Re: [Fink-devel] libtool "module" behavior and darwin

2002-11-26 Thread Nick Hudson 
On Monday 25 November 2002 2:43 pm, Max Horn wrote:
> An alternate solution might be to change the kbackgammon exectuable 
> to load the kbackgammon.so, too, instead of linking against it. Or is 
> there anything else that needs to link against these loadable modules?

Why? What benefit is there in doing it that way?

Nick


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T 
handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool "module" behavior and darwin

2002-11-25 Thread Max Horn 
An alternate solution might be to change the kbackgammon exectuable 
to load the kbackgammon.so, too, instead of linking against it. Or is 
there anything else that needs to link against these loadable modules?


Max
--
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: 
phone: (+49) 6151-494890


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel