemboss/editor install: *.class: No such file or directory This sounds like none of the class files in the editor directory got compiled. There must have been earlier error messages concerning java. -- Martin --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] versioning Depends in info files
Is there a way to get the dependency engine to accept a specific version of another package but wildcard the revision field when searching? For example, I want Package A to depend on Package B-0.3.3, but I don't care what revision of Package B (eg 0.3.3-1 and 0.3.3-7 are OK, but 0.3.4-1 is no longer ok). I tried setting Depends to (= %v), but this gives me an error that Package B (= 0.3.3) has no matching package/versions found. Right now I'm using Depends: Package B (= %v), but this will invariably be affected once the package version gets increased. In other words, I don't want to hard code the revision number in case the Depended package changes in such a way that doesn't affect the functionality. Hanspeter -- The great tragedy of science is the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact. --Thomas Henry Huxley --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] openssl | openssl097
I see several packages have constructs like: Depends: openssl-shlibs | openssl097-shlibs BuildDepends: openssl-dev | openssl097-dev This is not correct--if, for example, one has openssl097-dev installed at build-time, then one *must* have openssl097-shlibs at run-time (openssl-shlibs will not suffice). A quick check of the crypto branch of the 10.3 and 10.2-gcc3.3 trees finds: 10.3: stable/crypto/finkinfo/stunnel4.info unstable/crypto/finkinfo/dcmtk-ssl.info unstable/crypto/finkinfo/net-snmp-ssl.info unstable/crypto/finkinfo/stunnel4.info 10.2-gcc3.3: unstable/crypto/finkinfo/ettercap-ssl-0.6.9-12.info unstable/crypto/finkinfo/net-snmp-ssl.info What's our current thought on us changing these and telling $Maintainer the situation vs. telling them to fix their packages and waiting for them to do so? dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] libtool and dynamic libraries
I am trying to get the most recent source for xcircuit (3.2.23) to run, so that hopefully the Fink package can be updated to a more recent version. (xcircuit is a schematic entry / drawing program.) In brief, I *seem* to be running into a problem with libtool. During the final link stage I get the following: ... rm -f lib/xcircuit.dylib gcc -g -O2 -fPIC -o lib/tcl/xcircuit.dylib -dynamiclib -bind_at_load xcwrap.o \ elements.o events.o filelist.o files.o fontfile.o formats.o functions.o help.o keybindings.o libraries.o menucalls.o netlist.o ngspice.o parameter.o python.o rcfile.o render.o schema.o selection.o text.o undo.o tclxcircuit.o tkSimple.o tkPixmap.o xcircuit.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib \ -lc -lXt -lSM -lICE -lm -lX11 -lXpm /usr/bin/libtool: unknown option character `b' in: -bind_at_load Usage: /usr/bin/libtool -static [-] file [...] [-filelist listfile[,dirname]] [-arch_only arch] [-sacLT] Usage: /usr/bin/libtool -dynamic [-] file [...] [-filelist listfile[,dirname]] [-arch_only arch] [-o output] [-install_name name] [-compatibility_version #] [-current_version #] [-seg1addr 0x#] [-segs_read_only_addr 0x#] [-segs_read_write_addr 0x#] [-seg_addr_table filename] [-seg_addr_table_filename file_system_path] [-all_load] [-noall_load] make[2]: *** [lib/tcl/xcircuit.dylib] Error 1 make[1]: *** [tcl] Error 2 make: *** [all-recursive] Error 2 There is discussion that the Mac OS X libtool is not THE libtool, and indeed glibtool (the real libtool) is installed on my system (Panther, 10.3.5). I have installed many Fink packages, including the Fink package of xcircuit (prior to my attempt to install from the more recent source). The -bind_at_load is a valid ld argument, from what I gather, and is generated in the configure.in file specifically for a Darwin system. The current Fink package for xcircuit (3.1.32), which works fine, generates the following final link command: gcc -g -O2 -L/sw/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -o xcircuit elements.o events.o filelist.o files.o fontfile.o formats.o functions.o help.o keybindings.o libraries.o menucalls.o netlist.o parameter.o python.o rcfile.o render.o schema.o selection.o text.o tclxcircuit.o tkSimple.o tkPixmap.o xcircuit.o Xw/libxcXw.a -lXt -lSM -lICE -lm -lX11 -lXpm Any thoughts where to go from here? The author of xcircuits apparently doesn't have a Darwin system (and suggested removing -bind_at_load, which didn't work), and I have not had a reply from the package maintainer (yet). I've seen some discussion of enabling glibtool in place of libtool, or telling libtool (which one?) to just pass along certain arguments. Thanks. Dale --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] XCode issue
netpbm 10.24-1 doesn't compile under Xcode 1.5 --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] new fink breaks fftw to fftw-mpi upgrade
Daniel, I have only tested this on one machine but it seems the current fink in 10.3 (0.21.2-1) breaks upgrading fftw/fftw-shlibs to fink-mpi/ fink-mpi-shlibs with the following comands... fink install fftw fink install fftw-mpi Now the installation of fftw-mpi fails with... /usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink install fftw-mpi Information about 1795 packages read in 2 seconds. The following package will be installed or updated: fftw-mpi The following additional package will be installed: fftw-mpi-shlibs Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y dpkg -i /sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/fftw-mpi_2.1.5-5_darwin-powerpc.deb /sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/fftw-mpi-shlibs_2.1.5-5_darwin-powerpc.deb dpkg: regarding .../fftw-mpi_2.1.5-5_darwin-powerpc.deb containing fftw-mpi: fftw-mpi conflicts with fftw fftw (version 2.1.5-5) is installed. fftw provides fftw and is installed. dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/fftw-mpi_2.1.5-5_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): conflicting packages - not installing fftw-mpi dpkg: regarding .../fftw-mpi-shlibs_2.1.5-5_darwin-powerpc.deb containing fftw-mpi-shlibs: fftw-mpi-shlibs conflicts with fftw-shlibs fftw-shlibs (version 2.1.5-5) is installed. fftw-shlibs provides fftw-shlibs and is installed. dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/fftw-mpi-shlibs_2.1.5-5_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): conflicting packages - not installing fftw-mpi-shlibs Errors were encountered while processing: /sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/fftw-mpi_2.1.5-5_darwin-powerpc.deb /sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/fftw-mpi-shlibs_2.1.5-5_darwin-powerpc.deb ### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1 Failed: can't batch-install packages: /sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/fftw-mpi_2.1.5-5_darwin-powerpc.deb /sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/fftw-mpi-shlibs_2.1.5-5_darwin-powerpc.deb This worked a week ago. Jack --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] vnc4 problem
vnc4.0rel-22 won't build, as it is looking for a wrongly named tarball. Fink is looking for vnc-4.0rel-unixsrc.tar.gz, but the name should be vnc-4.0-unixsrc.tar.gz, i.e. no rel in the middle of the name. I reported it to the maintainer, but he tells me that his update to vnc has been stuck in the Tracker for a long period. So it seems that someone else updated vnc4, but the update doesn't work. Kevin Horton --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] vnc4 problem
It's been fixed this time. Tracker, huh? I need to look at that more often. On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Kevin Horton wrote: vnc4.0rel-22 won't build, as it is looking for a wrongly named tarball. Fink is looking for vnc-4.0rel-unixsrc.tar.gz, but the name should be vnc-4.0-unixsrc.tar.gz, i.e. no rel in the middle of the name. I reported it to the maintainer, but he tells me that his update to vnc has been stuck in the Tracker for a long period. So it seems that someone else updated vnc4, but the update doesn't work. -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - [EMAIL PROTECTED] BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] XCode issue
Steve Dieringer wrote: netpbm 10.24-1 doesn't compile under Xcode 1.5 How so? -- Martin --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] libtool and dynamic libraries
Hi Dale, Have you tried passing -Wl,-bind_at_load ? By the way, if you pass -v -v to gcc, it will show you the libtool and ld commands it's running, so you can examine what's going wrong. Dave PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Fink-devel] XCode issue
Am 23.08.2004 um 18:33 schrieb Steve Dieringer: netpbm 10.24-1 doesn't compile under Xcode 1.5 Hmm, got Xcode 1.5 installed and netpbm 10.24-1 rebuild without problems. gecko --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] versioning Depends in info files
On Aug 23, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Is there a way to get the dependency engine to accept a specific version of another package but wildcard the revision field when searching? Hi Hanspeter, For my Galeon package I have to depend on a specific major version of Mozilla, eg: 1.7.*-* . The way I do this is: Depends: mozilla (= 1.7-1), mozilla ( 1.8-1) There are certain cases where this wouldn't work I guess, for example if Mozilla decided that instead of 1.8a1 they'd call it 1.7.99. But usually it works, and you can do the same sort of thing for your package. Dave PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Fink-devel] XCode issue
On Aug 23, 2004, at 4:38 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Steve Dieringer wrote: netpbm 10.24-1 doesn't compile under Xcode 1.5 How so? -- Martin Here's what I get. BTW, if it matters, I had the 'recalled' version of fink installed for a while. Since reverted per message on web site. But this is subsequent. libopt results: ' -L/sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/lib -lnetpbm' ld: warning prebinding not disabled because (__PAGEZERO segment (address = 0x0 size = 0x1000) of rasttopnm overlaps with __TEXT segment (address = 0x0 size = 0x1e000) of /sw/lib/libnetpbm.10.dylib ld: warning prebinding not disabled because (__TEXT segment (address = 0x1000 size = 0x3000) of rasttopnm overlaps with __TEXT segment (address = 0x0 size = 0x1e000) of /sw/lib/libnetpbm.10.dylib ld: warning prebinding not disabled because (__DATA segment (address = 0x4000 size = 0x1000) of rasttopnm overlaps with __TEXT segment (address = 0x0 size = 0x1e000) of /sw/lib/libnetpbm.10.dylib ld: warning prebinding not disabled because (__LINKEDIT segment (address = 0x5000 size = 0x2000) of rasttopnm overlaps with __TEXT segment (address = 0x0 size = 0x1e000) of /sw/lib/libnetpbm.10.dylib cc -no-cpp-precomp -c -I/sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/converter/other -I. -I/sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/util -I/sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/urt \ -I/sw/include -O3 -fstrict-aliasing -funroll-all-loops -isystem /sw/include -o pnmtopng.o pnmtopng.c cc -no-cpp-precomp -c -I/sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/converter/other -I. -I/sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/util -I/sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/urt \ -I/sw/include -O3 -fstrict-aliasing -funroll-all-loops -isystem /sw/include -o pngtxt.o pngtxt.c cc -no-cpp-precomp -L/sw/lib -o pnmtopng pnmtopng.o pngtxt.o \ `/sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/buildtools/libopt /sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/lib/libnetpbm.dylib libpng.dylib libz.dylib` \ -lm-L/sw/lib libopt results: ' -L/sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/lib -lnetpbm -lpng -lz' ld: warning prebinding disabled because of undefined symbols ld: Undefined symbols: _pm_seek2 _pm_tell2 make[2]: *** [pnmtopng] Error 1 make[1]: *** [other/all] Error 2 make: *** [converter/all] Error 2 ### execution of make failed, exit code 2 Failed: compiling netpbm10-10.24-1 failed --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] versioning Depends in info files
Dave Vasilevsky wrote: On Aug 23, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Is there a way to get the dependency engine to accept a specific version of another package but wildcard the revision field when searching? Hi Hanspeter, For my Galeon package I have to depend on a specific major version of Mozilla, eg: 1.7.*-* . The way I do this is: Depends: mozilla (= 1.7-1), mozilla ( 1.8-1) Did you actually try this? And did it do what you thought it should do? In my tests, when it was like you show it, it happily neglected the second dependency and installed the higher version anyway. When I interchanged the the two inequalities, put the first and the = second, I got the infamous node ... already exists error. -- Martin --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] openssl | openssl097
On Aug 23, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: I see several packages have constructs like: Depends: openssl-shlibs | openssl097-shlibs BuildDepends: openssl-dev | openssl097-dev This is not correct--if, for example, one has openssl097-dev installed at build-time, then one *must* have openssl097-shlibs at run-time (openssl-shlibs will not suffice). A quick check of the crypto branch of the 10.3 and 10.2-gcc3.3 trees finds: 10.3: stable/crypto/finkinfo/stunnel4.info unstable/crypto/finkinfo/dcmtk-ssl.info unstable/crypto/finkinfo/net-snmp-ssl.info unstable/crypto/finkinfo/stunnel4.info 10.2-gcc3.3: unstable/crypto/finkinfo/ettercap-ssl-0.6.9-12.info unstable/crypto/finkinfo/net-snmp-ssl.info What's our current thought on us changing these and telling $Maintainer the situation vs. telling them to fix their packages and waiting for them to do so? The ideal solution here would be to finish the Shlibs project, in which the -shlibs dependencies for a package would be calculated after the package is built, and recorded in the .deb file. That way, you can have a choice given under BuildDepends, and wind up with the correct dependency information. (Although admittedly, this would allow for two different binaries to be produced depending on the environment, so I suppose a strict interpretation of the fink rules would say that this should have been constructed as a variant in any event.) However, that's a long-term solution. In the short run, I don't think we've ever had a clear statement about when choices among library variants is permissible or not. (Another case is gnome-vfs and gnome-vfs-ssl, where I would imagine similar issues arise.) So the first step is to document what is the Right Thing to do, and then we can figure out if it's urgent enough to do on behalf of package maintainers or if we can just wait for them to do it. -- Dave --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] versioning Depends in info files
On Aug 23, 2004, at 5:21 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Depends: mozilla (= 1.7-1), mozilla ( 1.8-1) Did you actually try this? And did it do what you thought it should do? In my tests, when it was like you show it, it happily neglected the second dependency and installed the higher version anyway. When I interchanged the the two inequalities, put the first and the = second, I got the infamous node ... already exists error. Er, I didn't test it, but I think dpkg should deal with it fine, and apt-get too. I guess Fink's dep engine can't. The other alternatives are: 1) Make A depend on a specific revision of B, and then keep in touch with B's maintainer and/or subscribe to fink-commits. 2) Make a separate package Bxxx for just the required version, like we had with db317 for a while. Dave PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Fink-devel] openssl | openssl097
On Aug 23, 2004, at 6:21 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: On Aug 23, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: I see several packages have constructs like: Depends: openssl-shlibs | openssl097-shlibs BuildDepends: openssl-dev | openssl097-dev I apologize; I completely misread this message the first time. The response I sent, while perhaps interesting, was definitely off-topic! I agree that this is very bad, and we should fix it on behalf of the maintainers. -- Dave --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] XCode issue
On Aug 23, 2004, at 5:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ld: warning prebinding disabled because of undefined symbols ld: Undefined symbols: _pm_seek2 _pm_tell2 make[2]: *** [pnmtopng] Error 1 make[1]: *** [other/all] Error 2 make: *** [converter/all] Error 2 ### execution of make failed, exit code 2 Failed: compiling netpbm10-10.24-1 failed First result: they are defined in /sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/lib/pm.h and for some unknown reason these directory wasn´t included. They are DECLARED in pm.h, not defined. The definition of a symbol is the (compiled) function body. You probably have to look for a .c file. Dave PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Fink-devel] XCode issue
Am 23.08.2004 um 21:55 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Here's what I get: Welcome to Darwin! [Banshee:~] steved% nm /sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/lib/libnetpbm.10.24.dylib | grep _pm_tell2 2ed4 T _pm_tell2 [Banshee:~] steved% [Banshee:~] steved% nm /sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/lib/libnetpbm.10.24.dylib | grep _pm_seek2 2fd4 T _pm_seek2 Most of my fink was build with Xcode 1.1 and since 16th with 1.5. Rebuilding of netpbm10 workt without problems. Hmm, no idea whats going wrong on you box. Any possible problem source, i thought about, are cleared. Mayby someone else can help you here. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ nm /sw/lib/libnetpbm.10.24.dylib | grep _pm_seek2 ; nm /sw/lib/libnetpbm.10.24.dylib | grep _pm_tell2 2fd4 T _pm_seek2 2ed4 T _pm_tell2 gecko --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] XCode issue
Dave Vasilevsky wrote: On Aug 23, 2004, at 5:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ld: warning prebinding disabled because of undefined symbols ld: Undefined symbols: _pm_seek2 _pm_tell2 make[2]: *** [pnmtopng] Error 1 make[1]: *** [other/all] Error 2 make: *** [converter/all] Error 2 ### execution of make failed, exit code 2 Failed: compiling netpbm10-10.24-1 failed First result: they are defined in /sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/lib/pm.h and for some unknown reason these directory wasn´t included. They are DECLARED in pm.h, not defined. The definition of a symbol is the (compiled) function body. You probably have to look for a .c file. Right, they are defined in lib/libpm.c and should end up in lib/libnetpbm.dylib which was present on the original linker line. So probably something went wrong already in the compilation of lib/libnetpbm.dylib. -- Martin --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] XCode issue
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:13:34AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: Dave Vasilevsky wrote: On Aug 23, 2004, at 5:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ld: warning prebinding disabled because of undefined symbols ld: Undefined symbols: _pm_seek2 _pm_tell2 make[2]: *** [pnmtopng] Error 1 make[1]: *** [other/all] Error 2 make: *** [converter/all] Error 2 ### execution of make failed, exit code 2 Failed: compiling netpbm10-10.24-1 failed First result: they are defined in /sw/src/netpbm10-10.24-1/netpbm-10.24/lib/pm.h and for some unknown reason these directory wasn?t included. They are DECLARED in pm.h, not defined. The definition of a symbol is the (compiled) function body. You probably have to look for a .c file. Right, they are defined in lib/libpm.c and should end up in lib/libnetpbm.dylib which was present on the original linker line. So probably something went wrong already in the compilation of lib/libnetpbm.dylib. I wonder if when linking against that .dylib the linker is picking /sw/lib/libnetpbm.dylib instead of the one just compiled as part of the nascent package? Maybe having the package (or a previous version of it) already installed or not is an important variable here? Just speculating... dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
