Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

2003-10-02 Thread David R. Morrison
clisp-2.29 is also available from fink in binary form.  The binary was
compiled with gcc 3.1.

  -- Dave


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

2003-10-02 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 11:37 AM, Pascal J.Bourguignon wrote:

Jeff Whitaker writes:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Pascal J.Bourguignon wrote:
Pascal:  If you installed the gcc3.3 update, "sudo 
/usr/sbin/gcc_select
3.1" and rebuild f2c and fort77.  If you haven't installed gcc 3.3, 
I have
no idea what's wrong.
Ok, so some fink packages need 3.3, other need 3.1 (or is it 
2.95.2?).
Perhaps it would be possible for fink to select the right compiler 
for
each package?
3.3 is not officially supported in fink yet, there will be a 
10.2-gcc3.3
distribution shortly however.  Some packages need 2.95, but that is
handled automatically by the package. There are no packages in fink 
now
that need 3.3.  The clisp package works with 3.1.
Definitely not.  That's the only reason  why I upgraded to  3.3, to be
able to compile clisp 2.29 from fink.

I had no problems building clisp-2.29 with gcc 3.1.

--
Alexander K. Hansen
Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

2003-10-02 Thread Pascal J . Bourguignon

Jeff Whitaker writes:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Pascal J.Bourguignon wrote:
> > >
> > > Pascal:  If you installed the gcc3.3 update, "sudo /usr/sbin/gcc_select
> > > 3.1" and rebuild f2c and fort77.  If you haven't installed gcc 3.3, I have
> > > no idea what's wrong.
> >
> > Ok, so some fink packages need 3.3, other need 3.1 (or is it 2.95.2?).
> > Perhaps it would be possible for fink to select the right compiler for
> > each package?
> 
> 3.3 is not officially supported in fink yet, there will be a 10.2-gcc3.3
> distribution shortly however.  Some packages need 2.95, but that is
> handled automatically by the package. There are no packages in fink now
> that need 3.3.  The clisp package works with 3.1.

Definitely not.  That's the only reason  why I upgraded to  3.3, to be
able to compile clisp 2.29 from fink.


-- 
__Pascal_Bourguignon__
http://www.informatimago.com/
Do not adjust your mind, there is a fault in reality.


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

2003-10-01 Thread Jeff Whitaker
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Pascal J.Bourguignon wrote:

>
> >
> > 3.3 is not officially supported in fink yet, there will be a 10.2-gcc3.3
> > distribution shortly however.  Some packages need 2.95, but that is
> > handled automatically by the package. There are no packages in fink now
> > that need 3.3.  The clisp package works with 3.1.
>
> Definitely not.  That's the only reason  why I upgraded to  3.3, to be
> able to compile clisp 2.29 from fink.
>
>

clisp 2.29 compiles just fine (and even runs) with gcc 3.1.

-Jeff

-- 
Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (303)497-6313
NOAA/OAR/CDC  R/CDC1FAX   : (303)497-6449
325 BroadwayWeb   : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw
Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

2003-09-30 Thread Jeff Whitaker
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Pascal J.Bourguignon wrote:
> >
> > Pascal:  If you installed the gcc3.3 update, "sudo /usr/sbin/gcc_select
> > 3.1" and rebuild f2c and fort77.  If you haven't installed gcc 3.3, I have
> > no idea what's wrong.
>
> Ok, so some fink packages need 3.3, other need 3.1 (or is it 2.95.2?).
> Perhaps it would be possible for fink to select the right compiler for
> each package?
>
>

3.3 is not officially supported in fink yet, there will be a 10.2-gcc3.3
distribution shortly however.  Some packages need 2.95, but that is
handled automatically by the package. There are no packages in fink now
that need 3.3.  The clisp package works with 3.1.

-Jeff

 --
Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (303)497-6313
NOAA/OAR/CDC  R/CDC1FAX   : (303)497-6449
325 BroadwayWeb   : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw
Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

2003-09-30 Thread Pascal J . Bourguignon

David R. Morrison writes:
> I suppose you are using the updated Developer Tools?  There is a problem
> with fort77 and the new tools.  As it says on Fink's homepage, users
> are advised not to update their developer tools, or if they do, to be
> sure and run "sudo gcc_select 3" before using fink to compile packages.
> 
> The problem with fort77 might actually lie in f2c, so you may need to go
> back and recompile various things to get fort77 to work.

Yes,  I did  update my  developer tools  because there  was no  way to
compile clisp  with gcc  3.1.  So my  currently selected  gcc compiler
indeed is 3.3.


Jeffrey S Whitaker writes:
> 
> Pascal:  If you installed the gcc3.3 update, "sudo /usr/sbin/gcc_select
> 3.1" and rebuild f2c and fort77.  If you haven't installed gcc 3.3, I have
> no idea what's wrong.

Ok, so some fink packages need 3.3, other need 3.1 (or is it 2.95.2?).
Perhaps it would be possible for fink to select the right compiler for
each package?
 

>  On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
> 
> > fort77 can't be compiled.
> >
> > Is there a way to know what package needs it?
> 
> netcdf needs it.  I don't think there are any others.  I think it is the
> f2c package that is broken by the gcc 3.3 update however, not fort77.



-- 
__Pascal_Bourguignon__
http://www.informatimago.com/
Do not adjust your mind, there is a fault in reality.


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

2003-09-30 Thread Jeffrey S Whitaker
Pascal:  If you installed the gcc3.3 update, "sudo /usr/sbin/gcc_select
3.1" and rebuild f2c and fort77.  If you haven't installed gcc 3.3, I have
no idea what's wrong.

 On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Pascal Bourguignon wrote:

> fort77 can't be compiled.
>
> Is there a way to know what package needs it?
>

netcdf needs it.  I don't think there are any others.  I think it is the
f2c package that is broken by the gcc 3.3 update however, not fort77.

-Jeff

-- 
Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (303)497-6313
NOAA/OAR/CDC  R/CDC1FAX   : (303)497-6449
325 BroadwayWeb   : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw
Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

2003-09-29 Thread David R. Morrison
I suppose you are using the updated Developer Tools?  There is a problem
with fort77 and the new tools.  As it says on Fink's homepage, users
are advised not to update their developer tools, or if they do, to be
sure and run "sudo gcc_select 3" before using fink to compile packages.

The problem with fort77 might actually lie in f2c, so you may need to go
back and recompile various things to get fort77 to work.

  -- Dave


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

2003-09-29 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Did you install the gcc3.3 update to the Developer Tools?  That causes  
a lot of havoc with Fortran.

On Monday, September 29, 2003, at 02:05 AM, Pascal Bourguignon wrote:

fort77 can't be compiled.

Is there a way to know what package needs it?

bash-2.05a$ fink --version
Package manager version: 0.13.7
Distribution version: 0.5.3.cvs
Copyright (c) 2001 Christoph Pfisterer
Copyright (c) 2001-2003 The Fink Package Manager Team
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
The following 2 additional packages will be installed:
 fort77 g77
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
dpkg -i  
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/db3_3.3.11- 
13_darwin-powerpc.deb
Selecting previously deselected package db3.
dpkg: considering removing db41-ssl in favour of db3 ...
dpkg: yes, will remove db41-ssl in favour of db3.
(Reading database ... 14953 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking db3 (from .../db3_3.3.11-13_darwin-powerpc.deb) ...
Setting up db3 (3.3.11-13) ...
rm -rf fort77-1.18-4
mkdir -p /sw/src/fort77-1.18-4
gzip -dc /sw/src/fort77-1.18.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xf -
sed 's||/sw|g' <  
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/languages/fort77-1.18-4.patch |  
patch -p1
patching file fort77
echo "no compile script"
no compile script
rm -rf /sw/src/root-fort77-1.18-4
mkdir -p /sw/src/root-fort77-1.18-4/sw
mkdir -p /sw/src/root-fort77-1.18-4/DEBIAN
mkdir -p /sw/src/root-fort77-1.18-4/sw/bin
 mkdir -p /sw/src/root-fort77-1.18-4/sw/share/man/man1
 make install BINDIR=/sw/src/root-fort77-1.18-4/sw/bin  
MANDIR=/sw/src/root-fort77-1.18-4/sw/share/man/man1
(cd tests; ./test.pl -v)
./fort77 -c foo.f ... test successful.
./fort77 -c bar.F ..."bar.o" not generated by "( ./fort77 -c bar.F )  
>/dev/null 2>&1"
./fort77 -c -o gargle.o foo.f /fort77 foo.f /fort77  
baz/bazfoo.f /fort77 -c baz/bazfoo.f /fort77 -o bar.o -c  
baz/ba\
zfoo.f /fort77 -o tscht foo.f /fort77 -k foo.f /fort77 -g  
-k foo.f /fort77 -c -f long.f /fort77 mainmiss.f \
/fort77 -c foo.f && ./fort77 -c mainmiss.f && ./fort77 -o foo foo.o  
mainmiss.o /fort77 -c foo.f && ./fort77 -o foo foo.o mainmi\
ss.f /fort77 synerr.f && touch gargle ...Total 1 error(s)  
encountered.
make: *** [test] Error 1
### execution of  failed, exit code 2
Failed: installing fort77-1.18-4 failed

--
__Pascal Bourguignon__
http://www.informatimago.com/


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel